Hydrodynamic Resistance analysis of New Hull Design for Multipurpose Amphibious Vehicle Applying with Finite Volume Method

Authors

  • M. Nakisa Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Boushehr Branch, Boushehr, Iran
  • A. Maimun Marine Technology Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Yasser M. Ahmed Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
  • F. Behrouzi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • S. Steen Rolls-Royce University Technology Centre , Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
  • A. Tarmizi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4644

Keywords:

Multipurpose amphibious vehicle, hydrodynamic resistance, RANS code

Abstract

This paper numerically investigated the hydrodynamic resistance of Multipurpose Amphibious Vehicles (MAV) in three bow shapes to approach the better hull bow shape design. This type of vehicle and other blunt-shaped floating vehicles encounter the problem of a large bow wave forming at high speeds. This wave formation is accompanied by higher resistance and at a critical speed results in bow submergence or swamping. Three new shapes of hull bow design for the multipurpose amphibious vehicle were conducted at several speeds to investigate the hydrodynamic phenomena using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD, RANS code) which is applied by Ansys-CFX14.0 and Maxsurf. The vehicle’s hydrodynamic bow shapes were able to break up induced waves and avoid swamping. Comparative results with the vehicle fitted with U-shape, V-shape and Flat-shape of hull bow, showed that the U-shape of the hull bow has reduced the total resistance to 20.3% and 13.6% compared with the V-shape and flat shape respectively. Though, the U-shape of hull bow is capable to increase the amphibious operating life and speed of vehicle in calm water. Also it has ability to reduce the vehicle’s required power, fossil fuel consumption and wetted hull surface.

References

G. Haddock and R. Latorre. 1995. A Look Back on 1942 Combat and Production, An Example of Successful Employee Empowerment at Higgins Industries. Journal of Ship Production. 11(3): 159–170.

D. Carl. June 1965. New Amphibious Vehicle Progress Part 3nlanding Craft, Assault LCA and Landing Vehicle Hydrofoil (LVH). Naval Engineering Journal. 77(3): 18–25.

R. Alexander and R. M. Alexander. 1963. Design of Landing Craft for Marine Corps Action. Naval Engineering Journal. 75(1): 163–170.

C. Foss. 2003. Jane’s Tank and Combat Vehicle Recognition Guide. Harper Collins, New York.

S. Helvacioglu, I. H. Helvacioglu and B. Tuncer. 2011. Improving the River Crossing Capability of an Amphibious Vehicle. Ocean Engineering. 38: 2201–2207.

K. Jaswar , Siow, C.L., Maimun, A., Guedes Soares. 2014. Estimation of Electrical-wave Power in Merang Shore, Terengganu, Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering). 66(2): 9–14.

Marine Corps Warfighting Publication. 2005. Employment of Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAVs), /http://www.doctrine.usmc.mils, MCWP. 3–13.

J. G. Sticker, A. J. Becnel and J. G. Purnell. 1994. Advanced Waterjet Systems. Nav. Eng. J. 106(5): 100–109.

H. H. Chun, B. H. Ahn and S. M. Cha. 2003. Self-Propulsion Test and Analysis of an Amphibious Tracked Vehicle with Waterjet. In: Proceeding of World Maritime Technology Conference and SNAME Annual Meeting, Paper No. D6 (D-133), USA.

M. Nakisa, Malik, A. M. A , Ahmed, Y. M. , Steen, S., Behrouzi, F., Hassanzadeh, R., Sabki, A. F. 2014. Propeller Effect on 3D Flow at the Stern Hull of a LNG Carrier Using Finite Volume Method. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 554: 566–570.

M. Nakisa, A. Maimun, A. Y. Sian, Yasser M. Ahmed, A. Priyanto, Jaswar, F. Behrouzi. 2013. Three-dimensional Numerical Analysis of Restricted Water Effects on the Flow Pattern Around Hull and Propeller Plane of LNG Ship. International Journal of Mechanics. 7(3): 234–241.

L. Larsson and H. C Raven. 2010. Principles of Naval Architecture Series-Ship Resistance and Flow. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME).

K. MINSAAS and S. STEEN. 2008. Lecture Notes-Ship Resistance, Department of Marine Technology–NTNU, Leishman J. Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 23012 aerofoil. Experiments in Fluids. 9(1): 49e58.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-27

How to Cite

Hydrodynamic Resistance analysis of New Hull Design for Multipurpose Amphibious Vehicle Applying with Finite Volume Method. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 74(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4644