Effect of Regenerated Cellulose of Ultrafiltration Membranes on POME Treatment

Authors

  • Nazatul Shima Azmi Department of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Khairul Faezah Md. Yunos Department of Process and Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3442

Keywords:

Palm oil mill effluent, palm kernel shell-based activated carbon, ultrafiltration, treated POME

Abstract

Palm oil mill effluent (POME) in palm oil industry has become a big issue of environmental pollution to be solved urgently and critically. This wastewater consists of water, oil, and natural sediments. Hence, in this study, the work was carried out to investigate ultrafiltration process feasibility for treating palm oil mill effluent. Palm kernel shell bioactivated carbon (PKS-AC) adsorbent was used in adsorption treatment (pre-treatment) was used to reduced solid particles in POME. For adsorption treatment, POME was stirred with 0.20 g/L of PKS-AC at 39.94 minute and sediment for one hour. Membrane separation was subsequently applied to further treat the pre-treated POME. In this study, the permeate flux was found to be dependent to pressure applied, solution pH and stirring speed. An optium conditions was achieved at pressure 2 bar, with solution pH 8 using stirring speed 600 rpm. Considerable amount of POME pollutant is also reduced by used membrane for TS, DS, SS, BOD5, COD and turbidity were 625.32 mg/L, 445.32 mg/L, 180 mg/L, 1296 mg/L, 541.76 mg/L, and 16.20 NTU respectively. Thus, this result show that the pollutant in POME was reduced significantly using this technique.

References

MPOB. [Internet document] URL http://bepi.mpob.gov.my/index.php/statistics/sectoral-status/106-sectoral- status-2012/512-number-a-capacities-of-palm-oil-sectors-2012.html. Assessed on 24/07/2012.

Ahmad, M. N., Mokhtar, M. N., Baharuddin, A. S., Hock, L. S., Ali, S. R. A., Aziz, S. A., Rahman, N. A., Hassan, M. A. 2011. Changes in Physiochemical and Microbial Community during Co-composting of Oil Palm Frond with Palm Oil Mill Effluent Anaerobic Sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 6(4): 4762–4780.

Ahmad, A. L., Chan, C.Y. 2009. Sustainability of Palm Oil Industries: An Innovative Treatment via Membrane Technology. J. Applied Sci. 9: 3074–3079.

Ahmad, A. L., Ismail, S., Bhatia, S. 2003. Water Recycling from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Using Membrane Technology. Desalination. 157: 87–95.

Ma, A. N. 2000. Environmental Management for the Oil Palm Industry. Palm Oil Development. 30: 1–10.

Ma, A. N. 1995. A Novel Treatment for Palm Oil Mill Effluent. Palm Oil Res. Instit. Malaysia (PORIM). 29: 201–212.

Wu, T. Y., Mohammad, A. W., Md. Jahim, J., Anuar, N. 2007. Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Treatment and Bioresources Recovery Using Ultrafiltration Membrane: Effect of Pressure On Membrane Fouling. Biochem. Eng. J. 35(3): 309–317.

Quah, S. K., Lim, K. H., Gillies, D., Wood, B. J., Kanagaratnam, J. 1982. POME Treatment and Land Application System. Proc. Regional Workshop on Palm Oil Mill Technology and Effluent Treatment. Kuala Lumpur: PORIM. 193–200.

Ahmad, A. L., Chong, M. F., Bhatia, S., Ismail, S. 2006. Drinking Water Reclamation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) using Membrane Technology. Desalination. 191: 35–44.

Cheryan, M., Rajagopalan, M. 1998. Membrane Processing of Oily Streams. Wastewater Treatment and Waste Reduction. J. Member. Sci. 151: 13–28.

Wang, J., Zhou, X., Ma, J. 2012. Preparation and Characteristics of a Paper-based Ultrafiltration Membrane. Bioresour. Technol. 7(1): 545–553.

Devi, R., Dahiya, R. P. 2007. COD Reduction in Domestic Wastewater by Fly Ash and Carbon and Brick Klin Ash. J. Water Air Soil Pollut. 174(1–4): 33–46.

Devi, R., Sigh, V., Kumar, A. 2007. COD and BOD Reduction From Coffee Processing Wastewater Using Avocado Peel Carbon. Bioresour. Technol. 99: 1853–1860.

Kvech, S., Tull, E. Activated Carbon. [Internet document] URL: http://ewr.cee.vt.edu/environmental/teach/wtprimer/carbon/sketcarb.html. Assessed on 2/8/2012.

Alam, M. Z., Muyibi, S. A., Kamaldin, N. 2008. Production of Activated Carbon from Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for Removal of Zinc. Twelfth International Water Technology Conference (IWTC12). Alexandria, Egypt. 373–383.

Mall, I. D., Upadhyay, S.N. 1998. Studies of Treatment of Basic Dyes Bearing Wastewater by Adsorptive Treatment using Fly Ash. Ind. J. Environ. Health. 40(2): 177–188.

Guo, J., Lua, A. C. 1998. Characterization of Chars Pyrolyzed from Oil Palm Stone for the Preparation of Activated Carbons. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 46: 113–125.

Cheremisinoff, N. P. 2002. Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies. Butterworth-Heinemann, United State.

Wu, T. Y., Mohammad, A. W., Jahim, J. M., Anuar, N. 2010. Pollution Control Technologies for the Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) through End-of-Pipe Processes. J. Environ. Manage. 91(7): 1467–1490.

Arnal, J. M., Sancho, M., Verdú, G., Lora, J., Marín, J. F., Cháfer, J. 2004. Selection of the Most Suitable Ultrafiltration Membrane For Water Disinfection in Developing Countries. Desalination. 168: 265-270.

Hammer, M. J., Junior, M. J. H., Salim, M. R. 2005. Laboratory Chemical Analyses. Water and Wastewater Technology. 5th Ed. Prentice Hall, Singapore. 28–44.

Water Environment Federation. 2006. Membrane Systems for Wastewater Treatment. McGraw-Hill, USA.

Mohammadi, T. Esmaeelifar, A. 2005. Wastewater Treatment of a Vegetable Oil Factory by a Hybrid Ultrafiltration-Activated Carbon Process. J. Membr. Sci. 254: 129–137.

Scott, K., Mahmood, A.J., Jachuck, R.J., Hu, B. 2000. Intensified Membrane Filtration with Corrugated Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 173: 1–16.

Wang, P., Xu, N., Shi, J. 2000. A Pilot Study of the Treatment of Waste Rollingemulsion Using Zirconia Microfiltration Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 173: 159–166.

Brinck, J., Jonsson, A. S., Jonsson, B., Lindau, J. 2000. Influence of pH on the Adsorptive Fouling of Ultrafiltration Membranes by Fatty Acid. J. Membr. Sci. 164: 187–194.

Kang, S. K. Choo, K. H. 2005. Use of MF and UF Membranes for Reclamation of Glass Industry Wastewater Containing Collodial Clay and Glass Particles. J. Membr. Sci. 223: 89–103.

Nakatsuka, S., Michaels, A. S. 1992. Transport and Separation of Proteins by Ultrafiltration through Sorptive and Non-Sorptive Membrane. J. Membr Sci. 69: 189–211.

Ahmad, A. L., Ismail, S., Bahtia, S. 2005. Ultrafiltration Behavior in the Treatment of Agro Industry Effluent: Pilot Scale Studies. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60: 5385–5394.

Benito, J. M., Ebel, S., Guttierez, B., Pazos C., Coca J. 2001. Ultrafiltration of a Waste Emulsified Cutting Oil using Organic Membranes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 128: 181–195.

Salahi, A., Abbasi, M., Mohammadi, T. 2010. Permeate Flux Decline During UF of Oily Wastewater: Experimental and Modelling. Desalination. 251: 153–160.

Manttari, M., Pihlajamaki, A., Nysrom, M. 2006. Effect of pH on Hydrophilicity And Charge And Their Effect On The Filtration Efficiency Of NF Membranes At Different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 280: 311–320.

Das, R., Bhattacherjee, C., Ghosh, S. 2009. Effects of Operating Parameters and Nature ff Fouling Behavior in Ultrafiltration Of Sesame Protein Hydrolysate. Desalination. 237: 268–276.

Ahmad, A. L., Ibrahim, N., Ismail, S., Bhatia, S. 2002. Coagulation-Sedimentation-Extraction Pre-Treatment Method for the Removal of Suspended Solids and Residual Oil from Palm Oil Milll Effluent (POME). IIUM Engineering Journal. 3(1): 25–33

Ghosh, R. 2003. Protein Bioseparation using Ultrafiltration. Imperial College Press, London.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-02

How to Cite

Effect of Regenerated Cellulose of Ultrafiltration Membranes on POME Treatment. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 70(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3442