Permeate Flux Measurement and Prediction of Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Filtration Process Using Intelligent Techniques

Authors

  • Zakariah Yusuf Control and Mechatronic Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baharu, Johor Malaysia
  • Norhaliza Abdul Wahab Control and Mechatronic Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baharu, Johor Malaysia
  • Shafishuhaza Sahlan Control and Mechatronic Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baharu, Johor Malaysia
  • Abdul Halim Abdul Raof Language Acadeny, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Baharu, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4251

Keywords:

Membrane filtration process, soft sensor, FFNN, RBFNN

Abstract

Recently, membrane technology has become more attractive particularly in solid-liquid separation process. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) has found to be a reliable technology to replace the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process for water and wastewater treatment by adopting membrane filtration technology and bioreactor. However, numerous drawbacks arise when using membrane which includes high maintenance cost and fouling problem. An optimal MBR plant operation is needed to be determined in order to reduce fouling and at the same time reduce the cost of running the MBR. It is crucial to have a reliable MBR filtration prediction that can measure and predict the filtration dynamic performance especially the effect of fouling to the filtration and cleaning operations. With this prediction tool, suitable action can be taken to improve the operation in order to find the optimum setting of the filtration process. This paper presents the permeate flux measurement and prediction development for submerged membrane filtration process. Three input filtration parameters were used to predict the permeate flux in the filtration process. This work  employed feed forward artificial neural network (FFNN) and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) for the prediction purpose. The permeate flux prediction method was developed using operation settings such as aeration airflow, suction pump voltage and transmembrane pressure (TMP) under schedule relaxation condition.  The result shows that FFNN method gives better performance compared with RBFNN method in terms of accuracy and reliability. 

References

Q. Liu and S. Kim. 2008. Evaluation of Membrane Fouling Models Based On Bench-scale Experiments: A Comparison Between Constant Flowrate Blocking Laws And Artificial Neural Network ( ANNs ) Model. J. Memb. Sci. 310: 393–401.

M. Kim, B. Sankararao, S. Lee, and C. Yoo. 2013. Prediction and Identifi cation of Membrane Fouling Mechanism in a Membrane Bioreactor Using a Combined Mechanistic Model. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52: 17198–17205.

G. R. Shetty and S. Chellam. 2003. Predicting Membrane Fouling During Municipal Drinking Water Nanofiltration Using Artificial Neural Networks. Memb. Sci. 217: 69–86.

S. Judd. 2010. The MBR Book Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Second Edi.: Elsevier.

P. Le-clech, V. Chen, and T. A. G. Fane. 2006. Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors Used in Wastewater Treatment. J. Memb. Sci. 284: 17–53.

A. Drews. 2010. Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors—Characterisation, Contradictions, Cause and Cures. 363: 1–28.

E. Akhondi, F. Wicaksana, and A. Gordon. 2014. Evaluation of Fouling Deposition, Fouling Reversibility and Energy Consumption of Submerged Hollow Fiber Membrane Systems with Periodic Backwash. J. Memb. Sci. 452: 319–331.

S. Judd. 2005. Fouling Control in Submerged Membrane Bioreactors. Water Sci. Technol. 51: 27–34.

T. Zsirai, P. Buzatu, P. Aerts, and S. Judd. 2012. Efficacy of Relaxation, Backflushing, Chemical Cleaning and Clogging Removal for an Immersed Hollow Fibre Membrane Bioreactor. Water Res. 46: 4499–4507.

X. Lei. 2010. Simulation and Mechanisms of Aeration Impacts on the Permeate Flux in Submerged Membrane Systems. Desalin. Water Treat. 18: 277–285.

S. Geilvoet, A. Moreau, E. Atasoy, P. Krzeminski, A. Van Nieuwenhuijzen, and J. Van Der Graaf. 2010. MLSS Concentration: Still a Poorly Understood Parameter in MBR Filterability. Desalination. 250: 618–622.

E. T. Baars, S. G. J. Heijman, and T. G. J. Bosklopper. 2005. Red Alert on Transmembrane Pressure (TMP). Desalination. 179: 125–130.

S. Geissler, T. Wintgens, T. Melin, and K. Vossenkaul. 2005. Modelling Approaches for Filtration Processes with Novel Submerged Capillary Modules in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. 178: 15–17.

A. Aidan, N. Abdel-Jabbar, T. H. Ibrahim, V. Nenov, and F. Mjalli.2007. Neural Network Modeling and Optimization of Scheduling Backwash for Membrane Bioreactor. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 10: 389–395.

H. Hasar and C. Kinaci. 2006. Modeling of Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Treating Cheese Whey Wastewater by Artificial Neural Network. 123: 204–209.

L. Erdei, S. Vigneswaran, and J. Kandasamy. 2010. Modelling of Submerged Membrane Flocculation Hybrid Systems Using Statistical and Artificial Neural Networks Methods. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. 59(2–3): 198–208.

P. M. Nørgård, O. Ravn, L. K. Hansen, and N. K. Poulsen. 2006. The NNSYSID Toolbox-a Matlab toolbox for System Identification with Neural Networks. IEEE Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design. 374–379.

H.-G. Han, J.-F. Qiao, and Q.-L. Chen. 2012. Model Predictive Control of Dissolved Oxygen Concentration based on a Self-organizing RBF Neural Network. Control Eng. Pract. 20: 465–476.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-18

How to Cite

Permeate Flux Measurement and Prediction of Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Filtration Process Using Intelligent Techniques. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 73(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4251