An Investigation Into Qualitative Differences Between Bus Users and Operators for Intercity Travel in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3491Keywords:
Bus users’ satisfaction, perception, bus quality attributes, trip characteristics, bus quality characteristicsAbstract
Public transport usage in Malaysia is showing a downward trend. Despite major improvements implemented as well as intended for public transport, the bus user satisfaction is constantly on a decline. This study investigated qualitative differences between bus users and operators based on 11 pre-selected quality attributes for an intercity travel in Malaysia with a predominant public transport mode– the Bus. The perceptions were measured via responses on a likert scale to establish differences. Perceptual, socio-economic and trip data were collected using questionnaire from bus users and operators on a pre-selected route-Johor Bahru to Kuala Lumpur (JB-KL). Analyses used statistical tools particularly correlation analyses, step-wise multiple regression analyses, Mann Whitney test methods and Wilcoxon test. Quadrant analyses established relationship between relative importance and satisfaction from quality attributes. Results indicate significant correlation differences in both groups on attributes viz. ‘bus fares’ ‘travel comfort’, ‘travel convenience’, ‘ticket availability’ and the ‘facilities at the bus terminal’. Study revealed significant gaps in the understanding about the composition of bus service-quality by operators. Alternate hypothesis were rejected as bus users and operators reveal significant perception differences on quality attributes–‘bus fares’, ‘travel comfort’ and ‘bus staff behaviour’. The satisfaction levels of four extremely important quality attributes viz. ‘bus fares’, ‘travel comfort’, ‘bus staff behaviour’ and ‘bus user security’ were found low to average. Similarly major deterrents of the bus patronage were appraised. In this endeavour, the research exploited knowledge of perceptions to suggest quality attributes that are necessary to improve public transport ridership and consequently the modal share of public transport in Malaysia.References
A. S. I. Almselati, R. Rahmat, O. Jaafar. 2011. An Overview of Urban Transport in Malaysia. Social Sci. 6: 24–33.
A. Nurdden, R. A. O. Rahmat, A. Ismail. 2007. Effect of Transportation Policies on Modal Shift from Private Car to Public Transport in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences. 7(7).
H. Hussein, N. M. Yaacob 2012. Development of Accessible Design in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 68: 121–133.
S. Tamrin. 2013. Only 5% Using Public Transport During Morning Peak Period. The Star. December 3, 2013.
A. Minhans, A. Moghaddasi. 2013. Transport Cost Analysis of City Bus and Private Car Usage in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi. 65(3).
Z. Zakaria, Z. H. Hussin, M. F. A Batau, Z. Zakaria. 2010. Service Quality of Malaysian Public Transports: A Case Study in Malaysia. Cross-Cultural Communication. 6(2).
D. A. Lashof, D. R. Ahuja. 1990. Relative Contributions of Greenhouse Gas Emissions tTo Global Warming. Nature Weekly Journal of Science. Nature Publishing Group.
D. L. Greene, S. Plotkin. 2011. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emission From US Transportation. Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Environmental Protection Agency. United States. http://www.epa.gov.
W. Ross Morrow, K. S. Gallagher, G. Collantes, H. Lee. 2010. Analysis of Policies to Reduce Oil Consumption and Greenhouse-gas Emissions From The US Transportation Sector. Energy Policy. 38(3): 1305–1320.
S. N. Salahudin, M. M. Abdullah, N. A. Newaz. 2013. Emissions: Sources, Policies and Development in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Research. 1(7).
V. R. Vuchic. 2007. Urban Transit Systems and Technology. ISBN: 978-0-471-75823-5.Wiley Publishing.
A. Minhans, N. H. Zaki, R. Belwal. 2013. Traffic Impact Assessment: A Case of Proposed Hypermarket in Skudai Town of Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi. 65(3).
A. R. M. Nor .2004. Transport for the Under-served in Malaysia: The Roles of Minibuses in Malaysian Towns and Cities. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
M. A.Rahim, A. C. Er., R. Katiman, M. Aishah, S. Zaini, M. N. Hasan, A. C. R. Rosniza. Assessing Public Transport Service Attributes Using Factor Analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2011;13(13 Special Issue):07–12.
O. C. Chuen, M. R. Karim, S. Yusoff. 2014. Mode Choice Between Private and Public Transport In Klang Valley, Malaysia. The Scientific World Journal.
A. Ellaway, S. Macintyre, R. Hiscock, A. Kearns.2003. In the Driving Seat: Psychosocial Benefits from Private Motor Vehicle Transport Compared to Public Transport. Transportation Research Part F. Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 6(3): 217–231.
G. Beirão, J. Sarsfield Cabral. 2007. Understanding Attitudes Towards Public Transport and Private Car: A Qualitative Study. Transport Policy. 14(6): 478–489.
C. Dhingra, S. Kodukula. 2010. Public Bicycle Schemes: Applying the Concept in Developing Cities. GTZ Sustainbale Urban Project. New Delhi. 32.
D. Aßmann, N. Sieber. 2005. Transport in Developing Countries: Renewable Energy Versus Energy Reduction? Transport Reviews. 25(6): 719–738.
D. L. Greene, M. Wegener. 1997. Sustainable Transport. Journal of Transport Geography. 5(3): 177–190.
J. Anable. 2005. ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying Travel Behaviour Segments Using Attitude Theory. Transport Policy. 12(1): 65–78.
R. Belwal, A. Minhans, A. M. Al-Balushi. 2013. Perception of Taxi Services in Oman–A Cross Examination of Citizens’ and Taxi Drivers’ Perception. Jurnal Teknologi. 65(3).
R. L. Oliver. 2010. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. 2nd Edition. ME Sharpe. Armonk, NewYork.
O. A. Budiono. 2009. Customer Satisfaction in Public Bus Transport. Master of Service Science Program. Karlstad University, Sweden.
A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, L. L. Berry. 1994. Alternative Scales for Measuring Service Quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing. 70(3): 201–230.
B. Gatersleben, D. Uzzell. 2003. Local Transport Problems and Possible Solutions: Comparing Perceptions of Residents, Elected Members, Officers and Organisations. Local Environment. 8(4): 387–405.
B. Gatersleben, D. Uzzell. 2007. Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute Comparing Perceptions of Drivers, Cyclists, Walkers, and Users of Public Transport. Environment and Behavior. 39(3): 416–431.
P. Goodwin, G. Lyons. 2010. Public Attitudes to Transport: Interpreting the Evidence. Transportation Planning and Technology. 33(1):3–17.
P. Goodwin, G. Lyons. 2009. Public Attitudes to Transport: Scrutinising the Evidence. Proceedings of the 41st Universities Transport Study Group Conference. London, UK, 5-7 January 2009.
S. Fujii, T. Gärling, R. Kitamura. 2001. Changes in Drivers’ Perceptions and Use of Public Transport during a Freeway Closure Effects of Temporary Structural Change on Cooperation in a Real-Life Social Dilemma. Environment and Behavior. 33(6): 796–808.
M. Vugt, R. M. Meertens, P. A. Lange. 1995. Car Versus Public Transportation? The Role of Social Value Orientations in a Realâ€Life Social Dilemma1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 25(3): 258–278.
M. Fellesson, M. Friman. 2012. Perceived Satisfaction with Public Transport Service In Nine European Cities. In: Journal of the Transportation Research Forum. 3.
L. Eboli, G. Mazzulla. 2007. Service Quality Attributes Affecting Customer Satisfaction for Bus Transit. Journal of Public Transportation. 2007. Citeseer.
M. Friman. 2004. Implementing Quality Improvements in Public Transport. Journal of Public Transportation. 7(4).
M. J. Smith, R. V. Clarke. 2000. Crime and Public Transport. Crime And Justice. 169–233.
L. Chapman. 2007. Transport and Climate Change: A Review. Journal of Transport Geography. 15(5): 354–367.
Research Results Digest. 2009. Public Transportation’s Role in Addressing Global Climate Change. Transit Cooperative Research Program.
Research Results Digest. 2010. Performance Measurement and Outcomes. Transit Cooperative Research Program.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.