Simulative Study of Two-Phase Homogenous and Isotropic Media Imaging using Magnetic Induction Tomography

Authors

  • Zulkarnay Zakaria Tomographic Imaging Research Group, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Ibrahim Balkhis Tomographic Imaging Research Group, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Lee Pick Yern Tomographic Imaging Research Group, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Nor Muzakkir Nor Ayob Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Mohd Hafiz Fazalul Rahiman Tomographic Imaging Research Group, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zikrillah Zawahirah Tomographic Imaging Research Group, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Ruzairi Abdul Rahim Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3298

Abstract

Magnetic induction tomography is a new non-invasive technology, based on eddy current discovery of electromagnetic induction by Michael Faraday. Through this technique, the passive electrical properties distribution of an object can be obtained by the use of image reconstruction algorithm implemented in this system. There are many types of image reconstruction that have been developed for this modality, however in this paper only two algorithms discussed, Linear Back Projection and Eminent Pixel Reconstruction. Linear Back Projection algorithm is the most basic type of image reconstruction. It is the simplest and fast algorithm out of all types of algorithms, whereas Eminent Pixel Reconstruction algorithm is an improved algorithm which provided better images and has been implemented in other modalities such as optical tomography. This paper has implemented Eminent Pixel Reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography applications and the performance is compared to Linear Back Projection based on the simulation of the fourteen types of simulated phantoms of homogenous and isotropic conductivity property. It was found that Eminent Pixel Reconstruction has produced better images relative to Linear Back Projection, however the images are still poor when the objects are located near to the excitation coil or sensor and it is worse when the distance between objects are near to each other.

References

Soleimani, M. 2008. Computational Aspects of Low Frequency Electrical and Electromagnetic Tomography: A Review Study. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modelling. 5: 407–440

Zakaria, Z., Rahim, R.A., Mansor, M.S.B.,Yaacob, S., Ayob, N. M. N., Muji, S.Z.M., Rahiman, M.H.F. and Aman, S. M. K. S. 2012. Advancements in Transmitters and Sensors for Biological Tissue Imaging in Magnetic Induction Tomography. Sensors. 12: 7126–7156

Tian, G. Y., Al-Qubaa, A. & Wilson, J. 2012. Design of an Electromagnetic Imaging System for Weapon Detection Based on GMR Sensor Arrays. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 174: 75–84.

Griffiths, H. 2001. Magnetic Induction Tomography. Measurement Science and Technology. 12: 1126–1131.

Griffiths, H. 2005. Magnetic Induction Tomography. Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications. 213–238

Terzija, N., Yin, W., Gerbeth, G., Stefani, F., Timmel, K., Wondrak, T., Peyton, A. J. 2011. Use of Electromagnetic Induction Tomography for Monitoring Liquid Metal/Gas Flow Regimes on a Model of an Industrial Steel Caster. Measurement Science and Technology. 22: 1–8.

Nor Ayob, N. M., Zakaria, Z., Fazalul Rahiman, M. H., Abdul Rahim, R. & Yaacob, S. 2011. Initial Development on Magnetic Induction Tomography Imaging. Jurnal Teknologi. 55: 11–14.

Soleimani, M. 2006. Sensitivity Maps in Three-dimensional Magnetic Induction Tomography. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring. 48: 39–44.

Yin, W. & Peyton, A. J. 2010. Sensitivity Formulation Including Velocity Effects for Electromagnetic Induction System. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 46: 1172–1176.

Fazalul Rahiman, M. H., Abdul Rahim, R. & Zakaria, Z. 2008. Design and Modelling of Ultrasonic Tomography for Two-component High-acoustic Impedance Mixture. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 147: 409–414.

Nor Ayob, N. M., Fazalul Rahiman, M. H., Zakaria, Z., Abdul Rahim, R. & Yaacob, S. 2011. Eminent Pixel Reconstruction Algorithm For Ultrasonic Tomography. Jurnal Teknologi. 55: 15–22.

Ritman, E. L. 2004. Micro-computed Tomography-current Status and Developments. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 6: 185–208.

Haff, R. P. & Toyofuku. 2008. N. X-ray detection of defects and contaminants in the food industry. Sensing and Instrumentation for Food Quality and Safety. 2: 262–273.

Gore, J. C., Manning, H. C., Quarles, C. C., Waddell, K. W. & Yankeelov, T. E. 2011. Magnetic Resonance in the Era of Molecular Imaging of Cancer. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 29: 587–600.

Thybo, A. K., Jespersen, S. N., Laerke, P. E. & Stødkilde-Jørgensen, H. J. 2004. Nondestructive Detection of Internal Bruise and Spraing Disease Symptoms in Potatoes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 22: 1311–7.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-20

How to Cite

Simulative Study of Two-Phase Homogenous and Isotropic Media Imaging using Magnetic Induction Tomography. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(8). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3298