Evaluation of Service Performances of Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers in Actual Seas

Authors

  • Mohd Azuwan Ahmad Senior Engineer, Group Technical Services, MISC Berhad, Menara Dayabumi, 50050 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Faizul Amri Adnan Senior Lecturer, Marine Technology Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3263

Keywords:

Service performance, speed loss, added resistance, ship routeing, LNG carrier

Abstract

Ship performance in actual seas represents the true performance of the ship throughout the service life and is affected by the combination of various conditions i.e. environments, loading patterns and ship conditions. Environmental conditions of wind, wave, swell and ocean current are chaotic and stochastic in nature. Loading condition may vary in draft, trim and motions in each voyage. Ship condition is susceptible to hull and propeller fouled over years. This paper provides insight into the service performance of Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers (LNGC) in actual seas derived from post-mortem on years of voyage’s noon report collections. Evaluation method of service performance will be proposed and benefits that can be gained from such analysis will be discussed.

References

Aertsen, G. 1969. Service Performance and Trials at Sea. Appendix V: Performance Committee, 12th ITTC. 210–214.

Azuwan, M. 2013. Practical Ship Weather Routeing for Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Master Thesis. (to be published).

Avgouleas, K. 2008. Optimal Ship Routing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Master Thesis.

Babbedge, N. H. 1975. Ship Speed Analysis. Plymouth Polytechnic: Master Thesis.

Blok, J. J. 1993, Resistance Increase of a Ship in Waves. Master Thesis. Delft University.

Calvert, S. 1990. Optimal Weather Routeing Procedures for Vessels on Trans-Oceanic Voyages. Plymouth South West: PhD. Thesis.

Chen, H. T. 1978. A Dynamic Program for Minimum Cost Ship under Uncertainty. Massachusetts Institute of Technoogy: PhD. Thesis.

Hermans, A. J. 2005. Added Resistance by Means of Time Domain Models in Seakeeping. Journal of Ship Research. 49(4): 252–262.

Hogben, N; Da Cunha, N. M. C. and Oliver, G. F. 1986. Global Wave Statistics. Unwin Brothers, London.

Hogben, N. and Lumb, F. E. 1967. Ocean Wave Statistics. HMSO.

Holtrop, J. and Mennen, G. G. J. 1982. An Approximate Power Prediction Method. International Shipbuildinq Proqress. 29(335): l66–170.

ITTC. 2005. Testing and Extrapolation Methods, Propulsion, Performance, Predicting Powering Margins. ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines.

James, R. W. 1957. Application of Wave Forecasts to Marine Navigation. U.S Oceanographic Office.

Journee. 1976. Prediction of Speed and Behaviour of a Ship in a Seaway. 23(265).

Journee, J. M. J. and Meijers, J. H. C. 1980. Ship Routeing for Optimum Performance. Transaction Institute of Marine Engineers. 92.

Kwon, Y. J. 2008. Speed Loss Due to Added Resistance in Wind and Waves. The Naval Architect, March 2008. 14–16.

Tsujimoto, M., Kuroda, M., Shibata, N., Sogihara, N. and Takagi, K. 2009. On a Calculation of Decrease of Ship Speed in Actual Seas. Conference Proceedings, JASNAOE. 7E: 77–80.

Motte, R. H. 1981. Ship Based Weather Routeing (Using Dynamical Meteorology). Plymouth Polytechnic: PhD. Thesis.

NMRI. 2006. Database of Winds and Waves-Internet Version. National Maritime Research Institute.

Townsin, R. L., Kwon, Y. J., Baree, M. S. and Kim, D. Y. 1993. Estimating the Influence of Weather on Ship Performance. Royal Institution of Naval Architect. 135.

Townsin, R. L. and Kwon, Y. J. 1982. Approximate Formulae for the Speed Loss Due to Added Resistance in Wind and Waves. Royal Institution of Naval Architect. 125: 199–207.

WMO. 2011. Manual on Codes-Part A. WMO-No. 306, World Meteorological Organization, Section E. I.1.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-15

How to Cite

Evaluation of Service Performances of Liquefied Natural Gas Carriers in Actual Seas. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 69(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3263