Study of the Variation of Catalyst Loading in Cathode for SPEEK/CSMM Membrane in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC)

Authors

  • S. E. Rosli Advanced Membrane Technology Research Center (AMTEC) Material and Manufacturing Research Alliance (MMRA), Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • M. N. A. Mohd-Norddin Advanced Membrane Technology Research Center (AMTEC) Material and Manufacturing Research Alliance (MMRA), Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • J. Jaafar Advanced Membrane Technology Research Center (AMTEC) Material and Manufacturing Research Alliance (MMRA), Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • R. Sudirman Biomedical, Instrumentation & Electronic Research Group Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3397

Keywords:

Direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC), sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) (SPEEK), charged surface modifying macromolecules (cSMM), catalyst loading

Abstract

Variation of anode catalyst loading for modified sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) with charged surface modifying macromolecules (cSMM) membrane was studied, in order to get the higher performance in DMFC. The best optimal anode catalyst loading was 4 mgcm-2 for 30% Pt/Ru based on our previous result for this application.  The modified SPEEK/CSMM membrane was characterized to ensure of its better performance in term of water uptake and methanol permeability. In cathode side, the effect of 5% and 10% Pd/C  in 2,4 and 6 mgcm-2 of catalyst loading has been investigated with a fuel cell assembly. The preparation method of catalyst ink and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) was based on Dr. Blade method and hot pressing by using catalyzed diffusion media (CDM) method. The air flowrates were varied from 25-1000ml min-1, while 1M methanol concentrations, 1 ml min-1 of methanol flowrate and 60°C operating temperature were kept constant. These parameters were tested on the performance of single cell DMFC with 4 cm2 electrodes.The optimization catalyst loading will enhance the DMFC performance.  It was found, the best optimal cathode catalyst loading was 4 mgcm-2 for 10% Pd/C with  4 mgcm-2 for 30% Pt/Ru in anode side for this application. 

References

Zainoodin, A. M., Kamarudin, S. K. & Daud, W. R. W. 2008. Electrode in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 35: 4606–4621.

Gogel, V. et al. 2004. Performance and Methanol Permeation of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: Dependence on Operating Conditions and on Electrode Structure. Journal of Power Sources. 127: 172–180.

Jones, D. J. & Rozière, J. 2001. Recent advances in the Functionalisation of Polybenzimidazole and Polyetherketone for Fuel Cell Applications. Journal of Membrane Science. 185: 41–58.

Jung, H.-Y. & Park, J.-K. 2009. Long-term Performance of DMFC Based on the Blend Membrane of Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) and Poly(vinylidene fluoride). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 34: 3915–3921.

Yang, T. 2008. Preliminary Study of SPEEK/PVA Blend Membranes for DMFC Applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33: 6772–6779.

Norddin, M. N. a. M., Ismail, a. F., Rana, D., Matsuura, T. & Tabe, S. 2009. The Effect of Blending Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) with Various Charged Surface Modifying Macromolecules on Proton Exchange Membrane Performance. Journal of Membrane Science 328: 148–155.

Norddin, M. N. A. M. et al. 2008. Characterization and performance of Proton Exchange Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell: Blending of Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) with Charged Surface Modifying Macromolecule. Journal of Membrane Science. 323: 404–413.

Baldauf, M. & Preidel, W. 1999. Status of the Development of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell. Journal of Power Sources. 84: 161–166.

Reeve, R., Christensen, P., Dickinson, a., Hamnett, a & Scott, K. 2000. Methanol-tolerant Oxygen Reduction Catalysts Based on Transition Metal Sulfides and Their Application to the Study of Methanol Permeation. Electrochimica Acta. 45: 4237–4250.

Ãlvarez, G. F., Mamlouk, M. & Scott, K. 2011. An Investigation of Palladium Oxygen Reduction Catalysts for the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell. International Journal of Electrochemistry. 1–12 .

Hashim, N., Kamarudin, S. K. & Daud, W. R. W. 2009. Design, Fabrication and Testing of a PMMA-based Passive Single-cell and a Multi-cell Stack Micro-DMFC. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 34: 8263–8269.

Rosli, S. E., Mohd-Norddin, M. N. A, Jaafar, J., Sudirman, R. 2013. Study on Catalyst Loading Using SPEEK/CSMM Membrane in DMFC. Power Engineering and Optimizing Conference. 13: 234–237.

Rana, D. 2008. Charged Surface Modifying Macromolecules in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane. 49: 91–102.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-20

How to Cite

Study of the Variation of Catalyst Loading in Cathode for SPEEK/CSMM Membrane in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC). (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(9). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3397