EFFECT OF FILLER METALS ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF DISSIMILAR WELDING OF STAINLESS STEEL 316L AND CARBON STEEL A516 GR 70

Authors

  • Abdollah Bahador Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Esah Hamzah Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Fauzi Mamat Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5174

Keywords:

Gas tungsten arc welding, mechanical properties, tensile test, micro-hardness test

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation on the effect of using three different filler metals to weld two dissimilar metals namely, stainless steel 316L and low alloy carbon steel A516 gr 70. Manual Gas Tungsten Arc welding (GTAW) with three filler metals including ER 80S-Ni1, ER309L, ER NiCrMo-3 were selected to weld the two metals. Radiography and penetrant tests were performed on the welded metals to ensure the surface and internal soundness of the welds based on the tensile tests results, all the specimens failed at the carbon steel A516 gr 70 base metals with fully ductile fracture mode (cup and cone). Welded samples using Inconel 615 filler metal has the highest strength of 512 MPa while other samples show almost similar strength of 481 and 487 MPa. The tensile strength of all the welded samples is found to be in between the tensile strength of the base metals. Micro-hardness test showed that ER80S-Ni1weld has the highest hardness, meanwhile hardness profile of ER309L presented a sharp drop in the stainless steel side and ER NiCrMo-3 weld metal illustrated hardness above the two base metals with fewer variations across the weld metal.

References

W. Chuaiphan, C. A. Somrerk, S. Niltawach, and B. Sornil. 2012. Dissimilar Welding between AISI 304 Stainless Steel and AISI 1020 Carbon Steel Plates. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 268-270: 283-290.

H. Ki, C. S. Kim, Y. C. Jeon, and S. I. Kwun. 2008. Fatigue Crack Growth Characteristics in Dissimilar Weld Metal Joint. Materials Science Forum. 580-582: 593-596.

P. Kah and M. S. Jukka Martikainen. 2013. Trends in Joining Dissimilar Metals by Welding. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 440: 269-276.

T. Maruyama. 2003. Arc Welding Technology for Dissimilar Joints. Welding International. 17(4): 276-281.

B. A. Soares and W. Reis. 2007. Characterization of the Dissimilar Welding - Austenitic Stainless Steel with Filler Metal of the Nickel Alloy.

M. Marya. 2008. A Brief Review of Challenges & Technologies to Weld Dissimilar Metals in Two Industries: The Upstream Oil & Gas and the Automotive. Materials Science Forum. 580-582: 155-158.

A. M. Shariatpanahi and H. Farhangi. 2009. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Ferritic and Austenitic Steel Joints with an Intermediate Inconel-182 Buttering Layer. Advanced Materials Research. 83-86: 449-456.

M. Sireesha, S. K. Albert, V. Shankar, and S. Sundaresan. 2000. A Comparative Evaluation of Welding Consumables for Dissimilar Welds between 316LN Austenitic Stainless Steel and Alloy 800. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 279(1): 65-76.

H. T. Wang, G. Z. Wang, F. Z. Xuan, C. J. Liu, and S. T. Tu. 2012. Local Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of Alloy52M Dissimilar Metal Welded Joint between A508 Ferritic Steel and 316L Stainless Steel. Advanced Materials Research. 509: 103-110.

S. T. Methods. 1992. Standard Test Methods for Welds. 1-67.

S. T. Methods. 2009. Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products 1. 1-47.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-18

How to Cite

EFFECT OF FILLER METALS ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF DISSIMILAR WELDING OF STAINLESS STEEL 316L AND CARBON STEEL A516 GR 70. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 75(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5174