MICROWAVE PLASMA GASIFICATION OF OIL PALM BIOCHAR

Authors

  • N. Ismail Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • G. S. Ho Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • N. A. S. Amin Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • F. N. Ani Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4827

Keywords:

Microwave plasma, gasification, biochar, oil palm biomass, syngas

Abstract

Conventional pressurized gasification operates at higher pressure than atmospheric pressure and requires heat up time during startup. In this study, microwave plasma gasification was used to compensate this problem. The objectives of this paper is to investigate the CO2 microwave gasification of EFB and OPS biochar, and optimizing the char reaction rate through the addition of activated carbon as the microwave absorber. A microwave plasma gasification test rig was designed to produce syngas from oil palm biochar. From the study, it was found that EFB char performed better than OPS char as gasification fuel due to its high porosity and surface area that increased the char reactivity towards CO2. The temperature increment promoted by the addition of MW absorber using activated carbon (AC) has increased the CO composition. The optimum condition for microwave plasma char gasification of EFB was 3 lpm with 25 wt% AC that produced syngas with 1.23 vol% CH4, 20.88 vol% CO2, 43.83 vol% CO, 34.06 vol% H2 and 9.40 MJ/kg gas CV. For OPS is at 2 lpm with 1.12 vol% CH4, 35.11 vol% CO2, 35.42 vol% CO, 28.35 vol% H2 and 7.32 MJ/kg gas CV. As EFB char has larger BET surface areas and larger pores than OPS char, the ability to react with the gasifying gas is better than the OPS. Thus, resulting in higher carbon conversion. The best gasification efficiency was 72.34% at 3 lpm, 10% AC for EFB biochar plasma gasification with 12% unreacted carbon. For OPS biochar plasma gasification, the best gasification efficiency was 69.09% at 2 lpm, 10% AC with 18% unreacted carbon.

References

Heidenreich, S. and P. U. Foscolo. 2015. New Concepts in Biomass Gasification. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 46(72-95).

Ismail, N. and F. N. Ani. 2014. Solid Waste Management and Treatment in Malaysia. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 699(969-974).

Ong, H., T. Mahlia and H. Masjuki. 2011. A Review on Energy Scenario and Sustainable Energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15(1): 639-647.

Ismail, N. and F. N. Ani. 2014. Syngas Production from Microwave Gasification of Oil Palm Biochars. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 695: 247-250.

Husain, Z., Z. Zainac and Z. Abdullah. 2002. Briquetting of Palm Fibre and Shell from the Processing of Palm Nuts to Palm Oil. Biomass and Bioenergy. 22(6): 505-509.

Abdullah, N., F. Sulaiman and H. Gerhauser. 2011. Characterisation of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches for Fuel Application. J. Phys. Sci. 22(1): 1-24.

Yang, Y., V. Sharifi and J. Swithenbank. 2004. Effect of Air Flow Rate and Fuel Moisture on the Burning Behaviours of Biomass and Simulated Municipal Solid Wastes in Packed Beds. Fuel. 83(11): 1553-1562.

Bhavanam, A. and R. Sastry. 2011. Biomass Gasification Processes in Downdraft Fixed Bed Reactors: A Review. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications. 2(6): 425-433.

Bricka, R. M. and D. C. Swalm. Energy Crop Gasification and Gasification Issues. Mississipi State University.

Higman, C. and M. Van der Burgt. 2011. Gasification. Gulf professional publishing. 12-15.

Kabalan, B., S. Wylie, A. Mason, R. Al-khaddar, A. Al-Shamma'a, C. Lupa, B. Herbert and E. Maddocks. 2011. Real-Time Optimisation of a Microwave Plasma Gasification System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 307: 012027.

Reed, T., T. B. Reed, A. Das and A. Das. 1988. Handbook of Biomass Downdraft Gasifier Engine Systems. Biomass Energy Foundation.

Yoon, S. J. and J. G. Lee. 2011. Syngas Production from Coal through Microwave Plasma Gasification: Influence of Oxygen, Steam, and Coal Particle Size. Energy & Fuels. 26(1): 524-529.

Fridman, A. 2008. Plasma Chemistry. Cambridge University Press. 1.

Sturrock, P. A. Plasma Physics: An Introduction to the Theory of Astrophysical, Geophysical and Laboratory Plasmas. 1994. Cambridge University Press.

Ruj, B. and S. Ghosh. 2014. Technological Aspects for Thermal Plasma Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste—a Review. Fuel Processing Technology. 126(298-308)

Mountouris, A., E. Voutsas and D. Tassios. 2008. Plasma Gasification of Sewage Sludge: Process Development and Energy Optimization. Energy Conversion and Management. 49(8): 2264-2271

Kanilo, P. M., V. I. Kazantsev, N. I. Rasyuk, K. Schünemann and D. M. Vavriv. 2003. Microwave Plasma Combustion of Coal. Fuel. 82(2): 187-193

Ann, P. Z., N. Ismail and F. N. Ani. 2014. The Effect of Flame Temperature, Nozzle Position and Swirl Gas on Microwave Plasma Flame. Jurnal Teknologi. 68(3):

Hadidi, K. and P. Woskov. Very High Power Microwave-Induced Plasma. 2002. Google Patents.

Shin, D. H., Y. C. Hong, S. J. Lee, Y. J. Kim, C. H. Cho, S. H. Ma, S. M. Chun, B. J. Lee and H. S. Uhm. 2013. A Pure Steam Microwave Plasma Torch: Gasification of Powdered Coal in the Plasma. Surface and Coatings Technology. 228, Supplement 1(0): S520-S523

Ismail, N. and F. N. Ani. 2014. A Review on Plasma Treatment for the Processing of Solid Waste. Jurnal Teknologi. 72(5): 41-49

Uhm, H. S., J. H. Kim and Y. C. Hong. 2007. Microwave Steam Torch. Applied Physics Letters. 90(21): 211502-211502-3

Uhm, H. S., Y. C. Hong and D. H. Shin. 2006. A Microwave Plasma Torch and Its Applications. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 15(2): S26-S34

Salema, A. A. and F. N. Ani. 2011. Heating Characteristics of Biomass and Carbonaceous Materials under Microwave Radiation.

Waheed, Q. M. and P. T. Williams. 2013. Hydrogen Production from High Temperature Pyrolysis/Steam Reforming of Waste Biomass: Rice Husk, Sugar Cane Bagasse, and Wheat Straw. Energy & Fuels. 27(11): 6695-6704.

Wan Nik, W., M. Rahman, A. Yusof, F. Ani and C. Adnan. 2006. Production of Activated Carbon from Palm Oil Shell Waste and Its Adsorption Characteristics.

Salema, A. A. and F. N. Ani. 2011. Microwave Induced Pyrolysis of Oil Palm Biomass. Bioresource Technology. 102(3): 3388-3395.

Liu, H., M. Kaneko, C. Luo, S. Kato and T. Kojima. 2004. Effect of Pyrolysis Time on the Gasification Reactivity of Char with CO2 at Elevated Temperatures. Fuel. 83(7): 1055-1061.

Li, K., R. Zhang and J. Bi. 2010. Experimental Study on Syngas Production by Co-Gasification of Coal and Biomass in a Fluidized Bed. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 35(7): 2722-2726.

Kumar, A., D. D. Jones and M. A. Hanna. 2009. Thermochemical Biomass Gasification: A Review of the Current Status of the Technology. Energies. 2(3): 556-581.

Hurt, R., A. Sarofim and J. Longwell. 1991. The Role of Microporous Surface Area in the Gasification of Chars from a Sub-Bituminous Coal. Fuel. 70(9): 1079-1082.

Faisal, M., A. S. Channa, R. Mat and F. N. Ani. 2014. Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis of Waste Biomass Resources for Bio-Oil Production.

Salema, A. A. and F. N. Ani. 2012. Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis of Oil Palm Shell Biomass Using an Overhead Stirrer. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 96: 162-172.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-21

How to Cite

MICROWAVE PLASMA GASIFICATION OF OIL PALM BIOCHAR. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 74(10). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4827