An Overview of Effective Postgraduate Supervision Style Based on Assessment and Supervisory Model

Authors

  • Farizah Ansarudin Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Siti Masrinda Tasirin Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zaidi Omar Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Fauzi Mohd. Zain Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Zulhaidi Amil Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd. Huzairi Johari Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Roslena Md Zaini Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nor Rajaie Hashim Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Siti Nurul Hunadia Husin Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nooraini Ahmad Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4558

Keywords:

Supervision concept, research, postgraduate development

Abstract

Research process involves personal and professional relationship between students and supervisors. Successful research can be achieved if sustainable supervisor-student relationship is attained along the research journey. It is supervisors’ role to challenge and extend their students abilities in all areas to ensure their success in research timely. In this case, students’ abilities or progress must be assessed and evaluated. Evaluation and assessment is thus very important for any research and educational process. This paper overview the use of different evaluation as well as assessment systems for postgraduate supervision. Different methods of supervision are also briefly overviewed. Group supervision is probably to be most reliable model practiced by several institutions to conduct research students due to increasing numbers or students as well as demanding from academic environment hold by supervisor including administration commitments.

References

Hussain, A. 2011. Supervision and Evaluation of Research Projects of Graduate Students. Journal of Quality and Technology Management. 7(2): 123–137.

Hammond, J., Ryland, K., Tennant, M. and Boud, D. 2010. Building Research Supervision and Training across Australian Universities: Final Report. Sydney: University of Technology, Sydney.

Cullen, D., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., and Spear, R.H. 1994. Establishing Effective PhD Supervision. Canberra: AGPS.

Tim Manhard, Roeland van der Rijst, Jan van Tartwijk and Theo Wubbles. 2009. A Model for the Supervisor-Doctoral Student Relationship. Higher Education. 58: 359–373.

Affero, I and Norhasni, Z. A. 2009. The Importance of Graduate Students’ Needs on Supervisory Contribution in a Malaysian Public University. The Social Sciences. 4(4): 335–265.

Norhasni, Z. A. and Aminuddin, H. 2012. A Review of Effective Mentoring Practices for Mentees Development. Journal of Studies in Education. 2(1): 72–89.

Nur Rifhan A. Rahim, Ahmad Jusoh and Hamdan Said. 2013. Peranan Perkongsian Pengetahuan Terhadap Jangkaan Tempoh Graduasi Mahasiswa Pasca Ijazah. Jurnal Teknologi. 64(1): 23–32.

Dietz, A. (Ton), Jonathan D. Jansen, Ahmed A. Wadee. 2006. Effective PhD Supervision and Mentorship. Rozenberg Publishers: Amsterdam.

Rodger, S., and Brown, G. T. 2000. Enhancing Graduate Supervision in Occupational Therapy Education Through Alternative Delivery. Occupational Therapy International. 7(3):163–172.

Wright, J. and Griffiths, F. 2010. Reflective Practice at a Distance: Using Technology in Counselling Supervision. Reflective Practice. 11(5): 693–703.

Kevin Grant, Ray Hackney and David Edgar. 2014. Postgraduate Research Supervision: An ‘Agreed’ Conceptual View of Good Practice through Derived Metaphors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 9: 44–60.

Zuber-Skerrit, O and Roche, V. 2004. A Constructivist Model for Evaluating Postgraduate Supervision: A Case Study. Quality Assurance in Education. 12(2): 82–93.

Pearson, M. 2000. Flexible Postgraduate Research Supervision in an Open System. Quality in Postgraduate Research: Making Ends Meet. Proceedings of the 2000 Quality in Postgraduate Research Conference in Adelaide, Australia. 103–118.

Samara, A. 2006. Group Supervision in Graduate Education: A Process of Supervision Skill Development and Text Improvement. Higher Education Research and Development. 25(2): 115–129.

Dysthe, O., Samara, A., and Westrheim, K. 2006. Multivoiced Supervision of Master’s Students: A Case Study of Alternative Supervision Practices In Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education. 31(3): 299–318.

Pare, D., Audet, C., Caputo, A., Hatch, K., and Wong-Wylie, G. 2004. Courageous Practice: Tales from Reflective Supervision. Canadian Journal of Counselling. 38(2): 118–130.

Kandlbinder, P. 1998. Transforming Post-graduate Supervision. Online Conference Proceedings. HERDSA.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-14

How to Cite

An Overview of Effective Postgraduate Supervision Style Based on Assessment and Supervisory Model. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 74(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4558