PVDF MEMBRANE FOR OIL-IN-WATER SEPARATION VIA CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION PROCESS

Authors

  • A. Moslehyani Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • M. Mobaraki Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • A. F. Ismail Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • M. H. D. Othman Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • A. Mayahi Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • E. Shamsaei Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • M. S. Abdullah Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • M. Razis Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4469

Keywords:

PVDF, membrane, UF, oil in water, separation

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the potential of ultrafiltration polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-titanium dioxide (TiO2) membrane for oil-in-water separator. PVDF polymeric matrix membrane is excellent in term of chemical and thermal stabilities, which make it very promising to be used as a membrane matrix for water separation. However, poor hydrophilic property of the PVDF has led to the severe fouling during operation. Thus, current work was performed to investigate the effect of incorporation of two additives i.e. polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) in PVDF-TiO2 membrane, which fabricated using dry/wet phase inversion technique. Membranes characterizations were performed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact angle and UV-vis spectrophotometer. Accordingly, modified PVDF membrane possessed good hydrophilicity property when the additives were added into PVDF-TiO2 membrane matrix. In term of filtration performance, the experimental results showed that oil rejection using PVDF-TiO2/PVP membrane were ~99.7%, which met the requirement for discharge. On the other hand, PVDF-TiO2/PEG membrane was shown more enhancement in terms of permeate flux by given over 64 (L/m2h) at pressure of 2 bar gauge.

References

J. C. Campos, R. M. H. Borges, A. M. d. Oliveira Filho, R. Nobrega. 2002. Oilfield Wastewater Treatment by Combined Microfiltration and Biological Processes. Water Research. 36: 95-104.

X. Zhao, Y. Wang, Z. Ye, A.G. Borthwick, J. Ni. 2006. Oil Field Wastewater Treatment in Biological Aerated Filter by Immobilized Microorganisms. Process Biochemistry. 41: 1475-1483.

M. Padaki, R.S. Murali, M. Abdullah, N. Misdan, A. Moslehyani, M. Kassim, N. Hilal, A. Ismail. 2015. Membrane Technology Enhancement in Oil–Water Separation. A Review. Desalination. 357: 197-207.

S. Tao, F. Xu, W. Liu, Y. Cui, R.M. Coveney. 2006. A Chemical Extraction Method for Mimicking Bioavailability of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons to Wheat Grown In Soils Containing Various Amounts of Organic Matter. Environmental Science & Technology. 40: 2219-2224.

M. Trapido. 1999. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Estonian Soil: Contamination and Profiles. Environmental Pollution. 105: 67-74.

C. Murray-Gulde, J. E. Heatley, T. Karanfil, J. H. Rodgers Jr, J. E. Myers. 2003. Performance of a Hybrid Reverse Osmosis-Constructed Wetland Treatment System for Brackish Oil Field Produced Water. Water Research. 37: 705-713.

Z. M. Liu, Y. Q. Jin, G. Q. Yuan, M. J. Law. 2013. The Treatment and Disposal of Produced Water from Onshore Oilfields. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 361: 567-573.

R. Patrick, E. Ford, J. Quarles. 1987. Groundwater contamination in the United States, University of Pennsylvania Press.

L. J. Puckett. 1995. Identifying the Major Sources of Nutrient Water Pollution. Environmental Science & Technology. 29: 408A-414A.

M. N. K. Chowdhury, A. F. Ismail, M. R. Khan, M. D. H. Beg, M. H. D. Othman, R. J. Gohari, A. Moslehyani. 2015. Physicochemical and Micromechanical Investigation of a Nanocopper Impregnated Fibre Reinforced Nanocomposite. RSC Advances. 5: 100943-100955.

C. J. Patton, J. R. Kryskalla. 2003. Methods of Analysis by the US Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: Evaluation of Alkaline Persulfate Digestion as an Alternative to Kjeldahl Digestion for Determination of Total and Dissolved Nitrogen and Phosphorus In Water, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey,

A. Moslehyani, A. Ismail, M. Othman, T. Matsuura. 2015. Design and Performance Study of Hybrid Photocatalytic Reactor-PVDF/MWCNT Nanocomposite Membrane System for Treatment of Petroleum Refinery Wastewater. Desalination. 363: 99-111.

A. Moslehyani, A. Ismail, M. Othman, T. Matsuura. 2015. Hydrocarbon Degradation and Separation of Bilge Water Via a Novel Tio 2-Hnts/PVDF-Based Photocatalytic Membrane Reactor (PMR). RSC Advances. 5: 14147-14155.

A. Moslehyani, A. Ismail, M.H.D. Othman, B. Ng, S. Abdullah, M. A. Rahman. 2013 PHOTOCATALYTIC MEMBRANE REAC. MST2013: 1-5.

A. Asatekin, A. M. Mayes. 2009. Oil Industry Wastewater Treatment with Fouling Resistant Membranes Containing Amphiphilic Comb Copolymers. Environmental Science & Technology. 43: 4487-4492.

F. A. Osamor, R. C. Ahlert. 1978. Oil/water Separation: State-of-the-art, Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency.

C. Igwe, A. Saadi, S. Ngene. 2013. Optimal Options for Treatment of Produced Water in Offshore Petroleum Platforms. J Pollut Eff Cont. 1: 2.

S. Alzahrani, A. W. Mohammad, N. Hilal, P. Abdullah, O. Jaafar. 2013. Identification of Foulants, Fouling Mechanisms and Cleaning Efficiency for NF and RO Treatment of Produced Water. Separation and Purification Technology. 118: 324-341.

A. Moslehyani, A. F. Ismail, M. Othman, A. M. Isloor. 2015. Novel hybrid photocatalytic reactor-UF nanocomposite membrane system for bilge water degradation and separation. RSC Advances. 5: 45331-45340.

A. Moslehyani, M. Mobaraki, A. Ismail, T. Matsuura, S. Hashemifard, M. Othman, A. Mayahi, M. R. DashtArzhandi, M. Soheilmoghaddam, E. Shamsaei. 2015. Effect of HNTs Modification in Nanocomposite Membrane Enhancement for Bacterial Removal by Cross-Flow Ultrafiltration System. Reactive and Functional Polymers. 95: 80-87.

J. N. Meegoda, A. Ezeldin, H.-Y. Fang, H. I. Inyang. 2003. Waste Immobilization Technologies. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management. 7: 46-58.

J. G. Palacas, L. A. Ribera, B. A. McCarl, J. Zenteno. 1984. Petroleum Geochemistry and Source Rock Potential of Carbonate Rocks. Tul~: AAPG Studies in Geology. 18: 2.

J. P. Chen, H. Mou, L. K. Wang, T. Matsuura. 2006. Membrane Filtration. In: Advanced Physicochemical Treatment Processes. Springer. 203-259.

C. Siskens. 1996. Applications of Ceramic Membranes in Liquid Filtration. Membrane Science and Technology. 4: 619-639.

R.-S. Juang, R.-C. Shiau. 2000. Metal Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Chitosan-Enhanced Membrane Filtration. Journal of Membrane Science. 165: 159-167.

V. Lahoussine-Turcaud, M.R. Wiesner, J.-Y. Bottero. 1990. Fouling in Tangential-Flow Ultrafiltration: The Effect of Colloid Size and Coagulation Pretreatment. Journal of Membrane Science. 52: 173-190.

X. Zhang, Q. Hu, M. Sommerfeld, E. Puruhito, Y. Chen. 2010. Harvesting Algal Biomass for Biofuels Using Ultrafiltration Membranes. Bioresource Technology. 101: 5297-5304.

A. Moslehyani, O. Nasser, R. Junin, E. Halakoo, A. Ismail. 2013. Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane for Oil-in-Water Emulsion Separation. MST2013: 1-5.

L. Brink, S. Elbers, T. Robbertsen, P. Both. 1993. The anti-Fouling Action of Polymers Preadsorbed on Ultrafiltration And Microfiltration Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 76: 281-291.

H. Basri, A. Ismail, M. Aziz. 2011. Polyethersulfone (PES)–Silver Composite UF Membrane: Effect of Silver Loading and PVP Molecular Weight on Membrane Morphology and Antibacterial Activity. Desalination. 273: 72-80.

L. Yan, S. Hong, M.L. Li, Y.S. Li. 2009. Application of the Al< sub> 2 O< sub> 3–PVDF Nanocomposite Tubular Ultrafiltration (UF) Membrane for Oily Wastewater Treatment and Its Antifouling Research. Separation and Purification Technology. 66: 347-352.

V. R. Pereira, A. M. Isloor, A. A. Ahmed, A. F. Ismail. 2015. Preparation, Characterization and the Effect of PANI Coated Tio2 Nanocomposites on the Performance of Polysulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes. New Journal of Chemistry. 39: 703-712.

S. Singh, K. Khulbe, T. Matsuura, P. Ramamurthy. 1998. Membrane Characterization by Solute Transport and Atomic Force Microscopy. Journal of Membrane Science. 142: 111-127.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

PVDF MEMBRANE FOR OIL-IN-WATER SEPARATION VIA CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION PROCESS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 78(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4469