Speed–Flow–Geometry Relationships and Capacity for Two–Lane Single Carriageway Roads

Authors

  • Othman Che Puan Department of Geotechnic and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Nur Syahriza Muhamad Nor Department of Geotechnic and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zamri Bujang Department of Geotechnic and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3489

Keywords:

Capacity, analysis methods, Average Travel Speed (ATS), two lanes single carriageway

Abstract

The current Malaysian practice in road capacity analysis, Malaysian Highway Capacity Manual 2011 (MHCM) is based on a method adopted from the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM) of the United States. All the analysis elements appear to be taken directly from the manual. The rationale for using such a method for Malaysian conditions is not well defined. This paper deliberates the background of the methodology used in the development of speed, flow and geometry relationships and the capacity for single carriageway roads. A microscopic traffic simulation model which is capable of simulating traffic operations on single carriageway roads for a range of road geometry configurations and traffic flow conditions was developed and used to evaluate the potential capacity of a single carriageway road. The results of the analysis indicate that a two-lane single carriageway road is capable of accommodating traffic flow higher than the values derived from the previous HCM. The current version of the HCM also appears to underestimate the vehicles’ travel speed for a range of traffic flows when compared with the results of the simulation model. The MHCM 2011, on the other hand, estimated travel speeds higher than the travels speeds predicted by both the HCM 2010 and simulation model. It shows that there is a different interpretation of LOS F in term of speed between HCM 2010 and MHCM 2011.

References

Fred, L. M., Walter P. K. and Scott S. W. 2004. Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis. 3rd ed. The United States of America.

Othman Che Puan. 1999. A Simulation study of Speed and Capacity of Rural Single Carriageway Roads in Great Britain. PhD Thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Wales, U.K.

Duncan, N.C. 1976. A Note on Speed/Flow/Concentration Relations. Traffic Engineering and Control. 17(1): 34–35.

Duncan, N. C. 1979. A Further Look at Speed/Flow/Concentration. Traffic Engineering and Control. 20(10): 482–483.

Lee, B. H. and Brocklebank, P. J. 1993. Speed/Flow/Geometry Relationships for Rural Single Carriageway Roads. TRRL Contractor Report 319, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, U.K.

Transportation Research Board. 2010. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Academies, Washington, D.C.

Transportation Research Board. 2000. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Academies, Washington, D.C.

Department of Transport. 1997. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Vol. 5, Assessment And Preparation of Road Schemes, HMSO, London.

Peterson, B. E. 1977. Calculation of Capacity, Queue Length and Delay in Road Traffic Facilities. Traffic Engineering and Control. 18(6): 310–314.

Greenshield, B. D. 1935. A Study of Traffic Capacity, Proceeding of the 14th Annual Meeting Highway Research Board 1935, State Highway Department, Ohio.

Heydecker, B. G. and Addison, J. D. 2011. Analysis and Modelling of Traffic Flow Under Variable Speed Limits. Transportation Research Part C. 19: 206–217.

Garber, N. J. and Hoel, L. A. 2001. Traffic and Highway Engineering. 3rd ed. The United State of America.

Ministry of Works Malaysia. 2011. Malaysia Highway Capacity Manual 2011. Malaysia Highway Planning Unit, Kuala Lumpur.

Banks, J. H. 1989. Freeway Speed-flow-concentration Relationships-More Evidence and Interpretations. Transportation Research Record 1225. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 53–60.

Transportation Research Board. 1994. Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report 209. 3rd Edition, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Mahdi, T. A. 1991. The Effect of Overtaking Provision on the Operating Characteristics of Single Carriageway Roads. PhD Thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Wales, U.K.

Salter, R. J. and Hounsell, N. B. 1996. Highway Traffic Analysis and Design. 3rd Edition, MacMillan Press Ltd., London

Downloads

Published

2014-09-09

How to Cite

Speed–Flow–Geometry Relationships and Capacity for Two–Lane Single Carriageway Roads. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 70(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3489