Effect of Velocity Variation at High Swirl on Axial Flow Development inside a Can Combustor

Authors

  • Mohamad Shaiful Ashrul Ishak School of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, P.O Box 77, Pejabat Pos Besar, 01000 Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Nazri Mohd. Jaafar Department of Aeronautics, Automotive & Ocean Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v71.3716

Keywords:

Swirler, swirl number, combustor, turbulence, CFD simulation

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to study the internal flow effect of varying the inlet velocities inside a combustor. The flow field inside the combustor is controlled by the liner shape and size, wall side holes shape, size and arrangement (primary, secondary and dilution holes), and primary air swirler configuration. Air swirler adds sufficient swirling to the inlet flow to generate central recirculation region (CRZ) which is necessary for flame stability and fuel air mixing enhancement. Therefore, designing an appropriate air swirler is a challenge to produce stable, efficient and low emission combustion with low pressure losses. Four various injection velocities from 30m/s to 60m/s with radial vanes angle of 50 degree were used in this analysis to show velocity effect on the internal flow field. The flow behavior was investigated numerically using CFD solver Ansys 14.0. This study has provided the characteristic insight into the flow pattern inside the combustion chamber. Results show that the swirling action is augmented with the increase in the injection velocity, which leads to increase in core reverse flow, thus enhancing mixing of fuel and air in the combustion chamber.

References

D.L. Mathur. 1974. A New Design of Vanes for Swirl Generation. IE (I) Journal ME. 55: 93–96.

N. Fricker and W. Leuckel. 1976. The Characteristic of Swirl Stabilized Natural Gas Flame Part 3: The Effect of Swirl and Burner Mouth Geometry on Flame Stability. J. Inst. Fuel. 49: 152–158.

A. Mestre and A. Benoit. 1973. Combustion in Swirling Flow. Proc. 14th Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute. Pittsburgh. 719.

A. Chervinskey and Y. Manheimertiment. 1968. Effect of Swirl on Flame Stabilization. Israel Journal of Technology. 6(2): 25–31.

K. H. Khalil, F. M. El-Mehallawy and H. A. Moneib. 1977. Effect of Combustion Air Swirl on the Flow Pattern in a Cylindrical Oil Fired Furnace, Proc. 16th Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh. 135–143.

G. Apack. 1974. Interaction of Gaseous Multiple Swirling Flames, Phd thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering and Fuel Technology, University of Sheffield.

A.K. Gupta, D.G. Lilley and N. Syred. 1984. Swirl Flows. Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, England.

R.H. Chen and J.F. Driscoll. 1988. The Role of the Recirculation Vortex in Improving Fuel-air Mixing within Swirling Flames. Proc. 22nd Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh. 531–54.

H.S. Al-Kabie. 1989. Radial Swirlers for Low Emissions Gas Turbine Combustion. University of Leeds, Dept. of Fuel & Energy: PhD Theses.

J. M. Beer and N. A. Chigier. 1972. Combustion Aerodynamics. Applied Science Publisher, London.

FLUENT 14.0 2012. User's Guide. Fluent Inc.

Y.M. Kim, and T.J. Chung. 1989. Finite- Element Analysis of Turbulent Diffusion Flames. AIAA J. 27(3): 330–339.

K.R. Menzies. 2005. An Evolution of Turbulence Models for the Isothermal Flow in a Gas Turbine Combustion System. Proc. 6th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments, Sardinia, Italy.

J.L. Da Palma. 1988. Mixing in Non-Reacting Gas Turbine Combustor Flows. PhD Thesis, University of London.

F. Durst and D. Wennerberg. 1981. Numerical Aspects of Calculation of Confined Swirling Flows with Internal Recirculation. Int. J. Numerical Methods Fluids. 12: 203–224.

W. Zhou, D. Moyeda, R. Payne and M. Berg. 2009. Application of numerical simulation and full scale testing for modelling low NOx burner emissions. Combustion Theory and Modelling. 13(6: 1053–1070.

H.K. Versteeg and W. Malalasakera. 1995. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, the Finite Volume Method. Longman Group Ltd.

M.N. Mohd Jaafar, Y.A. Eldrainy and M.F. Ahmad. 2009. Investigation of Radial Swirler Effect on Flow Pattern inside Gas Turbine Combustor. Modern Applied. Science 3(5): 21-30.

A.E. Yehia, S.A. Hossam M.S. Khalid and M.N. Mohd Jaafar. 2010. A Multiple. Inlet Swirler for Gas Turbine Combustors, Int. J. Mechanical Syst. Sci. Eng. 2(2): 106–109.

M. N. Mohd Jaafar, M.S.A. Ishak and S. Saharin. 2010. Removal of NOx and CO from a Burner System. Environmental Science and Technology. 44 (8): 3111–3115

Downloads

Published

2014-11-27

How to Cite

Effect of Velocity Variation at High Swirl on Axial Flow Development inside a Can Combustor. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 71(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v71.3716