Motivations for Value Co-creation in Higher Education Institutions Using Online Platforms: Case of Idea Bank

Authors

  • Nabil Hasan Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Azizah Abdul Rahman Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Faisal Saeed Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4194

Keywords:

Value co-creation in HEIs, online platforms, stakeholder involvement

Abstract

The involvement of stakeholders in value creation is one of the successful marketing techniques. It helps to introduce a very clear view of understanding the stakeholder’s needs, thought and suggestions. Stakeholder engagement in value creation will highlight the fact that new ideas for developing services or products will help to meet customer’s needs and expectations. Ideation is one of the most important strategies that lead to development of such services, enhancing service quality and innovation. Motivation for generating ideas from stakeholders in Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) through online interaction platforms is one of the challenges that needs further exploration, because of  human differences in the nature of motivation and mindset. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) idea bank online platform is adopted as a case study in this research paper. The main aim of this study is to identify the factors that encourage stakeholders in HEIs to be continuously involved in value co-creation through available online platforms. Interviews with sample of active stakeholders have been conducted using open end questions. In addition, observation on idea bank website and analyzing the archive and website history is considered. The initial results identify three areas of motivations for value co-creation in HEIs: organizational motives, online platform characteristics, individual motives. Results and implications for this case study will help HEIs such as universities achieve better global market positioning, to differentiate themselves among others, and to develop stakeholder’s competencies.  

References

Jana Lay- Hwa. B. 2011. Co-creating Value in Higher Education: The Role of Interactive Classroom Response Technologies. Asian Social Science. 7: 11.

Carvalho & Mota. 2010. The Role of Trustin Creating Value and Student Loyalty in Relational Exchanges Between Higher Education Institutions and Their Students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 20(1): 145–165. DOI:10.1080/08841241003788201.

Adeleke, E. 2013. Value Co-creation in Malaysian Public Service. PhD Thesis. UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, Ph.D. Thesis.

Golooba, M. 2013. Service Value Co-Creation in Research & Innovation Practices in Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia

Sigala. 2013. Web 0.2 and Customer Involvement in Co-creation. Book, Chapter3. 35.

Lidija. 2013. Enhancing Knowledge in Web 2.0 Platforms: Applying a CoI Framework. Modul University, Austria.

UTM Idea Bank Website

Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., and Akaka, M. A. 2008. On Value and Value Co-Creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective. European Management Journal. 26: 145–152.

Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. 2004. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing. 68: 1–17.

Vargo, L. S. and Lusch, R. F. 2008. Service-dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of Academy Marketing Science. 36: 1–10.

Maria, T., Dimitris, P., & Garyfallos, F. 2014. Value Co-Creation and University Teaching Services. The Case of Teachers' Evaluation Process. 3(2).

Vargo, S. L. 2007. On A Theory of Markets and Marketing: From Positively Normative to Normatively Positive. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 15(1): 53–60.

Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. 2008. From Goods to Service(S): Divergences and Convergences of Logics. Industrial Marketing Management. 37(3): 254–259.

Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. 2008. Service-dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 36(1): 1–10.

Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., &Gurevitch, M. 1974. Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual. In: The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 19–32.

Hofste. 2013. What are the Motivations for (European) Customers to Participate in Online Co-Creation? University of Twente.

Gibbs, G. R. 2010. Coding Part 1: Alan Bryman's 4 Stages of Qualitative Analysis. [Web Video]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X7VuQxPfpk&feature=list_other&playnext=1&list=SP14E49EDF20613008.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-09

How to Cite

Motivations for Value Co-creation in Higher Education Institutions Using Online Platforms: Case of Idea Bank. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 73(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4194