MULTIPLE TIME-SCALES NONLINEAR PREDICTION OF RIVER FLOW USING CHAOS APPROACH

Authors

  • Nur Hamiza Adenan Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 UPSI Perak, Malaysia
  • Mohd Salmi Md Noorani School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.3561

Keywords:

Chaos approach, multiple time-scales, nonlinear prediction, river flow

Abstract

River flow prediction is important in determining the amount of water in certain areas to ensure sufficient water resources to meet the demand. Hence, an analysis and prediction of multiple time-scales data for daily, weekly and 10-day averaged time series were performed using chaos approach. An analysis was conducted at the Tanjung Tualang station, Malaysia. This method involved the reconstruction of a single variable in a multi-dimensional phase space. River flow prediction was performed using local linear approximation. The prediction result is close to agreement with a high correlation coefficient for each time scale. The analysis suggests that the presence of low dimensional chaos as an optimal embedding dimension exists when the inverse method is adopted. In addition, a comparison of the prediction performance of chaos approach, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and least squares support vector machines (LSSVM) were performed. The comparative analysis shows that all methods provide comparable predictions. However, chaos approach provides a simpler means of analysis since it only use a scalar time series (river flow data). Therefore, the relevant authorities may use this prediction result for the creation of a water management system for local benefit.

References

Ghani, A. A., Zakaria N. A., Kiat C. C., Ariffin J., Hasan Z. A., and Abdul Ghaffar A. B. 2007. Revised Equations For Manning’s Coefficient For Sand Bed Rivers. International Journal of River Basin Management. 5(4): 329-346.

Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia. 2011. Review of national Water Resources Study (2000-2050) and Formulation of National Water Resources Policy, On line at: http://www.water.gov.my/images/Hidrologi/NationalWaterResourcesStudy/Vol13Perak.pdf.

Mashor, M. Y. 2002. On-line Short-term Streamflow Forecasting using Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Fourth International FRIEND Conference. South Africa. 205-212.

Azamathulla, H. M., Ghani, A. A., Leow, C. S., Chang, C. K., and Zakaria, N. A. 2011. Gene-Expression Programming for the Development of a Stage-Discharge Curve of the Pahang River. Water Resource Management. 25(11): 2901-2916.

Yaacob, M. S., Jamaluddin, H. and Harun, S. 2005. Rule-based Fuzzy Logic System. The Journal of The Institution of Engineers. 66(4): 23-28.

Ghani, A. A., Azamathulla, H. M., Chang, C. K., Zakaria, N. A. and Hasan, Z. A. 2010. Prediction of Total Bed Material Load for Rivers in Malaysia: A Case Study of Langat, Muda and Kurau Rivers. Environmental Fluid Mechanics. 11(3): 307-318.

Shabri, A., Suhartono. 2012. Streamflow Forecasting using Least-squares Support Vector Machines. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 57(7): 1275-1293.

Sivakumar, B., Jayawardena, A. W. and Fernando, T. M. K. G. 2002. River Flow Forecasting: Use of Phase-Space Reconstruction and Artificial Neural Networks Approaches. Journal of Hydrology. 265(1-4): 225-245.

Zakaria, Z. A. 2012. Streamflow Forecasting at Ungauged Sites using Support Vector Machines. Applied Mathematical Sciences. 6(60): 3003-3014.

Hosking, J. R. M. and Wallis, J. R. 2005. Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L-Moments. Cambridge: University Press.

Jain, A. and Kumar, A. M. 2007. Hybrid Neural Network Models for Hydrologic Time Series Forecasting. Applied Soft Computing. 7(2): 585-592.

Salas, J. D., Tabios III, G. Q. and Bartolini, P. 1985. Approaches to Multivariate Modeling of Water Resources Time Series. Water Resource Bulletin. 4(21): 683-708.

Jayawardena, A. W. and Lai, F. 1994. Analysis and Prediction of Chaos In Rainfall and Stream Flow Time Series. Journal of Hydrology. 153(1-4): 23-52.

Ng, W. W., Panu, U. S. and Lennox, W.C. 2007. Chaos Based Analytical Techniques for Daily Extreme Hydrological Observations. Journal of Hydrology. 342(1-2): 17-41.

Wang, W., Van Gelder, P. H. and Vrijling, J. 2005. Is the Streamflow Process Chaotic? International Symposium Stochastic Hydraulic. Spain. 162-164.

Khatibi, R., Sivakumar, B., Ghorbani, M. A., Kisi, O., Koçak, K., and Farsadi Zadeh, D. 2012. Investigating Chaos in River Stage and Discharge Time Series. Journal of Hydrology. 414-415: 108-117.

Sivakumar, B. 2003. Forecasting Monthly Streamflow Dynamics in the Western United States: A Nonlinear Dynamical Approach. Environmental Modelling & Software. 18(8-9): 721-728.

Sivakumar, B. 2002. A Phase-Space Reconstruction Approach to Prediction of Suspended Sediment Concentration in Rivers. Journal of Hydrology. 258(1-4): 149-162.

Takens, F. 1981. Detecting Strange Attractor in Turbulence. Lectures Note in Mathematics. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Abarbanel, H. 1996. Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data. Berlin: Springer.

Adenan, N. H. and Noorani, M. S. M. 2015. Peramalan Data Siri Masa Aliran Sungai di Dataran Banjir dengan menggunakan Pendekatan Kalut. Sains Malaysiana. 44(3): 463-471.

Islam, M. and Sivakumar, B. 2002. Characterization and Prediction of Runoff Dynamics: A Nonlinear Dynamical View. Advances in Water Resources. 25(2): 179-190.

Sangoyomi, A., Lall, L. and Abarbanel, H. D. I. 1996. Nonlinear Dynamics of the Great Salt Lake: Dimension Estimation. Water Resource Research. 32(1): 149-159.

Adenan, N. H. and Noorani. 2014. Nonlinear Prediction of River Flow in Different Watershed Acreage. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 18(7): 2268-2274.

Velickov, S. 2004. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

Gazzaz, N. M., Yusoff, M. K., Ramli, M. F., Aris, A. Z. and Juahir, H. 2012. Characterization of Spatial Patterns in River Water Quality using Chemometric Pattern Recognition Techniques. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 64(4): 688-98.

Regonda, S., Sivakumar, B. and Jain, A. 2004. Temporal Scaling in River Flow : Can It Be Chaotic?. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 49(3): 373-386.

Casdagli, M. 1989. Nonlinear Prediction of Chaotic Time Series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 35(3): 335-356.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

MULTIPLE TIME-SCALES NONLINEAR PREDICTION OF RIVER FLOW USING CHAOS APPROACH. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.3561