The Effects of Distance on Velocity Measurement for Different Shapes of Electrostatic Sensor Electrodes

Authors

  • Mozhde Heydarianasl Department of Control and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering ,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Fua’ad Rahmat Department of Control and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering ,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3299

Keywords:

Velocity measurement, cross correlation method, electrostatic sensors, circular electrode, pin electrode

Abstract

Velocity measurement has significant role in several industries that cope with particles to save power consumption and to improve quality of particles. This paper describes the effect of distance on velocity measurement for different shapes of electrodes for example pin, circular, rectangular, and quarter ring electrode. This distance is referred to separation of electrodes. Electrostatic sensors are suitable to measure the velocity of particles due to their inexpensive, simplicity and robust. These shapes of electrodes are modeled by mathematical equations and analyzed by Mathcad software. In addition, velocity is measured in laboratory by different shapes of electrodes in different distances. Cross correlation method is experimentally used to measure the velocity.  Increase the distance between electrodes leads to increase the time lag, but velocity remains constant. The results of modeling electrodes and experimental tests are compared with each other and they verify that these electrodes are more reliable in industries in addition to cost- effectiveness and high efficiency. 

References

Beck, M. S. 1981. Correlation in Instruments: Cross Correlation Flow Meters. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments. 14(1): 7.

Beck, M. S., R. G. Green, and R. Thorn. 1987. Non-intrusive Measurement of Solids Mass Flow in Pneumatic Conveying. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments. 20(7): 835.

Gajewski, J. B. 1993. Electrostatic, Non-Contact, Continuous, and Real-Time Velocity Measurements in Pneumatic Transport Pipe. IEEE. 1709–1713.

Krabicka, J. and Y. Yan. 2007. Finite Element Modeling of Intrusive Electrostatic Sensors for the Measurement of Pulverised Fuel Flows. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, 2007. IMTC 2007. IEEE. 1–4.

Krabicka, J. and Y. Yan. 2009. Optimized Design of Intrusive Electrostatic Sensors for the Velocity Measurement of Pneumatically Conveyed Particles. In proc. 12MTC, Singapore. 5-7 May, 2009. 341–345.

Krabicka, J. and Y. Yan. 2009. Finite Element Modeling of Intrusive Electrostatic Sensors for the Measurement of Particles in Pneumatic Pipelines. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. Aug. 2009. 58(8): 2730–2736.

Zhang, J., H. Hu, J. Dong, and Y. Yan. 2012. Concentration Measurement of Biomass/Coal/Air Three-Phase Flow by Integrating Electrostatic and Capacitive Sensors. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 24: 43–49.

Zhang, W., C. Wang, and , Y. Wang. 2010. Parameter Selection in Cross-Correlation-based Velocimetry Using Circular Electrostatic Sensors. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on. 59(5): 1268–1275.

Xu, L. A. 1998. Cross Correlation low Measurement Technique. Tianjin, China: Tianjin Univ. Press.

Yan, Y. 1996. Mass Flow Measurement F Bulk Solids In Pneumatic Pipelines. Meas. Sci. Technol. 7(12): 1687–1706, Dec. 1996.

Woodhead, S. R. and J.E. Amadi- Echendu. 1995. Solid Phase Velocity Measurements Utilizing Electrostatic Sensors and Cross Correlation Signal Processing. In Proc. Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf. Waltham, MA, Apr. 24-26, 1995. 774.

Yang, W.Q. and M.S. Beck. 1998. An Intelligent Cross Correlator for pipeline flow velocity measurement. Flow Meas. Instrum. 8(2):77–84.

Yan, Y., L. J. Xu, and P. Lee. 2006. Mass Flow Measurement of Fine Particles in a Pneumatic Suspension Using Electrostatic Sensing and Neural Network Techniques. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 55(6): 2330–2334.

Rahmat, M. F. and N. S. Kamaruddin. 2009. An Electrodynamic Sensor for Electrostatic Charge Measurement. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems. 2: 200–212.

Rahmat, M. F., I. T. Thuku, T. Tajdari, , K. Jusoff, and M. R. Ghazali. 2011. Sensing and Filtering Characteristics of Electrostatic Sensors for Pneumatically Conveyed Particles. International Journal of the Physical Sciences. 6(22): 5091–5103.

Seraj, H., M. F. Rahmat, and M. Khaled. 2012. Measurement of Velocity of Solid/Air Two Phase Fluid Using Electrostatic Sensors and Cross Correlation Technique. Scientia Iranica. 1–7.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-20

How to Cite

The Effects of Distance on Velocity Measurement for Different Shapes of Electrostatic Sensor Electrodes. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(8). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3299