FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF SPECIAL REINFORCED LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE BEAM FOR INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM (IBS)

Authors

  • Chun-Chieh Yip Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Kadir Marsono Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Jing-Ying Wong Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mugahed Y. H. Amran Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.3505

Keywords:

Industrialised Building System (IBS), special reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete (SRLWAC), experimental test, finite element analysis, ultimate flexural capacity

Abstract

Special reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete (SRLWAC) beam is designed as beam component in Industrialised Building System (IBS). It is used to overcome the difficulties during the component installation due to the heavy lifting task. This paper presents the flexural strength and performance of SRLWAC beam under vertical static load. SRLWAC beam was set-up on two columns corbel and tested under monotonic vertical load. Five Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs) were instrumented in the model to record displacement. The ultimate flexural capacity of the beam was obtained at the end of experiment where failure occurred. Performance of the beam was evaluated in load-displacement relationship of beam and mode of failure. SRLWAC beam was then modelled and simulated by nonlinear finite element software- Autodesk Simulation Mechanical. Result from finite element analysis was verified by experimental result. Maximum mid-span displacement, Von-Mises stress, concrete maximum principal stress, and yielding strength of reinforcement were discussed in this paper. The beam was behaved elastically up to 90 kN and deformed plastically until ultimate capacity of 250.1 kN in experimental test. The maximum mid span displacement for experimental and simulation were 15.21 mm and 15.36 mm respectively. The major failure of IBS SRLWAC beam was the splitting of the concrete and yielding of main reinforcements at overlay end. Ductility ratio of IBS SRLWAC beam was 14.2, which was higher than pre-stressed concrete beam.

References

Lachimpadi, S.K., Pereira, J.J., Mohd Raihan, T., and Mokhtar, M. 2012. Construction Waste Minimisation Comparing Conventional and Precast Construction (Mixed System and IBS) Methods in High-Rise Buildings: A Malaysia Case Study. Journal of Resource, Conservation and Recycling. 68: 96-103.

Ahmad Bari, N. A., Yusuff, R., Ismail, N., Jaapar, A., and Ahmad, N. 2011. Factors Influencing the Construction Cost of Industrialised Building System (IBS) Projects. Conference Paper of Social and Behavioural Science. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences. 35: 689-696.

Kamarul, K. M. M., Zuhairi, A. H., Ghani, M. K., and Rahim, A. H. 2007. Industrialised Building System: Current Shortcomings and the Vital Role of R&D. Construction Research Institute of Malaysia, Master Builders 2nd Quarter. 62-65.

Mohd Bohari, A. A., Kumalasari, K., and Mahat, N. 2012. Industrialised Building System (IBS) in Sarawak Construction Industry. International Conference Paper on Innovation, Management and Technology Research (ICIMTR2012). 433-437.

Yunus, R., and Yang, J. 2011. Sustainability Criteria for Industrialised Building Systems (IBS) in Malaysia. Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference Paper on Structural Engineering and Construction. Procedia Engineering. 14: 1590-1598.

CIDB. 2010. Industrialised Building System (IBS) Roadmap 2003-2010. Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia, Construction Technology Development Division, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1-24.

Marwan, T. S., Wael, W. E. and Robert, G.D. 2011. Seismic Response Modification Factor for Reinforced Masonry Structural Walls. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 25(2): 74-86.

Payam, S., Jumaat, M. Z., and Mahmud, H. 2010. Oil Palm Shell as a Lightweight Aggregate for Production High Strength Lightweight Concrete. Journal of Construction and building Materials. 25: 1848-1853.

Zhu, Y. J., Li, L. and Yang, W. H. 2011. Study on Shear Bearing Capacity of Composite Reinforced Concrete Block Masonry. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Materials. 94-96: 1141-1145.

Marwan, T. S., Wael, W. E. and Robert, G. D. 2010. Alternative Strategies to Enhance the Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Block Shear Wall System. Journal of Structural Engineering. 136(6): 676-689.

Gerasimos, M. K. 2011. Assessment of the Flexural Capacity of RC Beam/Column Elements Allowing for 3d Effect. Journal of Engineering Structure. 2772-2780.

Catarina, F., Jose, M., Humberto, V. and Anibal, C. 2011. Cyclic Behaviour of a Two-Span RC Beam Built with Plain Reinforcing Bars. Journal of Civil Engineering. 21-29.

Xie, J. H., Zhao, J. X., and Huang, P. Y. 2011. Debonding Prediction of RC Beam Flexurally Strengthened with Pre-Stressed FRP. Advanced Materials Research. 163-167: 3766-3771.

Ramadevi, K., Venkatesh, B.D.L. and Venkatasubramani, R. 2013. Seismic Behaviour of Hybrid Fibre Reinforced Concrete Bare Frames. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 5(5).

Alengaram, U. J., Mahmud, H., and Jumaat, M. Z. 2010. Development of Lightweight Concrete Using Industrial Waste Material, Palm Kernel Shell as Lightweight Aggregate and Its Properties. 2nd International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering. 27-281.

Senthilnathan, D., Gnanavel, B. A., Bhaskar, G. B., and Gopinath, K. G. S. 2014. Characterization of Glass Fibre–Coconut Coir– Human Hair Hybrid Composites. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 6(1).

Jumaat, M. Z., Alengaram, U. J., and Mahmud, H. 2009. Shear Strength of Oil Palm Shell Concrete Beams. Journal of Materials and Design. 30: 2227-2236.

Mahdi, S., Ramlisulong, N. H., Sinaei, H., Mohammad Mehdi, A. K. and Payam, S. 2011. Behaviour of Channel Shear Connectors in Normal and Lightweight Aggregate Concrete (Experimental and Analytical Study). Journal of Advanced Materials Research. 168-170: 2303-2307.

Lestuzzi, P. and Badoux, M. 2003. The Gamma-model: A Simple Hysteretic Model for Reinforced Concrete Walls. Proceeding of the fib-Symposium: Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions. 1-12.

Eurocode 2. 2004. Design of Concrete Structure–Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. (EN 1992-1-1:2004), European Committee for Standardization, Management centre, 36 B-1050 Brussels.

British Standard Institution. 2009. BS EN 12390-5: 2009. London: British Standard Institution.

Marsono, A. K., Wong, J. Y., Md. Tap., M., Yip, C. C., and Haddadi, A. 2015. Standard Verification Test for Industrialised Building System (IBS) Repetitive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 26: 252-257.

Hibbeler, R. C. 2008. Mechanics of Materials. Singapore: Prentice Hall.

Kwan, A. K. H. and Au, F. T. K. 2004. Flexural Strength-ductility Performance of Flanged Beam Section Cast of High-Strength concrete. Journal of the Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 13: 29-43.

Shaikh, A. F. 2010. PCI Design Handbook-Precast and Pre-Stressed Concrete. USA: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.

Guray, A. and Ercan, C. 2010. Curvature Ductility Prediction of Reinforced High Strength Concrete Beam Sections. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 462-470.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-21

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF SPECIAL REINFORCED LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE BEAM FOR INDUSTRIALISED BUILDING SYSTEM (IBS). (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.3505