Univariate Throughput Forecasting Models on Container Terminal Equipment Planning

Authors

  • Jonathan Yong Chung Ee Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Technology Malaysia, 81300 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abd Saman Abd Kader Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Technology Malaysia, 81300 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zamani Ahmad Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Technology Malaysia, 81300 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Loke Keng Beng Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Technology Malaysia, 81300 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3283

Keywords:

Port planning, equipment forecasting, univariate, ARIMA, exponential smoothing

Abstract

Planning of Container Terminal equipment has always been uncertain due to seasonal and fluctuating throughput demand, along with factors of delay in operation, breakdown and maintenance. Many time-series models have been developed to forecast the unforeseen future of container throughput to project the needed amount of port equipments for optimum operation. Conventionally, a "ratio" method developed by port consultants at early port design stage is adopted for equipment planning, giving no consideration to the dynamic growth of the port in terms of improved layout and technological advancement in equipments. This study seeks first to enhance the empirical approach of the equipment planning at the end of planning time horizon by including assumed coefficient of port capacity parameters. The second is to compare the size of equipment purchase by receiving different terminal's future throughput demand from two univariate forecasting models at planning time horizon. The empirical method of equipment planning will be tested against the conventional yard equipment per quay crane ratio after deriving the throughput demand from forecasting models of Holt-Winter's exponential smoothing and seasonal ARIMA (autoregression integrated moving average) model. Results in the form of graphs and tables indicate similar forecasting pattern by two models and equipment estimation proofs to avail more redundancy for optimum operation. Suggestions for better estimation of equipments are also made for future models.

References

Steenken D., S. Vob, R. Stahlbock. 2004. Container Terminal Operation and Operations Research: A Classification and Literature Review. Spectrum. 26: 3–49.

Young-Tae Chang , Jose Tongzon , Meifeng Luo & Paul Tae-Woo Lee. 2012. Estimation of Optimal Handling Capacity of a Container Port: An Economic Approach, Transport Reviews. A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal. 32(2): 241–258. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2011.644346

Prakash Gaur. 2005. Port Planning as a Strategic Tool: A Typology, Master Thesis of Science in Transport and Maritime Economics. Institute of Transport and Maritime Management Antwerp University of Antwerp.

Jasmine, L. S. L., Eddy, V. D. V. 2012. Green Port Strategy for Sustainable Growth and Development. Nanyang Technological University & University of Antwerp, Unknown Publisher.

Joan C. Rijsenbrij, Armin Wieschemann. 2011. Sustainable Container Terminals: A Design Approach. Handbook of Terminal Planning, Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series. 49: 61–82.

Nima Sharif Mohseni. 2011. Master Thesis Project: Developing a Tool for Designing a Container Terminal Yard, Delft University of Technology & Royal Haskoning.

Frankel, E. G. 1987. Port Planning and Development. Wiley-Interscience Publication. ISBN 0-471-83708-3.

Loke, K. B., Kader, A. S. A. and Zamani, M. 2012. Optimising Expansion Control On Quay Crane Development In Container Terminal, International Conference on Marine Technology Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, 20-22 October 2012, UMT/FMSM/MARTEC/MMP-17.

MOMAF. 1998. Optimal Port Capacity Study on National Ports (Contract Research Report Written in Korean) (Seoul: The Korea Maritime Institute).

Brown, R. G. 1963. Smoothing, Forecasting and Prediction of Discrete Time Series. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

Holt, C. C. 2004. Forecasting Seasonals and Trends by Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages. International Journal of Forecasting. 20: 5–10.

Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. 1976. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Hoboken USA: John Wily & son, Inc.

UNCTAD. 1985. Port Development–A Handbook for Planners in Developing Countries. United Nations, New York. 227.

Kuroda, K., Takebayashi, M., Tsuji, T. and Muto, M. 1999. Influence of Port Management Policy on the Behavior of Container Liner Ship Company and Shippers. Journal of EASTS. 3(2): 127–138.

Chu, C. Y. and W. C. Huang. 2005. Determining Container Terminal Capacity on the Basis of an Adopted Yard Handling System. Transport Reviews. 25(2): 181–199.

Dally, H. K. 1983. Container Handling and Transport—A Manual of Current Practice. London: Cargo Systems IIR Publications Ltd.

Dharmalingam, K. 1987. Design of Storage Facilities for Containers—A Case Study of Port Louis Harbour, Mauritius, Ports and Harbors, September. 27–31.

Itsuro, W. 2001. Container Terminal Planning—A Theoretical Approach. Leatherhead, UK: World Cargo Publishing.

Dekker Sander &Verhaeghe, R. J. 2008. Development of a Strategy for Port Expansion: An Optimal Control Approach. Maritime Economic and Logistics. 10: 258–274.

Saman Kader. 1997. Cost Modelling for Inland Waterway Transport Systems. Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Engineering. Liverpool John Moores University. 276.

Silver, E., D. Pyke, and R. Peterson, 1998. Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. Wiley, USA.

ZdenkaZenzerović, Edna Mrnjavac (Unknown). Modelling of Port Container Terminal Using The Queuing Theory. Dept. of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka.

Nevins, M. R., Macal, C. M., Love, R. J. and Bragen, M. J. 1998. Simulation, Animation, and Visualization of Seaport Operations. Simulation. 71(2): 96–106.

Gambradella, L. M., Rizzoli, A. E. and Zaffalon, M. 1998. Simulation and Planning of Intermodal Container Terminal. Simulation. 71(2): 107–116.

Yun, W. Y. and Choi, Y. S. 1999. A Simulation Model for Container-Terminal Operation Analysis Using an Object Oriented Approach. International Journal of Production Economics. 59(1–3): 221–230.

Tahar, R. M. and Hussain, K. 2000. Simulation and Analysis for the Kelang Container Terminal operations. Logistics Information Management. 13(1): 14–20.

Legato, P. and Mazza, R. M. 2001. Berth Planning and Resources Optimization at a Container Terminal via Discrete Event Simulation. European Journal of Operational Research. 133(3): 537–547.

Nam, K.-C., Kwak, K.-S. and Yu, M.-S. 2002. Simulation Study of Container Terminal Performance. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 128(3): 126–132.

Rijsenbrij, J. and A. Wieschemann. 2011. Sustainable Container Terminals: A Design Approach. Handbook of Terminal Planning. J. W. Böse, Springer New York. 49: 61–82.

Chatterjee, S. and A. S. Hadi. 2012. Regression Analysis by Example. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Duan X. et al. 2012. Application of Attribute Theory for Container Throughput Forecast, IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing 2012. DOI: 978-1-4673-2311.

Li, X. and Xu, S. 2011. A Study on Port Container Throughput Prediction Based on Optimal Combined Forecasting Model in Shanghai Port. ICCTP 2011. 3894–3905.

Rowe, G. 2007. A Guide to Delphi. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting. 8: 11–16.

Xie, G. et al. 2013. Hybrid Approaches based on LSSVR Model for Container Throughput Forecasting: A Comparative Study. Applied Soft Computing. 13(5): 2232–2241.

Chen, S.-H. and J.-N. Chen. 2010. Forecasting Container Throughputs at Ports Using Genetic Programming. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(3): 2054–2058.

Chou, C.-C., et al. 2008. A Modified Regression Model for Forecasting the Volumes of Taiwan’s Import Containers. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 47(9–10): 797–807.

Seabrooke, W. et al. 2003. Forecasting Cargo Growth and Regional Role of the Port of Hong Kong. Cities. 20(1): 51–64.

Peng, W.-Y. and C.-W. Chu. 2009. A Comparison of Univariate Methods for Forecasting Container Throughput Volumes. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 50(7–8): 1045–1057.

Gosasang, V. et al. 2011. A Comparison of Traditional and Neural Networks Forecasting Techniques for Container Throughput at Bangkok Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 27(3): 463–482.

Liu, C.-I., et al. 2004. Automated Guided Vehicle System for Two Container Yard Layouts. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 12(5): 349–368.

Gosasang Veerachai, Watcharavee Chandraprakaikul, Supaporn Kiattisin. 2010. An Application of Neural Networks for Forecasting Container Throughput at Bangkok Port, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010 Vol I, WCE 2010, June 30 - July 2, 2010, London, U.K.

Winters, P. R. 1960. Forecasting Sales by Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages. Management Science. 6: 324–342.

Roland Fried, Ann Cathrice George. 2011. Exponential and Holt-Winters Smoothing. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Makridakis, S., C. Chatfield, M. Hibon, M. Lawrence, T. Mills, K. Ord & L. F. Simmons. 1993. The M2-competition: A real-time judgmentally based forecasting study. International Journal of Forecasting. 9: 5–22.

Sander Dekker. 2010. Sustainable Port Development In The Netherlands–Framework for a Comprehensive Approach Applied To Amsterdam Port. 12th Wctr Lisbon, Portugal. Strategic Consultant Transport & Economics, Grontmij Nederland Bv.

Park Nam-Kyu, Branislav Dragović. 2009. A Study of Container Terminal Planning, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade. FME Transactions. 37: 203–209.

Zamani Ahmad. 2006. The Application of Fuzzy Expert System to Preliminary Development Planning of Medium Size Container Terminal. Doctor of Engineering in Engineering Business Management. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 355.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-15

How to Cite

Univariate Throughput Forecasting Models on Container Terminal Equipment Planning. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 69(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3283