THE EFFECT OF COMPONENT THICKNESS ON THE FLATTENING OF SURFACE ASPERITIES

Authors

  • J. Jamari Laboratory for Engineering Design and Tribology, University of Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Dirk Jan Schipper Laboratory for Surface Technology and Tribology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.4141

Keywords:

Contact mechanics, indentation, thickness, deformation, asperity

Abstract

An experimental investigation of a deformable flat rough surface being in contact with a hard smooth ball indenter was presented to evaluate the effect of thickness on the flattening of surface asperities. A novel method to determine the asperities flattening was deployed. The method uses a matching and stitching technique for analyzing the 3D measurement surface data. Two different materials of flat surfaces, aluminium and brass, were used. Results were presented for very thin and thick specimens, showing that there is no effect of thickness on the deformation degree of the surface asperities. Comparisons were made with the published models for predicting the deformation degree of the contacting surface and the results obtained confirm very well the model.    

Author Biography

  • J. Jamari, Laboratory for Engineering Design and Tribology, University of Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
      

References

Moore, A. J. W. 1948. Deformation of Metals in Static and in Sliding Contact. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A195: 231-249.

Williamson, J. B. P., and Hunt, R. T. 1972. Asperity Persistence and the Real Area of Contact between Rough Surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A327: 147-157.

Pullen, J., and Williamson, J. B. P. 1972. On the Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A327: 159-173.

Childs, T. H. C. 1973. The Persistence of Asperities in Indentation Experiments. Wear. 25: 3-16.

Wanheim, T. 1973. Friction at High Normal Pressure. Wear. 25: 225-244.

Chivers, T. C., Mitchell, L. A., and Rowe, M. D. 1974. The Variation of Real Contact Area between Surfaces with Contact Pressure and Material Hardness. Wear. 28: 171-185.

Wilson, W. R. D., and Sheu, S. 1988. Real Area of Contact and Boundary Friction in Metal Forming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 30: 475-489.

Sutcliffe, M. P. F. 1988. Surface Asperity Deformation in Metal Forming Processes. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 30: 847-868.

Makinouchi, A., Ike, H., Murakawa, M., and Koga, N. 1988. A Finite Element Analysis of Flattening of Surface Asperities by Perfectly Lubricated Rigid Dies in Metal Working Processes. Wear. 128: 109-122.

Ike, H., and Makinouchi, A. 1990. Effect of Lateral Tension and Compression on Plane Strain Flattening Processes of Surface Asperities Lying over a Plastically Deformable Bulk. Wear. 140: 17-38.

Korzekwa, D. A., Dawson, P. R., and Wilson, W. R. D. 1992. Surface Asperity Deformation during Sheet Metal Forming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 34: 521-539.

Sutcliffe, M. P. F. 1999. Flattening of Random Rough Surfaces in Metal-forming Processes. ASME Journal of Tribology. 121: 433-440.

Lee-Prudhoe, I., Sayles, R. S., and Kaderic, A. 1999. Investigations into Asperity Persistence in Heavily Loaded Contacts. ASME Journal of Tribology. 121: 441-448.

Jamari, J., and Schipper, D. J. 2007. Criterion for Surface Contact Deformation of Metals. Tribo Test. 13: 1-11.

Jamari, J., and Schipper, D. J. 2007. Plastic Deformation and Contact Area of an Elastic-Plastic Contact of Ellipsoid Bodies after Unloading. Tribology International. 40: 1311-1318.

Jamari, J., and Schipper, D. J. 2008. Deterministic Repeated Contact of Rough Surfaces. Wear. 264: 349-358.

Milner, D. R., and Rowe, G. W. 1962. Fundamentals of Solid-phase Welding. Metallurgical Reviews. 7: 433-480.

Greenwood, J. A., and Rowe, G. W. 1965. Deformation of Surface Asperities during Bulk Plastic Flow. Journal of Applied Physics. 36: 667-668.

Schroeder, A., Webster, D. A., and Burbank, C. 1949. Press-forging Thin Sections: Effect of Friction, Area, and Thickness on Pressure Required. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics. 16: 289-294.

Kimura, Y., and Childs, T. H. C. 1999. Surface Asperity Deformation under Bulk Plastic Straining Conditions. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 41: 283-307.

Ismail, R., Saputra, E., Tauviqirrahman, M., Jamari, J., and Schipper, D. J. 2014. Modeling of Repeated Rolling Contact on Rough Surface: Surface Topograhical Change. Advanced Materials Research. 896: 642-645.

de Rooij, M. B., and Schipper, D. J. 1998. A Wear Measurement Method Based on the Comparison of Local Surface Heights. Wear. 217: 182-189.

Sloetjes, J. W., Schipper, D. J., Lugt, P. M., and Tripp, J. H. 2000. The Determination of Changes in Surface Topography Using Image Processing Techniques. Proceeding of the International Tribology Conference, Nagasaki. 241-246.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-21

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

THE EFFECT OF COMPONENT THICKNESS ON THE FLATTENING OF SURFACE ASPERITIES. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.4141