A STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL OF RIVERBANK FILTRATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF COLOR, IRON, TURBIDITY AND E.COLI IN SUNGAI PERAK, KOTA LAMA KIRI, KUALA KANGSAR, PERAK, MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Siti Zahirah Othman School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Nordin Adlan School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Razip Selamat School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4877

Keywords:

Riverbank filtration, turbidity, color, iron, E.coli

Abstract

Riverbank filtration technology in securing water resource is still new to some developing countries such as Malaysia. This research has been carried out at Kota Lama Kiri in the Kuala Kangsar, Perak, Malaysia to study the removal on the turbidity, iron, color, and E.coli by riverbank filtration. Characteristics of soil samples from pumping well (PW) was investigated. The soil samples were collected during the development and construction process of the PW. The water quality analyses were performed on site during the pumping test program. The soil samples collected were transported to the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory, Universiti Sains Malaysia where sieve analyses and permeability test were performed with reference to BS 1377: Part 2:1990. Results of sieve analyses shows that the value of Cu (coefficient of uniformity) for the PW was found to be within the range of 2.40 to 3.75 mm while the value of Cc (coefficient of gradation) lies in the range of 0.06-0.35 mm. The ANOVA One Way Test for soil strata of the PW was performed using MINITAB statistical packages and the results indicate that the p-value was 0.996. It was found that there were no significance differences between the mean size of soil samples from different depths within the PW. The hydraulic conductivity, k value for PW ranges between 0.10-5.65 cm/s. Removal of turbidity, color, iron, and E.coli were 98.78%, 73.56%, and 87.93%, respectively. In this study, the highest removal efficiency of E.coli was found to be 100%.The overall well production from the pumping test was found 112.10 m3/hr.

References

Tufenkji, N., Ryan, J. N. and Elimelech, M. 2002. The Promise of Bank Filtration. Environmental Science and Technology. 36(21): 422A-428A.

Schubert, J. 2002a. Hydraulic Aspects of Riverbank Filtration–Field Studies. Journal of Hydrology. 266: 145-161.

Ray, C., Melin, G., Linsky, R. B. 2002. Riverbank Filtration Improving Source-Water Quality. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Sandhu, C., Grischek, T., Kumar, P. and Ray, C. 2010. Potential for Riverbank Filtration in India. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 1-22 (DOI 10.1007/s10098-010-0298-0).

Ray, C. 2008. Worldwide Potential of Riverbank Filtration. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 10: 223-225.

Sontheimer, H. 1980. J. AWWA. 72(7): 386-390.

Dash, R. R., Mehrotra, I., Kumar, P., Grischek, T. 2008. Lake Bank Filtration at Nainital, India: Water Quality Evaluation. Hydrogeol J. 16(6):1089-1099.

Dillon, P. J., Miller, M., Fallowfield, H., Hutson, J. 2002. The Potential of River Bank Filtration for Drinking Water Supplies in Relation to Microcystin Removal in Brackish Aquifers. JHydrol. 266(3): 209-22.

Wang, J., Smith, J., Dooleym L. 1995. Evaluation of Riverbank Infiltration as a Process for Removing Particles and DBP Precursors. In: Proceedings Water Quality Technology Conf, American Water Works Assoc., Denver, CO.

Massmann, G., Tichomirowa, M., Merz, C., Pekdeger, A. 2003. Sulfide Oxidation and Sulfate Reduction in a Shallow Groundwater System (Oderbruch Aquifer, Germany). J Hydrol. 278(1): 231-243.

Ray, C., Grischek, T., Schubert, J., Wang, J. Z. and Speth, T. F. 2002. A Perspective of Riverbank Filtration. Journal of American Water Works Association (AWWA). 94 (4): 149-160.

Verstraeten, I. M., Thurman, E. M., Lindsey, M. E., Lee, E. C., Smith, R. D. 2002. Changes in Concentrations of Triazine and Acetamide Herbicides by Bank Filtration, Ozonation, and Chlorination in aA Public Water Supply. J Hydrol. 266(3-4):190-208.

Wang, J., Smith, J., Dooley, L. 1995. Evaluation of Riverbank Infiltration as a Process for Removing Particles and DBP Precursors. In: Proceedings Water Quality Technology Conf, American Water Works Assoc., Denver, CO.

Kühn, W., Müller, U. 2000. Riverbank Filtration: An Overview. J AWWA. 92(12): 60-69.

Ray, C., Grischek, T., Hunt, H. 2004. An Introduction to Riverbank Filtration Potential for Drinking Water Production. In: Proceedings ofWorkshop.

Doussan, C., Poitevin, G., Ledoux, E., Detay, M. 1997. River Bank Filtration: Modeling of the Changes in Water Chemistry with Emphasis on Nitrogen Species. J Contam Hydrol. 25(1-2): 129-1561.

Miettinen, I. T., Martikainen, P. J., Vartiainen, T. 1994. Humus Trans-formation at the Bank Filtration Water Plant. Water Sci Technol. 30(10):179-187.

Worch, E., Grischek, T., Börnick, H., Eppinger, P. 2002. Laboratory Tests for Simulating Attenuation Processes of Aromatic Amines In Riverbank Filtration. J Hydrol. 266(3-4): 259-268.

Weiss, W. J., Bouwer, E. J., Ball, W. P., O’Melia, C. R., Arora, H., Speth, T. F. 2003. Riverbank Filtration: Fate of DBP Precursors and Selected Microorganisms. J AWWA. 95(10): 68-81.

Weiss, W. J., Bouwer, E. J., Ball, W. P., O’Melia, C. R., Arora, H., Speth, T. F. 2002. Reduction in Disinfection by Product Precursors and Pathogens During Riverbank Filtration at Three Midwestern United States Drinking-Water Utilities. In: Ray C Et Al (Eds) Riverbank Filtration: Improving Source Water Quality. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 147-174.

Gollnitz, W. D., Clancy, J. L., Whitteberry, B. L., Vogt, J. A. 2003. RBF as a Microbial Treatment Process. J AWWA. 95(12): 56-66.

Tufenkji, N., Ryan, J. N., Elimelech, M. 2002. Bank Filtration. Environ Sci Technol. 36(21): 422A-428A.

Medema, G. J., Juhasz-Holterman, M. H. A., Luijten, J. A. 2000. Removal of Micro-organisms by Bank Filtration in a Gravel-Sand Soil. In: Jülich W, Schubert J (eds) Proceedings Int Riverbank Filtration Conf., International Association of the Rhine Waterworks (IAWR), Amsterdam. 161-168.

Price, M. L., Flugum, J., Jeane, P., Tribbet-Peelen, L. 1999. Sonoma County Finds Groundwater Under Direct Influence of Surface Water Depends on River Conditions. In: Proceedings Int. Riverbank Filtration Conf., National Water Research Institute, Fountain Valley, CA. 25-27.

Havelaar, A. H., van Olphen, M., Schijven, J. F. 1995. Removal and Inactivation of Viruses by Drinking Water Treatment Processes Under Full-Scale Conditions. Water Sci Technol. 31(5-6): 55-62.

Shamrukh, M., Abdel-Wahab, A. 2008. Riverbank Filtration for Sustainable Water Supply: Application to a Large-scale Facility on the Nile River. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 10: 351–358. doi:10.1007/s10098-007-0143-2.

Wang, J., Smith, J., Dooley, L. 1995. Evaluation of Riverbank Infiltration as a Process for Removing Particles and DBP Precursors. In: Proceedings Water Quality Technology Conf, American Water Works Assoc., Denver, CO.

Mikels, M. S. 1992. Characterizing the Influence of Surface Water on Water Produced by Collector Wells. J. AWWA. 84(9): 77-84.

Havelaar, A. H., van Olphen, M., Schijven, J. F. 1995. Removal and Inactivation of Viruses by Drinking Water Treatment Processes Under Full-Scale Conditions. Water Sci Technol. 31(5-6): 55-62.

Schubert, J. 2006. Significance of Hydrologic Aspects on RBF Performance. In:Hubbs, S. (Ed.), Riverbank Filtration Hydrology. 17-41.

Shankar, V., Eckert, P., Ojha, C., König, C. 2009. Transient Three-dimensional Modeling of Riverbank Filtration at Grind Well Field, Germany. Hydrogeology Journal. 17: 321-326.

Hem, J. D. 1985. Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254. 263

Yates, M. V., Gerba, C. P. and Kelley, L. M. 1985. Virus Persistence in Groundwater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 778-781.

Schijven, J. F., Berger, P. and Miettinen, I. 2002. Removal of Pathogens, Surrogates, Indicators, and Toxins Using Riverbank Filtration. In Riverbank Filtration Improving Source–Water Quality (eds Ray, C., Melin, G. and Linsky, R. B.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 73-116.

Aronino, R., Dlugy, C., Arkhangelsky, E., Shandalov, S., Oron, G., Brenner, A. and Gitis, V. 2009. Removal of Viruses from Surface Water and Secondary Effluents by Sand Filtration. Water Res. 43: 87-96.

De Roda Husman, A. M., Lodder, W. J., Rutjes, S. A., Schijven, J. F. and Teunis, P. F. M. 2009. Long-term Inactivation Study of Three Enteroviruses in Artificial Surface And Groundwaters using PCR and Cell Culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 1050-1057.

Torkzaban, S., Hassanizadeh, S., Schijven, J., van den Berg, H. 2006. Role of Air–water Interfaces on the Retention of Viruses Under Unsaturated Conditions. Water Resources Research. 42: 1-11.

Ray, C., Melin, G., Linsky, R. B., 2002a. Riverbank Filtration: Improving Source-water Quality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Fountain Valley, CA, USA. 364. Ray, C., Soong, T. W., Lian, Y. Q., Roadcap, G. 2002b. Effect of Flood-induced Chemical Load on Filtrate Quality at Bank Filtration Sites. Journal of Hydrology. 266: 235-258

Cady, P. 2011. A Riverbank Filtration Demonstration Project on the Kali River. Master’s Thesis. University of Rhode Island, Dandeli, Karnataka, India. 66.

Shamrukh, M. and Abdel-Wahab, A. 2008. Riverbank Filtration for Sustainable Water Supply: Application to a Large-Scale Facility on the Nile River. Clean Technol. Environ Policy. 10: 351-358.

Hiscock, K. M. and Grischek, T. 2002. Attenuation of Groundwater Pollution by Bank Filtration. J. Hydrol. 266: 139-144.

Kuehn, W. and Mueller, U. 2002. Riverbank Filtration: An Overview. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 92: 60-69.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-25

How to Cite

A STUDY ON THE POTENTIAL OF RIVERBANK FILTRATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF COLOR, IRON, TURBIDITY AND E.COLI IN SUNGAI PERAK, KOTA LAMA KIRI, KUALA KANGSAR, PERAK, MALAYSIA. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 74(11). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4877