COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF CELL GROWTH OF FRESHWATER MICROALGA CHLORELLA SP. IN PHOTOAUTOTROPHIC, HETEROTROPHIC AND MIXOTROPHIC CULTURES

Authors

  • Costantine Joannes Energy and Materials Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Rachel Fran Mansa Energy and Materials Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Suhaimi Md. Yasir Seaweed Research Unit, Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Jedol Dayou Energy, Vibration and Sound Research Group (e-VIBS), Faculty of Science and Natural Resources Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4349

Keywords:

Biodiesel, chlorella sp., photoautotrophic, heterotrophic, mixotrophic, cell concentration, growth rate

Abstract

Lately, research on biodiesel production as a renewable and sustainable energy has become increasingly apparent due to the fact that fossil fuel is decreasing and the concern of global warming issues. The third generation of biofuel, which is microalgae-based biodiesel had gained interest over the last decade. The ability of microalgae to grow in various conditions is one of its advantages as the potential and promising feedstock for biodiesel. Microalgae can be cultivated in three modes such as photoautotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic culture mode. Unlike photoautotrophic mode where light is required, the heterotrophic mode mainly utilized carbon compounds to grow. On the other hand, the mixotrophic mode is the condition where light and carbon compounds are supplied for microalgae culturing. This paper investigates the cell growth of Chlorella sp. cultivated in photoautotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic culture mode. It was found that Chlorella sp. was capable of producing the highest cell concentration of 6.67 ± 0.56 x 106 cell mL-1 in the photoautotrophic mode for 23 days of cultivation period. This was 1.3 times and 3.2 times greater than the cell concentration in mixotrophic (5.02 ± 0.49 x 106 cell mL-1) and heterotrophic (2.03 ± 0.29 x 106 cell mL-1) culture, respectively. On the contrary, the highest specific growth rate obtained in the study was from heterotrophic mode (0.32 ± 0.04 day-1) followed by photoautotrophic and mixotrophic mode with 0.26 ± 0.05 day-1 and 0.20 ± 0.04 day-1, respectively. Chlorella sp. cell grew well under the photoautotrophic and mixotrophic mode. However, the insufficient of glucose level had contributed to lower cells productivity in the heterotrophic culture. Therefore, the mixotrophic mode could also be an alternative pathway in microalgae cultivation for biodiesel production if the glucose supplied was adequate and at the suitable level.  

Author Biographies

  • Costantine Joannes, Energy and Materials Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

    Faculty of Engineering,

    Research Assistant

  • Rachel Fran Mansa, Energy and Materials Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

    Faculty of Engineering, 

    Associate Professor Dr.

  • Suhaimi Md. Yasir, Seaweed Research Unit, Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

    Faculty of Science and Natural Resources

    Associate Professor Dr.

  • Jedol Dayou, Energy, Vibration and Sound Research Group (e-VIBS), Faculty of Science and Natural Resources Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

    Faculty of Science and Natural Resources

    Associate Professor Dr.

References

The State of Food Insecurity In The World Strengthening The Enabling Environment for Food Security and Nutrition, Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Rome, 2014.

Rawat, I., Ranjit-Kumar, R., Mutanda, T., and Bux, F. 2013. Biodiesel from Microalgae: A Critical Evaluation from Laboratory to Large Scale Production. Applied Energy. 103: 444-467.

Malaysia Palm Oil Board (MPOB). Biodiesel [Online]. From: http://econ.mpob.gov.my/economy/biodiesel/Directory%20of%20Biodiesel%20Producers%209.2.11.pdf. [Accessed on 28 Feb 2015).

Mansa, R. F., Tahir, A., Hua, L. M., Dayou, J. and Stephen-Sipaut, C. 2012. Design of a Pilot Scale Outdoor Photobioreactor for Mass Cultivation of Local Microalga. International Journal of Engineering and Physical Sciences. 348-352.

Chisti, Y. 2007. Biodiesel from Microalgae. Biotechnology Advances. 25: 294-306.

Schenk, P., Thomas-Hall, S., Stephens, E., Marx, U., Mussgnug, J., Posten, C., Olaf, K. and Ben, H. 2008. Second Generation Biofuels: High-Efficiency Microalgae for Biodiesel Production. Bio Energy Research. 1(1): 20-43.

Suali, E. and Sarbatly, R. 2012. Conversion of Microalgae to Biofuel. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(6): 4316-4342.

Joannes, C., Sipaut, C. S., Dayou, J., Yasir, S. M. and Mansa, R. F. 2015. The Potential of Using Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) Technology as the Cell Disruption Method to Extract Lipid from Microalgae for Biodiesel Production, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research. 5(2): 598-621.

Lam, M. K. and Lee, K. T., 2012. Microalgae Biofuels: A Critical Review of Issues, Problems and the Way Forward. Biotechnology Advances. 30: 673-690.

Brennan, L. and Owende, P. 2010. Biofuels from Microalgae -A Review of Technologies for Pro-Duction, Processing, and Extractions of Biofuels and Co-Products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14: 557-577.

Suali, E., R. Sarbatly, and S. R. Muhamad-Shaleh. 2012. Characterisation of Local Chlorella sp. towards Biofuel Production. International Conference on Applied Energy (ICAE) 2012. Suzhou, China. 5-8 July 2012. 2965-2970.

Abreu, A. P., Fernandes, B., Vicente, A. A., Teixeira, J. and Dragone, G. 2012. Mixotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella Vulgaris Using Industrial Dairy Waste as Organic Carbon Source. Biosource Technology. 118: 61-66.

Li, T., Zheng, Y., Yu, L. and Chen, S. 2014. Mixotrophic Cultivation of a Chlorella sorokiniana Strain for Enhanced Biomass and Lipid Production. Biomass and Bioenergy. 1-10.

Heredia-Arroyo, T., Wei, W., Ruan, R. and Hu, B. 2011. Mixotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and Its Potential Application for the Oil Accumulation from Non-Sugar Materials. Biomass and Bioenergy. 35: 2245-2253.

Rasoul-Amini, S., Montazeri-Najafabady, N., Mobasher, M. A., Hoseini-Alhashemi, S. and Ghasemi, Y. 2011. Chlorella sp.: A New Strain with Highly Saturated Fatty Acids for Biodiesel Production In Bubble-Column Photobioreactor. Applied Energy. 88: 3354-3356.

Sarbatly, R. and Suali, E. 2014. Indirect Membrane-Based Bubbling as an Alternative Technique to Increase the Carbonation of Microalgal Media. Algal Research. 5: 274-282.

Benedict’s Soultion, National Biochemicals Corps. [Online].From:http://www.nationalbiochem.com/pdf/pis/MB4755%20PS.pdf. [Accessed on 14 Dec 2014].

Wang, Y., Rischer, H., Eriksen, N. T. and Wiebe, M. G. 2013. Mixotrophic Continuous Flow Cultivation of Chlorella protothecoides for Lipids. Bioresource Technology. 144: 608-614.

Xie, T., Sun, Y., Du, K., Ling, B., Cheng, R. and Zhang, Y. 2012. Optimization of Heterotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella sp. for Oil Production. Biosource Technology. 118: 235-242.

Cerón-García, M. C., Macías-Sánchez, M. D., Sánchez-Mirón, A., García-Camacho, F. and Molina-Grima, E. 2013. A Process for Biodiesel Production Involving the Heterotrophic Fermentation of Chlorella protothecoides with Glycerol as the Carbon Source. Applied Energy. 103: 341-349.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF CELL GROWTH OF FRESHWATER MICROALGA CHLORELLA SP. IN PHOTOAUTOTROPHIC, HETEROTROPHIC AND MIXOTROPHIC CULTURES. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4349