Effect of Varying the Retainer Angle on the Performance of Oil Burner

Authors

  • Arizal, M. A. A. Department of Aeronautics & Automotive, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Jaafar, M. N. M. Department of Aeronautics & Automotive, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.3921

Keywords:

Retainer, gas emission, oil burner, combustor, diesel, swirl

Abstract

A research has been done to observe the effect of varying the retainer angle on the performance of oil burner in terms of exhaust gas emissions and temperatures. Retainer was a flame stabilizer used to stabilize the flame, improve mixing between air and fuel and affect the formation of emissions such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). These emissions can cause harm to the world ecosystem. One of the methods to reduce emissions was by varying the retainer's blade angle to certain angle that complete the combustion with high efficiencies and less emissions. In this research, an oil burner with four different retainer angles has been investigated using a combustor of one meter length. Tests were conducted using diesel as feedstock. Four different retainer angles used are 15°, 30° (baseline), 45°, and 60° with swirl number 0.2016, 0.4344, 0.7524, and 1.3032. From the experiment, data shown that swirling flow affect the formation of recirculation zone thus provides the aerodynamics blockage to stabilize the flame and emissions reduced due to varying the retainer angles and the best retainer angle was achieved by consider the exhaust gas emission reduction.

References

Lefebvre, Arthur, H. 2010. Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels and Emissions. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

Burkhardt, C. H. 1969. Domestic and Commercial Oil Burners: Installation and Servicing. McGraw-Hill.

World Health Organization. 2000. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, second Edition. WHO Regional Publications, European Series No. 91, WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, 2000.

Mohammad Nazri Mohd Jaafar. 1997. Emission from Gas Burner, Their impact on the Environmnet and Abatement Techniques: A Review. Mekanikal Journal.

Lefebvre, A. H. 1998. Gas Turbine Combustion. CRC Press.

Arthur W. Judge. 1950. Modern Gas Turbines. 2nd Edition. London: Chapman and Hall.

A.M. Mellor. 1990. Design of Modern Turbine Combustors. Vanderbit University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Beer, J. M. and Chigier N. A. 1972. Combustion Aerodynamics. Applied Science Publishers Ltd.

Ishak, M. S. A., Jaafar, M. N. M. 2014. Effect of Swirl Strength to Axial Flow Development Inside the Can Combustor. International Review of Mechanical Engineering. 8(1), 241–250.

Eldrainy, Y. A., Jaafar, M. N. M., Lazim, T. M. 2011. Cold Flow Investigation of Primary Zone Characteristics in Combustor Utilizing Axial Air Swirler. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 74: 977–983.

Meherwan, P. Boyce. 1982. Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook. Gulf Publishing Company.

C. R. Simmons. 1968. Gas Turbine Manual. 3rd Edition. Temple Press Books.

DOE. 2006. Malaysia Environmental Quality Report. Department of Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Malaysia.

Jaafar, M. N. M., Ishak, M. S. A., Saharin, S. 2010. Removal of NOx and CO from a Burner System. Environmental Science and Technology. 44 (8). 3111–3115.

V. Ganesan. 2003. Internal Combustion Engines. Tata McGraw Hill Company.

Eldrainy, Y. A., R. J. J. M., Jaafar, M. N. M. 2008. Prediction of the Flow Inside A Micro Gas Turbine Combustor. Jurnal Mekanikal. 25: 50–63.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-08

How to Cite

Effect of Varying the Retainer Angle on the Performance of Oil Burner. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 72(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.3921