A Comparative Review of the Making of Urban Transport Policies in Metropolitan Areas in Southeast Asia

Authors

  • Matthias Mueth Project Manager, Hamburg-Consult GmbH, Spohrstrasse 6, 22083 Hamburg, Germany
  • Anil Minhans Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3492

Keywords:

Urban transport, transport systems, transport policy, policy field analysis

Abstract

The urban transport systems are primarily the result of political decision-making processes, and only secondarily a matter of technical necessity or technical possibility, because every individual or group does have vested interests in transport policies, which are often conflicting if not inherently incompatible. What constitutes the so-called “common good†is not a technical question but ultimately a political one – while its implementation requires the suitable technical solution. This “comparative review of the making of urban transport policies in metropolitan areas of Singapore and Bangkok†analyses (1) the “input†of different actors into the political decision-making process, (2) how this input is processed by the various actors in government and administration, including the interaction of all participatory actors, and (3) finally how the results of these processes influence the form of the actual transport systems. The results are based on the research of the different polities influencing transport-related decisions in cities of Singapore and Bangkok. The process of decision-making is analysed using seven illustrative examples from these cities and the assessment of the transport systems is made according to pre-defined quantitative and qualitative data. This adopted approach is along the lines of classical policy-field analysis: In this study it examines the policy field of urban transport and draws conclusions, which are specific to the chosen cities and general to the policy field.

References

R. O. Ackermann, K. M. Gwilliam, L. S. Thompson. 1998. The World Bank, Transport, and the Environment. Japan Railway & Transport Review. 31–39.

R. J. Allport. 1990. Transport and Development in Asia. World Bank. Washington D.C.

D. Appleyard. 1971. Social and Environmental Policies for Transportation in the 1970s. Berkeley

C. Arnott. 1996. Case Study of Transportation and Development in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Bangkok. Stubbs, Jeffry & Clarke, Giles (Eds.). 411–435.

D. Banister. 1994. Transport Planning. London.

Banister, David (Ed.). 1998. Transport Policy and the Environment. London.

P. Barter. 1999. An International Comparative Perspective on Urban Transport and Urban Form in Pacific Asia: The Challenge of Rapid Motorisation in Dense Cities. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University. Perth.

P. Barter, J. Kenworthy. 1999. Transport and Urban Form in ASEAN Cities: An International Comparatative Perspective. City Trans Asia ’95 Conference. 1995. Singapore.

P. Barter, A. Rahman. 2000. An Overview of Asian Urban Transport: Conditions and Trends: CITYNET UN-ESCAP, Regional Policy Seminar on Transportation and Communication Challenges for Urban Local Governments in the 21st Century. 08.-10.11.2000. Kuala Lumpur. Technical Paper 1.

P. Barter, A. Rahmen, Tamin 2000. Taking Steps: A Community Action Guide to People-Centred, Equitable and Sustainable Urban Transport. Published by the Sustainable Transport Action Network for Asia and the Pacific (SUSTRAN). Kuala Lumpur.

J. Gomey-Ibanez. 1991. A Global View on Automobile Dependence. A Review of Cities and Automobile Dependence: International Sourcebook. Journal of the American Planning Association. 57(3): 376–379.

C. Hunter, J. Farrington, W. Walton. 1998. Transport and the Environment. 2nd Edition. Hoyle & Knowles (Eds.). 97–114.

Independent Commission on Transport. 1974. Changing Directions. London.

G. Ingram, L. Zhi. 1997. Motorization and the Provision of Roads in Countries and Cities. World Bank Working Papers 1842. Washington D.C.

G. Ingram, L. Zhi. 1998. Vehicles, Roads, and Road Use: Alternative Empirical Specifications. World Bank Paper 2036. Washington D.C.

G. Ingram, L. Zhi. 1999. Determinants of Motorization and Road Provision. World Bank Working Papers 2042. Washington D.C.

J. Kenworthy. 2002. Discussion: Traffic 2042–A More Global Perspective. Transport Policy. 9: 11–15.

J. R. Kenworthy, F. B. Laube. 1999. An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities. 1960–1990. Boulder.

J. R. Kenworthy, F. B. Laube. 2001. UITP Millennium Cities Database for Sustainable Transport. International Union (Association) of Public Transport (UITP). Brussels.

C. Lave. 1992. Cars and Demographics. 4–11.

A. D. Little. 1972. Southeast Asian Regional Transport Survey. Book One. Prepared by Arthur D. Little Inc. and Associated Consultants. Asian Development Bank. Singapore.

A. Minhans. 2008. Der Beitrag von Verkehrsmanagement-Strategien bei Katastrophenplaenen. Doctoral Dissertation. Darmstadt University of Technology. Darmstadt. Germany.

A. Minhans, A. Moghaddasi.2013. Transport Cost Analysis of City Bus and Private Car Usage in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi. 65(3): 25–31.

M. Mueth. 2000. Public Participation in Making Urban Transport Policies. The Cases of Singapore and Bangkok. Presentation to the Asian Institute of Technology. Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.

M. Mueth. 2003. Verkehrspolitik in Metropolen Südostasiens. Politische Entscheidungsprozesse im Spannungsfeld gesellschaftlicher Interessen: der Personennahverkehr in Singapur und Bangkok. Hamburg. Germany.

P. Newman, J. Kenworthy. 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Gower.

P. Newman, J. Kenworthy. 1999. Sustainability and Cities. Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, USA.

Office of the Commission for the Management of Land Traffic. 1996. Traffic Management in Bangkok. The Transport Planning & Policy Project. Bangkok. Thailand.

Trunk Roads and the Generation of Traffic. Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Roads Assessment (SACTRA). 1994. HSMO. London.

Seah Chee Meow. 1975. Some Key Issues in Singapore’s Domestic Transportation: Who gets where, when, and how? In: ISEAS, Southeast Asian Perspectives, No. 3, November 1975, hier Manuskriptversion aus NUS-Library.

C. M. Seah. 1978. Infrastructural Growth and Developmental Planning: A Comparative Study of Road Infrastructure in the National Development of ASEAN Countries. Singapore.

C. M. Seah. 1980. Government Policy Choices and Public Transport Operations in Singapore. Transport Policy and Decision Making. 1(2&3): 231–251.

C. M. Seah. 1980. Mass mobility and Accessibility: Transport planning and traffic management in Singapore. Transport Policy and Decision Making. 1(1): 55–71.

C. M. Seah. 1981. The MRT Debate in Singapore. To Do or Not To Do?†Southeast Asian Affairs. Singapore Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. 290–306.

C. M. Seah, J. S. T. Quah, H. C. Chang. 1987. Public Transportation: Government & Politics of Singapore. Singapore. 259–275.

J. M. Thomson. 1977. Great Cities and their Traffic. London.

M. Weber. 1972. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Nachdruck. Tübingen. Germany.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-09

How to Cite

A Comparative Review of the Making of Urban Transport Policies in Metropolitan Areas in Southeast Asia. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 70(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3492