THE HYDRO PLANING SIMULATION OF FLYING BOAT REMOTE CONTROL MODEL

Authors

  • S. Syamsuar Faculty of Marine Technology, Tenth of November Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • E. B. Djatmiko Faculty of Marine Technology, Tenth of November Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Erwandi Erwandi Indonesian Hydrodynamics Laboratory, Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • A. S. Mujahid Indonesian Hydrodynamics Laboratory, Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Subchan Subchan National Robotics Centre, Tenth of November Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4267

Keywords:

Laser camera, CATIA, CFX ANSYS, Thrust per Weight ratio, Flying Boat remote control model

Abstract

The measurement of unknown model to get the three dimensions of object configuration is by using the laser camera photo tracking. The three dimensions model became from solid drawing on the CATIA software. The CFX ANSYS computational fluid dynamics software is used on the 3D of Flying Boat remote control model full configuration. The rectangular and dihedral configurations of the model have Z forces value during acceleration on the water surface. The pressure distributions hydro planing have a good result also. The speeds on the simulation model are around (0 - 25) knots and Angle of Attack, α = 00.  The downwash effect and vortex could be shown in the CFD results. To verify the simulation data analysis is uses the takeoff flight performance testing data during takeoff of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle “Alap alap†with the same Thrust per Weight ratio around 0.4, such as altitude height, airspeed, Z acceleration and pitch angle data. The hump drag of Flying Boat remote control model and the friction during takeoff of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle have been ignored.

References

Anderson, J. D. Jr. 1995. Computational Fluid Dynamics, The Basics with Applications. Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, Mc. Graw Hill, Inc., New York.

Taylor, G. 2003. Re-defining Sea Level: The Hoverwing Wing In Ground Effect Vehicle. Fischer Flugmechanik/ AFD Airfoil Development GmbH, Germany. Paper for the Hovercraft Society, Air Cushion Technology Conference & Exhibition, England.

Yoshiho, I. and K. Toru. 2000. Porpoising Oscillations of a Very High Speed Marine craft. Department of Marine System Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University.

Collu, M. and M. H. Patel, Florent Trarieux. 2008. A Mathematical Model To Analyze The Static Stability Of Hybrid (Aero-Hydrodynamically Supported) Vehicles. Presented At The 8 Th. Symposium On High Speed Marine Vehicle, Naples.

Collu, M., M. H. Patel and Florent Trarieux. 2007. A Unified Mathematical Model for High Speed Hybrid (Air and Water borne) Vehicles. Cranfield University, United Kingdom.

O. M. Faltinsen. 2005. Hydrodynamics of High Speed Marine Vehicles. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press.

P. Roglev. 2013. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Amphibious Aircraft of Unconventional Aerodynamic Configurations. Po. Box 26, 4001, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Syamsuar, S., E. B. Djatmiko, P. A. Wilson, Erwandi, and Subchan. 2013. The Flight Performance Criteria for Adaptive Control Design during Hydro Planing and Ground Effect Altitude for Wing In Surface Effect craft. International Review of Mechanical Engineering (I.R.E.M.E). 7(4): 633-645.

Syamsuar, S. 2015. The Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Flying Boat on the Ground Effect Altitude: Case Study: A Flying Boat Remote Control Model at 0.20 m and 1.0 m Altitude. Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Warta Ardhia. 3.

T. I. Fossen. 2005. A Non-Linear Unified State Space Model For Ship Maneuvering And Control In Seaway, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.

T. Abramowski. 2007. Numerical Investigation of Airfoil in Ground Proximity, Faculty of Maritime Technology, Technical University of Szczecin. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Warsaw.

T. Benson. 2005. Downwash Effect On Lift. Glenn Research Center, NASA.

Perez, T., O. N. Smogeli, T. I. Fossen, and A. J. Sorensen. 2006. An Overview of the Marine Systems Simulator (MSS): A Simulink Toolbox for Marine Control Systems, Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures, Department of Marine Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Jamaluddin, A. 2004. Analisa dan Pengujian Hidrodinamika Kapal Bersayap (WISE 10). Indonesian Hydrodynamic Laboratory.

Muhammad, H. 2005. Technical Report, Design Configuration, Preliminary Design. Part I-A WiSE Aerodynamic Prediction based on DATCOM, LPPM ITB, Bandung.

Ansys Training Manual. 2009. Chapter 1 Introduction to CFD/ CFX, Inc. Proprietary.

E. Lasauskas, T. Lutz and M. Dietz. 2007. Influence of Trailing Edge Tab On Moment Characteristics of NACA 23012 Airfoil.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-30

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

THE HYDRO PLANING SIMULATION OF FLYING BOAT REMOTE CONTROL MODEL. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4267