FLOOD RISK PATTERN RECOGNITION BY USING ENVIRONMETRIC TECHNIQUE: A CASE STUDY IN LANGAT RIVER BASIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.4142Keywords:
Hydrological, climate change, flood risk, time series analysis, Factor analysisAbstract
This study looks into the downscaling of statistical model to produce and predict hydrological modelling in the study area based on secondary data derived from the Department of Drainage and Irrigation (DID) since 1982-2012. The combination of chemometric method and time series analysis in this study showed that the monsoon season and rainfall did not affect the water level, but the suspended solid, stream flow and water level that revealed high correlation in correlation test with p-value < 0.0001, which affected the water level. The Factor analysis for the variables of the stream flow, suspended solid and water level showed strong factor pattern with coefficient more than 0.7, and 0.987, 1.000 and 1.000, respectively. Based on the Statistical Process Control (SPC), the Upper Control Limit for water level, suspended solid and stream flow were 21.110 m3/s, 4624.553 tonnes/day, and 8.224 m/s, while the Lower Control Limit were 20.711 m, 2538.92 tonnes/day and 2.040 m/s. This shows that human development in the area gives high impact towards climate change and flood risk, and not the monsoon season. Prediction was carried out using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to classify risks into their own classes, and the rate of accuracy for the prediction was 97.1%. This meant that the points in the time series analysis which were located beyond Upper Control Limit were considered as High Risk class, and the probability for flood occurrence is very high. The other classes classified in this prediction are Caution Zone, Low Risk and No risk. This is important to set a trigger for warning system in the case of emergency response plan during flood.
Â
References
Aiken, R. S., Leigh, C. H., Leinbach, T. R., & Moss, M. R. 1982. Development and Environment in Peninsular Malaysia. Singapore. McGraw-Hill International Book Company.
Juahir, H., Sharifuddin, M. Z., Ahmad, Z. A, Mohd, K. Y., Mazlin, M. 2009. Spatial Assessment of Langat River Water Quality Using Chemometrics. Journal of Environmental Monitoring.12: 287-295.
Toriman, M. E., Md. Pauzi Abdullah, Mazlin Bin Mokhtar, Muhamad Barzani Gasim, Othman Karim. 2010. Surface Erosion and Sediment Yields Assessment from Small Ungauged Catchment of Sungai Anak Bangi, Selangor. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences.14 (1): 12-23.
Toriman, M. E., Joy Jacqueline Pereira, Muhamad Barzani Gasim, Sharifah Mastura, S. A., and Nor Azlina Abdul Aziz. 2009. Issues of Climate Change and Water Resources in Peninsular Malaysia: The Case of Northern Kedah. The Arab World Geographer. 12(1-2): 87-94.
Toriman, M. E. 2008. Developing a Conceptual Model of Geomorphic Change for Channel Management Proposes. A case of Langat River Basin. Journal e-BANGI. 3(3): 1-12.
Toriman, M. E., Zulkifli Yusop, Mazlin Mokhtar & Hafizan Juahir. 2006. Application of GIS for Detecting Changes of Sungai Langat channel. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering. 18(1): 58-70.
Mazlin, M., Mohd Ekhwan Toriman & Md. Abdullah Abraham Hossain. 2010. Social Learning in Facing Challenges of Sustainable Development: A Case of Langat River Basin, Malaysia. Research Journal of Applied Sciences. 5(6): 434-443
Gasim, M. B., Mazen, M. Jamil, Sahibin, A. Rahim & M. E. Toriman. 2009. Water-Quality Assessment o the Langat River at Kilometre 7, Jalan Kajang-Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. The Arab World Geographer. 12(3-4): 188-196.
Pielke, R., G. Dalu, J. Snook, T. Lee, and T. Kittel. 1991. Nonlinear Influence of Mesoscale Land-Use on Weather And Climate. J.Climate. 4: 1053-1069.
Moore, D. S., & McCabe, G. P. 1989. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co. Altman, D .G. 1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, London. 285-288.
Imrie, C. E., Durucan, S. and Korea, A. 2000. River Flow Prediction by Using Artificial Neural Networks: Generalisation Beyond Calibration Range. J.Hydrol. 233: 138-153.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. 1995. Factor Analysis in the Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments. Psychological Assessment. 7(3): 286-299.
Gorsuch, R. L. 1990. Common Factor-Analysis Versus Component Analysis-Some Well and Little Known Facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 25(1): 33-39.
Thompson, B., Daniel, L. G. 1996. Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some Guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 56(2): 197-208.
Brett William, Ted Brown, and Andry Onsman. 2012. Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Five-Step Guide for Novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 8(3).
Jackson, J. E. 1991. A User's Guide to Principal Components. Wiley, New York.
Sarbu, C., and Pop, H. F., 2005. Principal Component Analysis Versus Fuzzy Principal Component Analysis A Case Study: The Quality Of Danube Water (1985–1996). Journal of Talanta. 65: 1215-1220.
Raman H., and Sunilkumar, N. 1995. Multivariate Modeling of Water Resources Time Series Using Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Hydrological Sciences. 40: 145-163.
Yegnanarayana. 1994. Artificial Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Journal of Scidhanci. 19: 189-238.
Igor Trubin. 2008. Exception Based Modeling and Forecasting. Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.