A Simplified Method for Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Building in Kundasang, Sabah, Malaysia

Authors

  • M. Ghafar Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • N. Ramly Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • M. Alel Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Azlan Adnan Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Edy Tonnizam Mohamad Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • M.Z.M. Yunus Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.4003

Keywords:

Vulnerability assessment, Rapid Visual Screening, GIS.

Abstract

A simplified method for preliminary seismic vulnerability assessment of existing building in particular area of Kundasang, Sabah Malaysia region is proposed. The surveys are mainly focused on building inventory such as identifying the building occupancy, building type and the storey number of buildings for study area. Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) can be effectively used to evaluate the vulnerability of large number of buildings for study area with less computational effort. The data collection form of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 154) for RVS was gathered for this purpose. The objective of this study is to assess the vulnerable building that tendency to be further detailed analysis by the calculation of score in RVS method. Pre-assessment towards seismic vulnerability of every individual building in particular area has been assessed and the information of buildings in study region consist residential, industrial, government, school building occupancies were recorded and spatially analyzed using Geographical Information System (GIS) framework. Buildings in Kundasang are considered as less further evaluation (34%) which need have detailed analysis by modeling the structure, while another 66% considered as safe building based on rapid visual final score.

References

Bendick, R., Bilham, Fielding, R.E., Gaur, V., Hough, S.E., Kier, G., Kulkarni, M.,Martin, S. and Mukul, M. 2001. The January 26. Bhuj India earthquake. Seismological Research Letter. 73(3).

Adnan, A.,Hendriyawan, A. Marto,and I.Masyhur. 2005. Seismic Hazard Assessment for Peninsular Malaysia using Gumbel Distribution Method. Jurnal Teknologi. 42: 55–73

Sherliza ZAINI SOORIA, Sumio SAWADA and Hiroyuki GOTO. 2012. Proposal for Seismic Resistant Design In Malaysia: Assessment of Possible Ground Motions in Peninsular Malaysia. Annual of Disas.Res. Ins. No. 55B. Kyoto University

Taksiah Abdul Majid. 2009. Less Than One Percent Of Building Malaysia Have Earthquake Preventive Measure. http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v5/newsindex.

Steven M. Vukazich, Guna Selvaduray, Jessica Tran. Conducting a Soft First-Storey Multi Family Dwelling survey. An Example using Santa Clara County, California

Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I., and Wisner B. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, Disaster. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.

Dowrick D.J. 2003. Earthquake Risk Reduction. UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Sucuoglu, H, And Yazgan, U. 2003. Simple Procedure for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Buildings Stocs. Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildins. NATO Science Series. IV/29: 97–118. Editors: S.T. Wasti and G. Ozcebe, Kluwer

Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J.J Restrepo-Velev and Crowley, H. 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology

Guragain, J. 2004. GIS for Seismic Building Loss Estimation: A Case Study from Lalitpur Sub-Metropolitan City Area, Katmandu, Nepal.84. M. Sc. Thesis. Enschede.

FEMA 154. 2002. Rapid Visual Scrrening of Building for Potential Seismic Hazards. A Handbook, 2nd edn. Redwood City, CA.

Sinha R., and Goyal A. 2004. A National Policy for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings and Procedure for Rapid Visual Screening of Building for Potential Seismic Vulnerability. Proposed National Policy on Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings, Mumbai, India.

FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2012. HAZUS-MH 2.1: Technical Manual. Washington DC: FEMA.

Ghafar, N., Ramly, M., Alel and A., Adnan. 2013. Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Kundasang, Sabah, Malaysia. 9th International Conference on Geotechnical and Transportation Engineering. Persada Johor International Convention Center, Johor Bharu, Malaysia.

ATC. 2002. Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards. Supporting Documentation (2nd edition), prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 155bReport, Washington, D.C.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-25

How to Cite

A Simplified Method for Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Building in Kundasang, Sabah, Malaysia. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 72(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.4003