MATERIALS EVALUATION FOR GEOTHERMAL APPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Ralph Bäßler BAM–Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, D-12200 Berlin/Germany
  • Amela Keserovi BAM–Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, D-12200 Berlin/Germany
  • Joana Sobetzki BAM–Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, D-12200 Berlin/Germany
  • Helmuth Sarmiento Klapper BAM–Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, D-12200 Berlin/Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5164

Keywords:

Localized corrosion, stainless steel, Ni-based alloy, geothermal energy

Abstract

In order to provide basic information on corrosion resistance to the designers and users of geothermal plants different metallic materials including duplex and austenitic stainless steels as well as a nickel alloy have been evaluated in artificial geothermal fluids simulating the conditions in some locations with geothermal potential in Germany as well as two sites in Indonesia. By electrochemical and long-term exposure tests at 100 °C and 150 °C the suitability of low alloyed steel UNS G41300, stainless steels UNS S31603 UNS S31803, UNS S32760, super austenitic steel UNS N08031 and nickel based alloy UNS N06059 was investigated in these geothermal fluids, using critical potentials and corrosion rates. In high-saline environments the crevice corrosion turned out to be the determining mechanism. The nickel based alloy shows excellent corrosion resistance against pitting corrosion. Excluding its high cost, it is very good to be used in the construction of geothermal facilities having highly saline brines. Stainless and duplex steels exhibit a limited corrosion resistance concerning pitting and crevice corrosion. Therefore they are not suitable for highly saline brines. The super austenite UNS N08031 showed a temperature depending behavior. In non-saline environments the low-alloyed steel UNS G41300 (beside of the higher alloyed materials) could be employed as a constructional material for the geothermal power plant, as long as a sufficient wall thickness of the material is considered. 

References

Bäßler, R., Burkert, A., Kirchheiner, R., Saadat, A., Finke, M. 2009. Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance of Materials for Geothermal Applications. NACE International Conference, Corrosion 2009, New Orleans, USA. Paper 09377.

Regenspurg, S., Feldbusch, E., Saadat, A. 2013. Corrosion Processes at the Geothermal Site Groß Schönebeck (North German Basin). NACE International Conference, Corrosion 2013, Orlando, USA. Paper 2606.

Herzberger, P., Münch, W., Kölbel, T., Bruchmann, U., Schlagermann, P., Hötzl, H., Wolf, L., Rettenmaier, D., Steger, H., Zorn, R., Seibt, P., Möllmann, G. U., Sauter, M., Ghergut, Ptak, T. 2010. The Geothermal Power Plant Bruchsal. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010, Bali, Indonesia. Paper 0619.

Mundhenk, N., Huttenloch, P., Scheiber, J., Genter, A., Zorn, R., Kohl, T. 2014. Corrosion and Scaling In The Geothermal Cycle of Soultz-sous-Forêts (France), NACE International Conference, Corrosion 2014, San Antonio, USA. Paper 3897

Sarmiento Klapper, H., Bäßler, R., Saadat, A., Asteman, H. 2011. Evaluation of Suitability of Some High-Alloyed Materials for Geothermal Applications, NACE International Conference, Corrosion 2011, Houston, USA. Paper 11172.

Keserovi, A., Bäßler, R. 2013. Material Evaluation For Application in Geothermal Systems in Indonesia, NACE International Conference, Corrosion 2013, Orlando, USA. Paper 2269

Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN): German Standard DIN 50905/4: Corrosion of Metals; Corrosion Testing; Corrosion Testing in Liquids Under Laboratory Conditions Without Mechanical Stress. 1987.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-18

How to Cite

MATERIALS EVALUATION FOR GEOTHERMAL APPLICATIONS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5164