Simulation Study on Electrical Resistance Tomography using Metal Wall for Bubble Detection

Authors

  • Suzanna Ridzuan Aw Faculty of Electrical & Automation Engineering Technology, Terengganu Advance Technical Institute University College (TATiUC), Jalan Panchor, Telok Kalong, 24000, Kemaman, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Ruzairi Abdul Rahim Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Hafiz Fazalul Rahiman School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Elmy Johana Mohamad Department of Mechatronics and Robotics, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400, Johor, Malaysia
  • Fazlul Rahman Mohd Yunus Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Yasmin Abdul Wahab Department of Instrumentation & Control Engineering (ICE), Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Naizatul Shima Fadzil Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Juliza Jamaludin Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4403

Keywords:

Electrical resistance tomography, metal wall, conducting boundary, bubble

Abstract

Industrial process pipelines are mostly known to be constructed from metal which is a conducting material. Bubbles or gas detection are crucial in facilitating the bubble columns performance. By employing the Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) technique, a simulation study using COMSOL has been conducted to investigate the effect of excitation strategy, bubble sizes and locations towards the metal wall system. As for the current excitation strategy, conducting boundary protocol has to be applied when it comes to metallic vessel to overcome the grounding effect.  Bubbles with a greater size than 2 mm and especially the one that is located near the wall boundary are much easier to detect. Further potential improvements to the current design and image reconstruction of the ERT system are desirable to improve the detection of small and centred bubble. 

References

L. G. Neal and S. G. Bankoff. 1964. A High Resolution Resistivity Probe for Determination of Local Void Properties in Gas–Liquid Flow. 490–494.

M. D. Supardan, Y. Masuda, A. Maezawa, and S. Uchida. 2007. The Investigation of Gas Holdup Distribution in a Two-phase Bubble Column Using Ultrasonic Computed Tomography. Chemical Engineering Journal. 130: 125–133.

M. Fransolet, P. Crine, P. Marchot, and D. Toye. 2005. Analysis of Gas Holdup in Bubble Columns with Non-newtonian Fluid Using Electrical Resistance Tomography and Dynamic Gas Disengagement Technique. Chemical Engineering Science. 6118–6123.

M. Hamidipour and F. Larachi. 2010. Characterizing the Liquid Dynamics in Cocurrent Gas-liquid Flows in Porous Media Using Twin-plane Electrical Capacitance Tomography. Chemical Engineering Journal. 165: 310–323.

H. Jin, Y. Lian, Y. Qin, S. Yang, and G. He. 2012. Distribution Characteristics of Holdups in a Multi-stage Bubble Column Using Electrical Resistance Tomography.

H. Jin, M. Wang, and R. A. Williams. 2007. Analysis of Bubble Behaviors in Bubble Columns Using Electrical Resistance Tomography. Chemical Engineering Journal. 130: 179–185.

H. Jin, S. Yang, M. Wang, and R. A. Williams. 2007. Measurement of gas Holdup Profiles in a Gas Liquid Cocurrent Bubble Column Using Electrical Resistance Tomography. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 18: 191–196.

M. A.-D. Junli Xue, M. P. Dudukovic, R. F. Mudde. 2007. Bubble Velocity, Size, and Interfacial Area Measurements in a Bubble Column By Four-point Optical Probe. AICHE. Wiley online.

J. Kourunen, T. Niitti, and L. M. Heikkinen. 2011.Application of Three-dimensional Electrical Resistance Tomography to Characterize Gas Holdup Distribution in Laboratory Flotation Cell. Minerals Engineering. 24: 1677–1686.

A. Shaikh and M. Al-Dahhan. 2005. Characterization of the Hydrodynamic Flow Regime in Bubble Columns via Computed Tomography. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 16: 91–98.

V. P. Chilekar1, M. J. F. Warnier1, J. van der Schaaf, B. F. M. Kuster, J. C. Schouten, J. R. van Ommen. 2005. Bubble Size Estimation in Slurry Bubble Columns from Pressure Fluctuations. AICHE. Wiley online.

M. R. Widyanto, M. B. Utomo, K. Kawamoto, B. Kusumoputro, and K. Hirota. 2006. Local Gas Holdup Measurement of a Bubble Column Using SONIA-ultrasonic Non-invasive Method. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 126: 447–454.

Z. Cao and L. Xu. 2012. Direct Image Reconstruction for 3D Electrical Resistance Tomography by Using The Factorization Method. In 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, I2MTC 2012, May 13, 2012–May 16, 2012, Graz, Austria. 1919–1922.

J. K. L M Heikkinen, T. Savolainen, P J Vauhkonen, J P Kaipio and M Vauhkonen. 2006. Real Time Three-dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography Applied in Multiphase Flow Imaging. Measurement Science and Technology. 17.

H. Jin, S. Yang, G. He, M. Wang, and R. A. Williams. 2010. The Effect of Gas-liquid Counter-current Operation on Gas Hold-up in Bubble Columns Using Electrical Resistance Tomography. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 85: 1278–1283.

Y. Xu, H. Wang, Z. Cui, and F. Dong. 2009. Application of Electrical Resistance Tomography for Slug Flow Measurement in Gas/Liquid Flow of Horizontal Pipe. In 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Imaging Systems and Techniques, IST 2009, May 11, 2009 - May 12, 2009, Hong Kong, China. 319–323.

F. Dong, E.-P. Li, and B.-B. Wang. 2007. Optimization Design of Electrical Resistance Tomography Data Acquisition System. In 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, ICMLC 2007, August 19, 2007–August 22, 2007, Hong Kong, China. 1454–1458.

F. Dong, C. Tan, J. Liu, Y. Xu, and H. Wang. 2006. Development of Single Drive Electrode Electrical Resistance Tomography System. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 55: 1208–1214.

M. Sharifi and B. Young. 2012. Qualitative Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Milk Flow Using Electrical Resistance Tomography. Journal of Food Engineering. 112: 227–242.

C. Yang, H. Wang, and Z. Cui. 2012. Application of Electrical Resistance Tomography in Bubble Columns for Volume Fraction Measurement. In 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, I2MTC 2012, May 13, 2012–May 16, 2012, Graz, Austria. 1199–1203.

B. D. Grieve. 2002. On-line Electrical Impedance Tomography for Industrial Batch Processing. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Chemical Engineering, UMIST Manchester, UK.

M. S. B. A. Plaskowski, R. Thorn and T. Dyakowski. 1995. Imaging Industrial Flow. London: IOP Publishing Ltd.

C. Tan and F. Dong. 2009. Gas-Water Two-Phase Flow Regime Identification with Feature Fusion from an ERT System and a VCone Meter. IEEE. 2: 218–222.

S. Hosseini, D. Patel, F. Ein-Mozaffari, and M. Mehrvar, "Study of solid-liquid mixing in agitated tanks through electrical resistance tomography," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 65, pp. 1374-1384, 2010.

C. Tan, F. Dong, and M. Wu. 2007. Identification of Gas/Liquid Two-phase Flow Regime Through ERT-based Measurement and Feature Extraction. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 18: 255–261.

S. J. Stanley and G. T. Bolton. 2008. A Review of Recent Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) Applications for Wet Particulate Processing. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization. 25: 207–215.

M. Kaminoyama, K. Nishi, R. Misumi, and A. Tagawa. 2007. Presented at the 5th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Bergen, Norway.

L. Pakzad, F. Ein-Mozaffari, and P. Chan. 2008. Measuring Mixing Time in the Agitation of Non-newtonian Fluids Through Electrical Resistance Tomography. Chemical Engineering and Technology. 31: 1838–1845.

F. Dickin and M. Wang. 1996. Electrical Resistance Tomography for Process Applications. Measurement Science and Technology. 7: 247–260.

J. L. Davidson. 2004. Three-dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography Applied to a Metal-walled Filtration Test Platform. Measurement Science and Technology. 15: 2263–2274.

S. G. Liter, J. R. Torczynski, K. A. Shollenberger, and S. L. Ceccio. 2002. Electrical-Impedance Tomography for Opaque Multiphase Flows in Metallic (Electrically-Conducting) Vessels. Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (US); Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (US).

M. Wang, F. J. Dickin, and R. A. Williams. 1994. Electrical Resistance Tomography of Metal Walled Vessels and Pipelines. Electronics Letters. 30: 71–773.

J. L. Davidson, L. S. Ruffino, D. R. Stephenson, R. Mann, B. D. Grieve, and T. A. York. 2004. Three-dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography Applied to a Metal-walled Filtration Test Platform. Measurement Science and Technology. 15: 2263.

Downloads

Published

2015-04-13

Issue

Vol. 73 No. 6: Special Issue on Sensor Technology and Control System Applications Vol. 2

Section

Science and Engineering

License

Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.

How to Cite

Simulation Study on Electrical Resistance Tomography using Metal Wall for Bubble Detection. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 73(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4403