Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Measure the Learning Management System Acceptance by Students of Politeknik Sakti Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.3927Keywords:
Student’s acceptance, technology acceptance model, learning management systemAbstract
The purpose of this study is to measure factors that influence students’acceptance of a Learning Management System (LMS) using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). LMS is an information system that facilitates e-learning that serves to process, store, disseminate learning materials and provides administrative support and communication related to the teaching and learning process. Support students as users of the LMS content are one of the success factors in the implementation of the LMS. This study uses the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which has five factors namely perceived usefullness, perceived ease of use, attitudes towards to use, behavioral intention to use and actual use. A set of questionnaires have been completed by 60 students in Politeknik SAKTI Surabaya. Data were processed using SmartPLS and analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) method. The results showed that the TAM was valid, reliable, and substantially acceptable based on the results of data evaluation, ie the indicator factor loading > 0.5, the t-statistic ≥ 1.96, the cronbach alpha ≥ 0.6, and the value of the goodness of fit  = 0.47. The factors that influence students’acceptance of a LMS in Politeknik SAKTI Surabaya are perceived usefullness, perceived ease of use, and attitudes towards to use, affecting the intention to use, and significantly affect the actual use of LMS.References
McGill, T. J. & Klobas, J. E. 2008. A Task-Technology Fit View of Learning Management System Impact. Journal of Computer & Education. Elseiver. 52: 496–508
Suhartanto, H. 2009. Survei 2009: Mutu Situs E-Learning Sekolah Indonesia Masih Sangat Minim. Jurnal Sistem Informasi MTI-UI. 6(1): 80–83. ISSN 1412-8896.
Selim, H. M. 2007. Critical Success Factors for E-Learning Acceptance: Confrmatory Factor Models. Computers & Education. 49: 396–413.
Shah, G. U. D., Bhatti, M. N., Iftikhar, M., Qureshi, M. I., & Zaman, K. 2013. Implementation of Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning Environment in Rural and Urban areas of Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal. 27(11): 1495–1507.
Sanchez, R. A. & Hueros, A. D. 2010. Motivational Factors That Influence The Acceptance of Moodle Using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior. 26: 1632–1640
Graf, S., & List, B. 2005, July. An Evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing Adaptation Issues. In ICALT. 5: 163–165.
Raaij, E. M. V & Schepers, J. J. L 2006. The acceptance and Use of AVirtual Learning Environmentin in China. Computer & Education. 50: 838–852. Elseiver.
Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion Into the Technologyacceptance Model. Information Systems Research. 11: 342–3.
Rasli, A. 2006. Data Analysis and Beyond: A Practical Guide for Post-Graduate Social Scientists. Skudai, Malaysia: Penerbit UTM.
Yamin,S. & Kurniawan, H. 2011. Generasi Baru Mengolah Data Penelitian dengan Partial Least Square Path Modeling. Aplikasi dengan Software XLSTAT, SmartPLS, dan Visual PLS. Buku Aplikasi Statistik Seri 4, Salemba Infotek. ISBN 978-602-8126-16-8.
Vinzi, VE.,Chin, WW., Henseler J., Wang H. 2010. Handbook of Partial Least Square: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer.
Md Athar Imtiaz & Nurazean Maarop. 2014. A Review of Technology Acceptance Studies in the Field of Education. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering). 69(2): 27–32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
