ASSESSMENT OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY LEVEL AND SICK BUILDING SYNDROME ACCORDING TO THE AGES OF BUILDING IN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Norhidayah Ahmad Institute of Hydrogen Economy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mimi Haryani Hassim Institute of Hydrogen Economy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.3995

Keywords:

Indoor air quality, new building, old building, sick building syndrome, workplace assessment

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the indoor air quality (IAQ) level of buildings in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). The buildings were randomly selected and represent the old building (>10years) and new building (<10 years). The IAQ physical parameters assessed are temperature, relative humidity and air velocity. Meanwhile, the IAQ chemical contaminants studied are carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde (HCHO) and total volatile organic compound (TVOC). The results indicate that the old building has good IAQ level compared to the new buildings. The statistical test shows, there is an association between some IAQ physical parameters and the buildings’ ages (p<0.05). On the chemical contaminants, the measurement shows that the concentration of CO2 and HCHO for all studied buildings exceeds the Malaysian acceptable exposure limits. The results also show there is no association between demographic factors and sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms. The level of workplace condition and SBS symptoms existed in each selected faculty’s buildings was also analyzed. The recommendations for the minimum number of years for maintenance of the indoor conditions have also been suggested based on the indoor air quality guidelines from Malaysia and Singapore. Finally, the appropriate technical and management approach has been suggested based on the some concepts.

References

Abdel Hameed, A. A. 2000. Indoor and Outdoor Formaldehyde Concentrations in Homes in Residential Areas in Greater Cairo. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2(2): 123-126.

Arundel, A. V., Sterling, E. M., Biggin, J. H., and Sterling, T. D. 1986. Indirect Health Effects of Relative Humidity in Indoor Environments. Environmental Health Perspectives. 65: 351.

Daisey, J. M., Angell, W. J. and Apte, M. G. 2003. Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation and Health Symptoms in Schools: An Analysis of Existing Information. Indoor Air. 13, 53-64.

Fromme, H., Twardella, D., Dietrich, S., Heitmann. D., Schierl. R., Liebl. B. and Ruden, H. 2007. Particulate Matter in the Indoor Air of Classrooms – Exploratory Results from Munich and Surrounding Area. Atmospheric Environment. 41: 854-856.

Jalaludin, J., Nordiyana, M. S., and Suhaimi, N. F. 2014. Exposure to Indoor Air Pollutants (Formaldehyde, VOCs, Ultrafine Particles) and Respiratory Health Symptoms among Office Workers in Old and New Buildings in Universiti Putra Malaysia. International Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences. 3(1): 69-80.

Jones, A. P. 1999. Indoor Air Quality and Health. Atmospheric Environment. 33(28): 4535-4564.

Lee, S. C. and Chang, M. 2000. Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality Investigation at Schools in Hong Kong. Chemosphere. 41: 109-113.

Levin, H. Practical Ways Building Designers Address Indoor Air Quality Issues?

Montgomery, D. D., and Kalman, D. A. 1989. Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality: Reference Concentrations in Complaint Free Residences. Application Industrial Hygiene. 4: 17-20.

Malaysia. 2005. Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality. GP (1)05/2005.

Malaysia. 2010. Industry Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality 2010. JKKP DP(S) 127/379/4-39.

Malaysia. 2008. Guideline for Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control (HIRARC). JKKP DP 127/789/4-47.

Prill, R. 2000. Why Measure Carbon Dioxide Inside Buildings? Washington State University Extension Energy Program.

Rosli, N. F. and Jalaluddin, J. 2012. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) among Office Workers in New and Old Building in Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang. Health and the Environmental Journal. 3(2): 98-109.

Saraga, D., Pateraki, S., Papadopoulus, A., Vasilakos, C., and Maggos. 2011. Studying the Indoor Air Quality in Three Non-Residential Environments of Different Use: A Museum, a Printer Industry and an Office. Building and Environment. 46: 2333-2341.

Shaughnessy, R. J., Shaughnessy, U. H., Nevalainen, A., and Moschandreas, D. 2006. A Preliminary Study on the Association between Ventilation Rates in Classrooms and Student Performance. Indoor Air. 16: 465-468.

Singapore. 1996. Guidelines for Good Indoor Air Quality in Office Premises.

Sulaiman, Z., and Mohamed, M. 2011. Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome Study at Two Selected Libraries in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Environment Asia. 4(1): 67-74.

US-EPA-Indoor Air Quality (2013) [Online]. From: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/. [Accessed on 18th March 2013].

Downloads

Published

2015-08-26

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

ASSESSMENT OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY LEVEL AND SICK BUILDING SYNDROME ACCORDING TO THE AGES OF BUILDING IN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 76(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.3995