Semantic Data Mapping on E-Learning Usage Index Tool to Handle Heterogeneity of Data Representation

Authors

  • Arda Yunianta Faculty of Computing Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Norazah Yusof Faculty of Computing Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Shahizan Othman Faculty of Computing Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Aziz Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Mulawarman University, 75123 Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Nataniel Dengen Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Mulawarman University, 75123 Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ugiarto Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Mulawarman University, 75123 Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Haeruddin Haeruddin Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Mulawarman University, 75123 Samarinda, Indonesia
  • Joan Angelina Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Mulawarman University, 75123 Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3193

Keywords:

Data mapping, D2RQ, learning environment, semantic ontology

Abstract

Distribution and heterogeneity of data is the current issues in data level implementation. Different data representation between applications makes the integration problem increasingly complex. Stored data between applications sometimes have similar meaning, but because of the differences in data representation, the application cannot be integrated with the other applications. Many researchers found that the semantic technology is the best way to resolve the current data integration issues. Semantic technology can handle heterogeneity of data; data with different representations and sources. With semantic technology data mapping can also be done from different database and different data format that have the same meaning data. This paper focuses on the semantic data mapping using semantic ontology approach. In the first level of process, semantic data mapping engine will produce data mapping language with turtle (.ttl) file format that can be used for Local Java Application using Jena Library and Triple Store. In the second level process, D2R Server that can be access from outside environment is provided using HTTP Protocol to access using SPARQL Clients, Linked Data Clients (RDF Formats) and HTML Browser. Future work to will continue on this topic, focusing on E-Learning Usage Index Tool (IPEL) application that is able to integrate with others system applications like Moodle E-Learning Systems. 

References

Kashyap, V., Sheth, A. 1997. Semantic Heterogeneity in Global Information Systems: The Role of Metedata, Context and Ontologies. In M.P. Papazoglou & G. Schlageter (Eds.). Cooperative Information Systems San Diego: Academic Press. 139–178.

Kim, W., Seo, J. 1991. Classifying Schematic and Data Heterogeneity in Multi Database Systems. IEEE Computer. 24(12): 12–18.

Sandborn, P., Terpenny, J., Rai, R., Nelson, R., Zheng, L., Schafer, C. 2011. Knowledge Representation and Design for Managing Product Obsolescence. In Proceedings of NSF Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation Grantees Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.

LePendu, P., Dou, D. 2011. Using Ontology Databases for Scalable Query Answering, Inconsistency Detection, and Data Integration. Springer Science Business Media. 37: 217–244.

Arenas, M. and Libkin, L. 2005. XML Data Exchange: Consistency and Query Answering,†in Proc. of the 24th ACM SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2005, ACM.

Bonifati, A., Chrysanthis, P., Ouksel, A. and Satter, K-U. 2008. Distributed Databases and Peer-to-Peer Databases: Past and Present. SIGMOD Record. 37: 1.

Bouquet, P., Serafini, L. and Zanobini, S. 2004. Peer-to-peer Semantic Coordination. Journal of Web Semantics. 2(1): 81–97.

Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M. and Rosati, R. 2004. Logical Founda-tions of Peer-To-Peer Data Integration. In Proc. of the 23rd ACM SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2004, ACM. 241–251.

Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P. and Popa, L. 2005. Data Exchange: Getting to the Core. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 30: 1

Pankowski, T. 2006. Management of Executable Schema Mappings for XML Data Exchange. In Database Technologies for Handling XML Information on the Web, EDBT 2006 Workshops, LNCS 4254, Springer. 264–277.

Pankowski, T. 2008. XML Data Integration in SixP2P-a Theoretical Framework. Data Management in P2P Systems. ACM. 11–18.

Ana, C., Kresimir, F. 2009. EAI Issues and Best Practices. Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science. 135–139.

Kong, Z., Wang, D., Zhang, J. 2007. A Strategic Framework for Enterprise Information Integration of ERP and E-Commerce. International Federation for Information Processing. 254: 701–705.

Bellatreche, L., Dung, N. X., Pierra, G., Hondjack, D. 2006. Contribution of Ontology-based Data Modeling to Automatic Integration of Electronic Catalogues within Engineering Databases. Computers in Industry. 57.

Castano, S., Antonellis, V., Vimercati, S. D. C. 2001. Global Viewing of Heterogeneous Data Sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 13(2): 277–297.

Chen, Y. 2010. Knowledge Integration and Sharing for Collaborative Molding Product Design and Process Development. Computers in Industry. 61: 659–675

Biggs, J. B. 1999. What the Student Does: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Cyganiak, R., Bizer, C., Garbers, J., Maresch, O., and Becker, C. 2012. The D2RQ Mapping Language. v0.8 – 2012-03-12. Retrieved 2, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-02

How to Cite

Semantic Data Mapping on E-Learning Usage Index Tool to Handle Heterogeneity of Data Representation. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3193