PENANG USER’S PERCEPTION OF DOMESTIC WATER QUALITY, HEALTH RISK CONCERN AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY: A PILOT STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4878Keywords:
Willingness to pay (WTP), domestic water quality, health concern, Penang, perceptionAbstract
The state of Penang has been known to be offering the lowest water tariff rate for its users in Malaysia. The most recent water services reform exercise in Malaysia saw a suggestion made for the abolishment of water subsidies by the federal government and for full cost recovery (FCR) approach to be applied. This means that the operating cost will be transferred to consumers instead. This study reports a descriptive pilot study results that explored Penang user’s responses to various issues pertaining to their perception of water quality, health risk concern and willingness to pay for increased water tariff. The findings show that users were not that happy with water quality only in terms of taste, suspended solids that should not have come out from the tap but sometimes they do, and chlorine content; however, not for its odor or color. As for health risk concern, although majority believe that their tap water adhered to the drinking standard set by World Health Organization (WHO), still many perceived that their tap water is associated with health risk and unsafe for drinking, which saw many opted to buy bottled water for their drinking consumption. As for willingness to pay, majority think that the tariff should not be increased at all, particularly at the current water quality provided to users. Gender and monthly income as part of demographic factor play important roles in enhancing the study’s outcome. The findings provide preliminary insight to how water users may act towards a possible water tariff increase in the state.
References
National Water Services Commission (SPAN): Laws of Malaysia,Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Air Negara (Act 654) [Online] Available at http://www.span.gov.my/pdf/law/bi/act654_bi_2006.pdf.
National Water Services Commission (SPAN): Laws of Malaysia,Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Air Negara (WSIA/Act 655) [Online] Available at http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%2014/Act%20655.pdf.
Abdul Wahid, N., Ahmad, Z. A., & Arshad, R. 2014. Malaysia Water Services Reform Legislative Issues. Journal of Natural Resources and Development. 4. doi: 10.5027/jnrd.v4i0.09.
SPAN. 2008. SPAN Business Plan 2008-2010. SPAN. 1-21.
Lee, P. O. 2003. The Water Issue Between Singapore and Malaysia : No Solution In Sight? Economics and Finance. 1: 1-40.
Bogale, A., & Urgessa, B. 2012. Households' Willingness to Pay for Improved Rural Water Service Provision: Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Human Ecology. 38(2): 145-154.
Abdul Wahid, N., & Abustan, I. 1998. Water Crisis: A Question of Perceived Value?, Annual Bulletin 1998, institution of Engineers Malaysia Perak branch. 24-26.
Abdul Wahid, N., Abustan, I., Abas, Z., & Arshad, R. 2013. Drinking Water for Public Consumption: The Call for a Socio Economic Cost Analysis. AWER Procedia dvences in Applied Sciences.
Abdul Wahid, N., Ahmad, Z. A., Arshad, R., Cheong, Y. K., & Abustan, I. 2014. Water Services Reform Issues in Malaysia: A Review – The 1st national Conference on Non-Point Source 2014, Vivatel Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, organised by UTM-UNESCO IHP., April, 2014, Vivatel Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chew, K. H. 2014. Factors Influencing Households’ Willingness To Pay For Water In Penang And Perak. Unpublished Master Dissertation. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
Doria, M.F. 2010. Factors Influencing Public Perception of Drinking Water Quality. Water Policy. 12: 1-19.
SPAN. 2012b. Water Rates 2012. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.span.gov.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=529&Itemid=424&lang=en.
Abdul Wahid, N., & Chew, K. H. 2014. Factors Determining Household Consumer’s Willingness to Pay for Water Consumption in Malaysia, Asian Social Science. 11(7): 2015 (in-print).
Breidert, C. 2006. Estimation of Willingness-to-Pay:Theory, Measurement, Application. Germany: Gabler Edition Wissenschaft.
Jiang, Y., Jin, L., & Lin, T. 2010. Higher Water Tariffs for Less River Pollution—Evidence from Min River and Fuzhou City, People’s Republic Of China. Philippines.
Genius, M., Hatzaki, E., Kouromichelaki, E., Kouvakis, G., Nikiforaki, S., & Tsagarakis, K. 2008. Evaluating Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Potable Water Quality and Quantity. Water Resources Management. 22(12): 1825-1834.
Beaumais, O., Briand, A., Millock, K., & Nauges, C. 2010. What are Households Willing to Pay for Better Tap Water Quality. A Cross-Country Valuation Study, Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne.
Behailu, S., Kume, A., & Desalegn, B. 2012. Household's Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Service: A Case Study in Shebedino District, Southern Ethiopia. Water and Environment Journal. 26(3): 429-434.
Cho, Y., Easter, K. W., McCann, L. M. J., & Homans, F. 2005. Are Rural Residents Willing to Pay Enough to Improve Drinking Water Quality? Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 41(3): 729-740.
Prüss, A., Kay, D., Fewtrell, L., & Bartram, J. 2002. Estimating the Burden of Disease from Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene at a Global Level. Environmental Health Perspectives. 110(5): 537-542.
WHO. 2011. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Fourth Edition. Malta: Gutenberg.
Charrois, J. W. 2010. Private Drinking Water Supplies: Challenges for Public Health. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 182(10): 1061-1064.
Jones, A. Q., Dewey, C. E., Dore, K., Majowicz, S. E., McEwen, S. A., David, W. T. Henson, S. J. 2006. Public Perceptions of Drinking Water: A Postal Survey of Residents with Private Water Supplies. 6(94). www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/94.
Dutta, V., & Verma, N. 2009. Water Pricing, Affordability and Public Choice: An Economic Assessment from a Large Indian Metropolis. International Journal of Economics and Finance. 1(2): P238.
Khan, H., Iqbal, F., Saeed, I., & Khan, I. 2010. Estimating Willingness to Pay for Improvements in Drinking Water Quality: Evidence from Peshawar, Northern Pakistan. J. Environ. Econ. 1(2): 38-43.
Wendimu, S., & Bekele, W. 2011. Determinants of Individual Willingness to Pay for Quality Water Supply: The Case of Wonji Shoa Sugar Estate, Ethiopia. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment. 3(15): 474-480.
Olanrewaju, Cecilia, E., Omonona, & Titus, B. 2012. Determinants of Households' Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Supply Service in Kosofe Local Government Area of Lagos State. Continental J. Sustainable Development. 3(3): 20-31.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hertzog, M. A. 2008. Considerations in Determining Sample Size for Pilot Studies. Research in Nursing and Health. 31(2): 180-191.
Julios, S. A. 2005. Sample Size of 12 Per Group Rule of Thumb for a Pilot Study. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 4(4): 287-291.
Van Belle, G. 2002. Statistical Rules of Thumb. New York: Wiley.
Lema, Z., & Beyene, F. 2012. Valuation. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 3(14): 145-159.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
