Hull Structure Integrity Management in Floating Structures–FSO Puteri Dulang Case

Authors

  • Ajith Kumar Thankappan Department of Hull and Structure, Engineering and Design, Offshore Business Unit, MISC Berhad, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • M. Fazli B. M. Yusof Department of Hull and Structure, Engineering and Design, Offshore Business Unit, MISC Berhad, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3266

Keywords:

Hull structure, finite element analysis, global structural strength, fatigue analysis

Abstract

This paper highlights the key differences in practices employed in managing hull structure integrity of permanently moored floating offshore structures as against sailing vessels which are subject to periodic dry docking. During the design phase, the structural integrity management over the life of a sailing vessel is primarily taken into account by means of Class prescribed Nominal Design Corrosion Values which are added to minimum scantling requirements calculated based on strength and fatigue criteria. In contrast, for permanently moored offshore installations like FPSOs, FSOs etc. the hull structure integrity over the entire design life of the asset is a key design consideration both for new buildings and conversions. Analytic methods and tools (primarily those developed by Class Societies) are available to evaluate the strength requirements (based on yielding, buckling and ultimate strength criteria) and fatigue life of the hull structure. Typically three levels of analysis with increasing degree of complexity and analysis time are used to predict the structural response and fatigue life of the Hull during design phase. The degree of detailed analysis required needs to be determined in light of the expected optimization in terms of savings in scantlings for new building or for steel renewal requirements in case of conversions.

References

Drewry Maritime Research. Shipping Insight. Aug 2013.

Mustang Engineering. 2012. Worlwide Survey of FPSO Units, Offshore Magazine.

ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels. 2010. Part 5A, Sec 12.

ABS Commentary on Criteria to Adapt Safehull System to FPSO Applications. 2004.

ABS Rules for Building and Cassing Floating Production Installations. 2013.

ABS Guidance Notes On Safehull Finite Element Analysis Of Hull Structures. 2004.

ABS Guide for Fatigue Assessment of Offshore Structures.

ABS Guide for ‘Dynamic Loading Approach’ for FPSO Installations. 2010.

ABS Guide for Spectral-based Fatigue Analysis for Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) Installations.

Bureau Veritas, BV Rules for the Classification of Offshore Units. NR455, Pt D Ch 1 Sec 5. 2010.

Bureau Veritas, BV Rules for Classification of Steel Ships, NR 467, Pt B Ch 7 App 1. 2011.

Bureau Veritas, BV rules for the Classification of Steel Ships, NR 467, Pt B Ch 7 Sec 1. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-15

How to Cite

Hull Structure Integrity Management in Floating Structures–FSO Puteri Dulang Case. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 69(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3266