Effective Thickness of Bedding Sand Layer for Shell Groove-Underside Shaped Concrete Blocks for Pavement

Authors

  • M. Azman Department of Engineering, Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, International Campus, Jalan Semarak, Kuala Kumpur, Malaysia
  • M. N. Hasanan Department of Geotechnic and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • M. R. Hainin Department of Geotechnic and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • N. A. K. Hafizah Construction Research Centre (UTM CRC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3503

Keywords:

Underside shaped concrete block, concrete block pavement, bedding sand thickness

Abstract

Underside Shaped Concrete Block (USCB) is a groove shaped block on the underside surface. The USCB concept utilizes groove pattern to grip and produce better resistance to the underside surface of block units onto the bedding sand layer. However, the horizontal movement of block units is the major problem in pavement due to vehicle braking and accelerated action. This paper presents the laboratory evaluation on vertical and horizontal displacement of shell groove-USCB pavement laid onto different bedding sand layer thickness. The bedding sand layer thickness an essential parameter to produce better USCB’s performance. A series of laboratory scale test were conducted to study USCB type of the Shell-Rectangular 15 mm (Shell-R15) laid on three different loose bedding sand layer thicknesses of 50 mm,  70 mm and 90 mm respectively.  Then, push-in loading test and horizontal loading test were performed.    The result indicates, the bedding sand layer thickness has significant influence to the vertical and horizontal displacement to USCB Shell-R15 compared to control of 50 mm loose bedding sand layer thickness. The loose bedding sand layer thickness of 70 mm performed better compared to others.

References

Lilley, A. A. and Dowson, A. J. 1988. Laying Course Sand for Concrete Block Paving. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Concrete Block Paving. Rome. 457–462.

Panda, B. C. and Ghosh, A. K. 2002. Structural Behaviour of Concrete Block Paving; I:Sand in Bed and Joints. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 128(2): 123–129.

Beaty, A. N. S. and Raymond, G. P. 1992. Geotechnical Aspects of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements. Proceedings of the 45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. 41–1/41–7.

Eisenmann, J. and Leykauf, G. 1988. Design of Concrete Block Pavement in FRG. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Concrete Block Paving. Pavi- Italia, Rome, 149–155.

Huurman, M. 1997. Permanent Deformation in Concrete Block Pavements. PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Simmons, M. J. 1979. Construction of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements. Australian Road Research Report. ARR No. 90: 71–80.

Lilley, A. A. 1980. A Review of Concrete Paving in The UK Over the Last Five Years. Proc. 1st Int. Conference on Concrete Block Paving. September 2–5, Newcastle Upon Tyne, 40–44.

Nur Izzi Md Yusoff, Mohd Rosli Hainin, and Hasanan Md Nor. 2012. Cirian Pasir Pengisi Sambungan Turapan Blok Konkrit Saling Mengunci pada Jarak Sambungan dan Kecerunan yang Berbeza. Sains Malaysiana. 41(1): 103–110.

Ling, T. C., Hasanan Md Nor, M. Rosli Hainin, and Lim, S. K. 2010. Long-term Strength of Rubberised Concrete Paving Blocks. Construction Materials. 163(1): 19–26.

British Standard Institution. 2002. Aggregates for Concrete. BS EN 12620+A1. London.

British Standards Institution. 2001. Precast Unreinforced Concrete Paving Blocks–Requirements and Test Methods. BS 6717. London.

Ling, T. C., Nor, H. M., and Hainin, M. R. 2009. Properties of Crumb Rubber Concrete Paving Blocks with SBR Latex. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 10(1): 213–222.

Shackel, B. 1990. Developments In The Specification Of Concrete Segmental Pavers For Australian Conditions. University of New South Wales, Australia: Department of Geotechnical Engineering. 56–64.

Frank, J. M. V. 1994. The Performance of Bedding Sands in Concrete Block Pavements. Master Dissertation. University of New Brunswick

Ling, T., Nor, H., Hainin, M. R., and Chik, A. A. 2009. Laboratory Performance of Crumb Rubber Concrete Block Pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 10(5): 361–374.

Cement And Concrete Association Of Australia. 1986. A Specification for Construction of Interlocking Concrete Road Pavement. (TN56).

British Standard Institution. 2009. Pavements Constructed With Clay, Natural Stone or Concrete Pavers-Part 3. BS 7533-3:2005+A1. London.

Azman, M. 2004. Prestasi Sambungan Turapan Penguncian Blok Konkrit Menggunakan Pasir Pengalas Dengan Bahan Tambah Simen. Master Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Johor Bahru, Johor.

Azman Mohamed. 2014. Performance of Underside Shaped Concrete Blocks for Pavement. PhD Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Johor Bahru, Johor.

Azman, M., Hasanan, M. N., Hainin, M. R., Haryati Yaacob, Che Ros Ismail, and Nur Hafizah, A. K. 2013. The Effect of Groove-Underside Shaped Concrete Block on Pavement Permanent Deformation. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering). 61(3 ): 7–14.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-09

How to Cite

Effective Thickness of Bedding Sand Layer for Shell Groove-Underside Shaped Concrete Blocks for Pavement. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 70(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3503