Drivers' Perceptions of Unsafe Driving Behaviors and Their Countermeasures: A Study in Saudi Arabia

Authors

  • Tanweer Hasan Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
  • Ishtiaque Ahmed Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hamid O. Al-Bar Department of Civil Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3486

Keywords:

Unsafe driver behavior, driver fatigue, fatigue countermeasures, truck driver behaviors, driver perceptions

Abstract

There is an increased public concern about the role of aggressive driving and "road rage" in crashes and traffic fatalities. There is no general agreement as to what constitutes aggressive driving. Consequently, the objective of the study was to survey of the perceptions on the specific unsafe driving acts. Perceptions and beliefs of drivers about unsafe and aggressive driving actions and their countermeasures are presented in this paper. The study primarily looked at the wide range of driver attitudes about speeding and other forms of unsafe driving behavior. The study was conducted in Jeddah, the second largest city of Saudi Arabia by interviewing a sample of 300 drivers. The results indicated that the drivers, in general, prefer to drive at higher speeds and could be considered as more aggressive compared to the drivers in the United States. The most dangerous reported driving act was "drive thru red light", followed by "racing another driver". Only 23% of the drivers thought that it was dangerous to drive over 30 km of the legal speed limits. The most often seen unsafe driving action was "speeding (70%), followed by "driving too closely (57%), "failing to use turn signals (53%), "drive inattentively (50%)", and "running red lights (43%)". The main causes of unsafe driving behaviors were "being in a hurry/time pressure (66%)", "aggressive behavior of others (52%)", and "refusing traffic rules (51%)". The countermeasure that was viewed to be the most effective in reducing unsafe driving behaviors was assigning more traffic police officers (66%). The study revealed that, more than half the drivers believed that more frequent ticketing (60%), doubling or tripling fines (54%), and doubling the length of imprisonment (53%) would be effective in reducing unsafe driving behaviors.

References

High Commission for the Development of ArRiyadh. 2006. Progress Report on Traffic Safety for ArRiyadh City. http://www.arriyadh.com/En/Researches/2006-progress-report-on-traffic-safe.doc_cvt.asp. Accessed June 10, 2008.

Grey, E. M., T. J. Triggs, and N. L. Haworth. 1989. Driver Aggression: the Role of Personality, Social Characteristics, Risk and Motivation. Report No. CR 81, Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra, Australia.

National Survey of Speeding and Other Unsafe Driving Actions. 1998. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Aggressive Driver Study. October 1999.

Ahuja, S. Simulation of Driver Behavior in Untidy Traffic. Proceedings of the 13th Mini EURO Transportation Conference, Bari, Italy, 2002.

Papp, I. and M. Papp. Behavior Study and Questionnaire Survey on Driver Aggression. Proceedings of the 13th ICTCT Conference, 1999.

Bureau of Statistics: Census Data 2004. Ministry of Planning, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-09

How to Cite

Drivers’ Perceptions of Unsafe Driving Behaviors and Their Countermeasures: A Study in Saudi Arabia. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 70(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3486