Open Plan Office Design Features Affecting Staff’s Health and Well-being Status
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3583Keywords:
Open plan design, office building design, workplace assessment, staff health, staff well-being, productivity, performance, social sustainable buildingAbstract
Sustainable office building indoor environment design is a challengeable issue for professionals in thermal comfort, satisfaction, health, and energy fields of research. The professionals intensively need a comprehensive list of office indoor environment design features to promote the level of performance and productivity of staff. One of the most effective factors dealing with staff performance and productivity is physical and psychological health which has not yet been investigated in depth is open-plan office design. In this regard, the current research aimed at establishing a comprehensive list of Open Plan Offices Design (OPOD) features affecting physical and psychological health and well-being of the staff at office buildings. Research methodology engaged two phases corresponding to two objectives. Phase one was to investigate OPOD features and sub-features through a critical literature review using fishbone cause-and-effect analysis technique. Phase one has clustered the OPOD features into two; positive and negative classes. The cause-and-effect analysis determined 3 positive features and 5 negative features involved in the positive and negative classes, respectively. The Efficient Workflow and Performance, Flexible Design, and Cost Efficient were identified as positive OPOD features which involves a number of sub-features. The Distraction, Decreasing Work Feedback, Job Dissatisfaction, Illness, and stress have been determined as OPOD features which impact negatively on staff’s health. The second phase conducted a content analysis on reviewed literatures to indicate the popularity of citation of each OPOD feature in previous studies. The content analysis determined in the Positive cluster, the sub-feature “Facilitate Communicationâ€, under Efficient Workflow & Performance was investigated more than other sub-features. In addition, in the Negative cluster, the sub-feature Auditory Distraction under Distraction was highly investigated. The research asserts that undertaking the research outputs will promote performance and productivity of staff in office buildings. Architects, facility managers, design consultants, and authority may use the output as a decision support checklist for future office design and/or renovations.
References
M. Brill, E. Keable, J. Fabiniak. 2000. The Myth of Open Plan. Facilities Design and Management. 19(2): 36–39.
A. T. Hundert, N. Greenfield. 1969. Physical Space and Organizational Behavior: A Study of an Office Landscape. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (APA). 601–602.
C. J. G. Marquardt, J. A. Veitch, K. E. Charles. 2000. Environmental Satisfaction with Open-Plan Office Furniture Design and Layout. Institute for Research in Construction, Canada.
H. B. Lamit, A. Shafaghat, M. Z. Majid, A. Keyvanfar, M. H. B. Ahmad, T. A. Malik. The Path Walkability Index (PAWDEX) Model: To Measure Built Environment Variables Influencing Residents' Walking Behavior. Advanced Science Letters. 19(10): 3017–3020.
M. Z. Abd Majid; W. Z. Zakaria; H. Lamit; A. Keyvanfar; A. Shafaghat; E. S. Bakti. 2012. Construction Information Systems for Executive Management in Monitoring Work Progress. Advanced Science Letters.  15(1): 169–171.
H. B. Lamit; A. Shafaghat; M. Z. Abd. Majid; A. Keyvanfar; Mohd Hamdan Bin Ahmad; T. A. Malik; Rosli Bin Zin; Mohammadreza Yadollahi. Application of the Path Walkability Index (Pawdex) Model: A Case Study of Retail Walking Pattern Recognition in Taman University Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters. 19(10): 3021–3024
E. Sundstrom, R. Kring Herbert. 1982. Privacy and Communication in an Open-Plan Office-A Case Study. Environment and Behavior. 14(3): 379–392. doi: 10.1177/0013916582143007.
L. K. Block, G. S. Stokes. 1989. Performance and Satisfaction in Private versus Nonprivate Work Settings. Environment and Behavior. 21(3): 277–297. doi: 10.1177/0013916589213003.
A. Crouch, U. Nimran. 1989. Perceived Facilitators and Inhibitors of Work Performance in an Office Environment. Environment and Behavior. 21(2): 206–226. doi: 10.1177/0013916589212004.
A. Hedge. 1980. The Open-Plan Office A Systematic Investigation of Employee Reactions to Their Work Environment. Environment and Behavior. 14: 519. doi: 10.1177/0013916582145002.
M. J. O'Neill, P. Carayon. 1993. The Relationship between Privacy, Control, and Stress Responses in Office Workers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 37(7): 479–483. doi: 10.1177/154193129303700702.
G. R. Oldham. 1988. Effects of Changes in Workspace Partitions and Spatial Density on Employee Reactions: A Quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73: 253–258.
R. Woods, D. Canter. 1970. The Effect of the Meaning of Buildings on Behavior. Applied Ergonomics. 1: 144–150.
M. D. Zalesny, R. V. Farace. 1987. Traditional Versus Open Offices: A Comparison of Sociotechnical, Social Relations, and Symbolic Meaning Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal. 30(2): 240–259. doi: 10.2307/256272.
A. Brennan, J. S. Chugh, T. Kline. 2002. Traditional versus Open Office Design: A Longitudinal Field Study. Environment and Behavior. 34: 279. doi: 0.1177/0013916502034003001.
Keyvanfar A, Shafaghat A., Abd Majid M. Z., Lamit H. B., Hussin M. W., Binti Ali Kh. N., Dhafer Saad A. 2014. User Satisfaction Adaptive Behaviors for Assessing Energy Efï¬cient Building Indoor Cooling and Lighting Environment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 39: 277–295
A. Maher, C. von Hippel. 2005. Individual Differences in Employee Reactions to Open-plan Offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 25(2): 219–229.
K. L. Jensen, E. Arens, L. Zagreus. 2005. Acoustical Quality in Office Workstation, as Assessed by Occupant Surveys. Proceedings, Indoor Air. 2401–2405.
S. Banbury, D. Berry. 2005. Office Noise and Employee Concentration: Identifying Causes of Disruption and Potential Improvements. Ergonomics. 48(1): 25–37.
P. B. Paulus, R. W. Matthews. 1980. Crowding Attribution and Task Performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1: 3–14.
N. A. Nelson, J. D. Kaufman, J. Burt, C. Karr. 1995. Health Symptoms and the Work Environment in Four Non-problem United States Office Buildings. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 21(1): 51–59.
J. O. Crawford, S. M. Bolas. 1996. Sick Building Syndrome, Work Factors and Occupational Stress. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 22(4): 243–250.
M. Schutte, A. Marks, E. Wenning, B. Griefahn. 2007 The Development of the Noise Sensitivity Questionnaire. Noise and Health. 9(34): 15–24.
T. L. Smith-Jackson, K. W. Klein. 2009. Open-plan Offices: Task Performance and Mental Workload. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 29(2): 279–289.
V. W. Kupritz. Privacy. 1998. In The Work Place: The Impact Of Building Design. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 18(4): 341–356.
A. Kaarlela-Tuomaala, R. Helenius, E. Keskinen, V. Hongisto. 2009. Effects of Acoustic Environment on Work in Private Office Rooms and Open-plan Offices–longitudinal Study During Relocation. Ergonomics. 52(11): 1423-1444. doi: 10.1080/00140130903154579.
E. De Croon, J. Sluiter, P. P. Kuijer, M. Frings-Dresen. 2005. The Effect of Office Concepts on Worker Health and Performance: A Systematic Review of the literature. Ergonomics. 119–134. doi: 10.1080/00140130512331319409.
Y. S. Lee. 2010. Office Layout Affecting Privacy, Interaction, and Acoustic Quality in LEED-certified Buildings. Building and Environment. 45(7): 1594–1600.
J. Pejtersen, L. Allermann, T. S. Kristensen. 2006. Indoor Climate, Psychosocial Work Environment and Symptoms in Open Plan Offices. Indoor Air. 16(5): 392–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00444.x.
C. L. Duval, J. A. Veitch, K. E. Charles. 2002. Open-plan Office Density and Environmental Satisfaction. Institute for Research in Construction, Canada.
I. Balazova, G. Clausen, J. H. Rindel, T. Poulsen, D. P. Wyon. 2008. Open-plan Office Environments: A Laboratory Experiment to Examine the Effect of Office Noise and Temperature on Human Perception, Comfort and Office Work Performance. Indoor Air. 17–22.
M. Navai, V. A. Veitch. 2003. Acoustic Satisfaction in Open-plan Offices: Review and Recommendations. Institute for Research in Construction, Canada. http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ircpubs.
B. P. Haynes. 2008. The Impact of Office Layout on Productivity. Journal of Facilities Management. 6(3): 189–201.
J. H. Pejtersen, H. Feveile, K. B. Christensen, H. Burr. 2011. Sickness Absence Associated with Shared and Open-plan Offices–A National Cross Sectional Questionnaire Survey. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health. 376-382, doi:10.5271/sjweh.3167.
E. De Korte, L. Kuijt-Evers, P. Vink. 2007. Effects of the Office Environment on Health and Productivity 1: Auditory and Visual Distraction. Ergonomics and Health Aspects of Work with Computers. 4566: 26–33.
A. Liebla, J. Haller, B. Jödicke, H. Baumgartner, S. Schlittmeier, Hellbrück J. 2012. Combined Effects of Acoustic and Visual Distraction on Cognitive Performance and Well-being. Applied Ergonomics. 43(2): 424–434.
Ch. Bodin Danielsson, L. Bodin. 2008. Office Type in Relation to Health, Well-Being, and Job Satisfaction Among Employees. Environment and Behavior. 40: 636. doi: 10.1177/0013916507307459.
A. Feige, H. Wallbaum, M. Janser, L. Windlinger. 2013. Impact of Sustainable Ofï¬ce Buildings on Occupant’s Comfort and Productivity. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 15(1): 7–34.
J. C. Vischer. 2008. Towards an Environmental Psychology of Workspace: How People are affected by Environments for Work. Architectural Science Review. 51(2): 97–108.
P. Leather, D. Beale, L. Sullivan. 2003. Noise, Psychosocial Stress and Their Interaction in the Workplace. J. Exp. Psychology. 23: 391–397.
P. Roelofsen. 2008. Performance Loss in Open-plan Ofï¬ces Due to Noise by Speech. Journal of Facilities Management. 6(3): 202–211.
A. A. Red, S. Fisseha, B. Mengistie, J. M. Vandeweerd. 2010. Standard Precautions: Occupational Exposure and Behavior of Health Care Workers in Ethiopia. PLOS One. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014420.
B. L. Cardozo, C. G. Crawford, C. Eriksson, J. Zhu, M. Sabin, A. Ager, D. Foy, L. Snider, W. Scholte, R. Kaiser, M. Olff, B. Rijnen, W. Simon, W. 2012. Psychological Distress, Depression, Anxiety, and Burnout among International Humanitarian Aid Workers: A Longitudinal Study. PLOS One. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044948.
H. Lamit, A. Shafaghat, M. Z. Abd. Majid, A. Keyvanfar, Mohd Hamdan Bin Ahmad, and T. A. Malik. 2013. GROUNDED GROUP DECISION MAKING (GGDM) MODEL. Journal of Advanced Science Letters. 19(10): 3077–3080.
Y. H. Lee, Ch.S Tan., Sh. Mohammad, M. M. D. Tahir, P.N. Shek. 2014. Review on Cold-Formed Steel Connections. The Scientiï¬c World Journal. 11–19.
E. Talebi; M. M. D. Tahir, F. Zahmatkesh, A. Yasreen, J. Mirza. 2014. Thermal Behavior of Cylindrical Buckling Restrained Braces at Elevated Temperatures. The Scientific World Journal. 
A. B. H. Kueh, W.W. She, P. N. Shek, C. S. Tan, M. M. Tahir. 2011. Maximum Local Thermal Effects Carpet Plot for Symmetric Laminated Composite Plates. Advanced Materials Research.  250–253: 3748–3751.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
