Feasibility Study of Wing-In-Ground for Marine Rescue Operation

Authors

  • Jaswar Koto Department of Aeronautic, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • E. Prayetno Ocean and Aerospace Research Institute, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3265

Keywords:

Kepulauan Riau, accident at sea, rescue operation, initial position, optimal position, great circle distance, standard error, latitude, longitude, wing in ground

Abstract

This study aims to investigate performance of current rescue facilities and position based on statistic data of sea accident between 2010 and 2011 in Kepulauan Riau. Current rescue facilities are located at the latitude 0.93105 and longitude 104.44359. Using the statistic data, an optimal recue location and facilities in Kepulauan Riau are determine based on International Maritime Organization (IMO) standard. International Maritime Organization requirement, an emergency, passengers should be able to leave the ship with time 60 minutes. The optimal position and rescue facilities are determined using Great Circle Distance-Spherical Trigonometry and Statistical of Standard Error methods. In this study, simulation code is developed using visual basic 2010 language. Results of simulation show current rescue facility requires a lot of time to reach the accident location which is up to 12.5 hours. In order to meet IMO requirement, this study proposes wing in ground for rescue operation. Using current rescue location, wing in ground also does not meet the IMO standard which is up to 3.04 hours. Additional, this study divides the Kepulauan Riau into two regions of rescue operation. The optimal for rescue facilities of region 1, at the latitude 0.74568 and longitude 104.36256, and based on the distribution of the accidents in Kepulauan Riau 2010-2011, current rescue facility required up to 5.6 hours to reach the accident area, while the wing in ground facilities required up to 1.3 hours. The optimal for rescue facilities of region 2, at the latitude 3.00338 and longitude 107.79373, current rescue facility required up to 5 hours to reach the accident area, while the wing in ground facilities required shorter time that is up to 1.2 hour.

References

Alexander Nebylov. 2006. Wing-In-Ground Vehicles: Modern Concepts of Design, Automatic Control, Applications. State University of Aerospace Instrumentation, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

S. Akagi, 1993. A Study of Transport Economy and Market Research for High Speed Marine Passenger Vehicles. Proceedings of Fast 93, Second International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Yokohama: Society of Naval Architects of Japan. 1129–1142.

Chin Su Peak. 2006. The Viability of Commercializing Wing-in-Ground (Wig) Craft in Connection with Technical, Economic and Safety Aspects Followed by Imo Legislation. World Maritime University.

David Lane's. 2011. HyperStat Online Statistics Textbook. Departments of Psychology, Statistics, and Management. Rice University.

Du Mian-yi, Chenpei. 2010. Dynamic Aerodynamic Characteristics Simulation of WIG Effect Craft Based on Moving Overset Grid. Proceedings of the 13th Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

E. A. A. Frameev. 1998. Conceptual Bases of WIG Craft Building: Ideas, Reality and Outlooks. Krylov Shipbuilding Research Institute 44, MoskovskoeShosse Saint Petersburg.196158. Russia.

Graham. K. Taylor. 2006. Innovation Dying Of Apathy: Wig–A Case Study. RINA International Conference.

Graham Taylor. 2003. Re-defining Sea Level: The Hoverwing Wing In Ground Effect Vehicle. Air Cushion Technology Conference & Exhibition, England.

Han-Koo Jeong et al. 2010. On the Structural Test of 1.5-ton Test WIG Craft. Department of Naval Architecture, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Jeonbuk 573-701, Korea.

Jaswar, E. Prayetno, A. S. A. Kader and C. L.Siow. 2013, Wing-In-Ground for Rescue Operation in Kepulauan Riau. International Conference on Marine Safety and Environment, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

Jovin J. Mwemezi and Youfang Huang. 2011. Optimal Facility Location on Spherical Surfaces: Algorithm and Application. Logistics Research Center, Shanghai Maritime University

Kirill V. Rozhdestvensky. 2006. Wing-in-Ground Effect Vehicles. Saint-Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Lotsmanskaya 3, Saint-Petersburg, 190008, Russia.

Sungbu Suh, et al. 2011.Numerical And Experimental Studies On Wing In Ground Effect. International Journal of Ocean System Engineering.

Lee Qihui. 2006. Stability, Control and Performance for an Inverted Delta Wing-In-Ground Effect Aircraft. Department of Mechanical Engineering. National University of Singapore.

Quah Yong Seng, Jonathan. 2005. Stability, Performance & Control for a Wing in Ground Vehicle. Department of Mechanical Engineering. National University of Singapore.

Seung-Hyun Gwag. 1997. Numerical Study on 3-Dimensional Power-Augmented Ram Wing in Ground Effect. Proceedings of the Seventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Honolulu, USA.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-15

How to Cite

Feasibility Study of Wing-In-Ground for Marine Rescue Operation. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3265