RADIATION RISK ESTIMATION FROM OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING EXPOSURE IN MALAYSIA

Authors

  • S.R. Yahaya Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mimi H. Hassim Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5191

Keywords:

ionizing radiation, occupational radiation exposure, film badge

Abstract

Ionizing radiation has been increasingly applied in medicine and firmly established as an essential tool for diagnosis. There is high possibility for medical radiation workers to receive doses that are considerably higher than recorded by their dosimeters due to lack of knowledge about ionizing radiation, lack of training in radiation protection, and attitude of the workers themselves toward radiation protection. The purpose of this study is to estimate the radiation risk due to occupational exposure to ionizing radiation among medical diagnostic workers at hospitals in Malaysia. Also the objective is to determine the knowledge of occupational radiation exposure and radiation safety among the workers.  The assessment was made based on the collective doses collected from film badge of the workers. The results of risk assessment show the mean annual collective effective dose based on type of X-ray procedure in this study was 5.445mSv, which is much lower compared to the whole body exposure dose limit, set by the ICRP Publication 60. A survey on knowledge of occupational radiation exposure and radiation safety was conducted using questionnaire and it was found that vast majority of respondents were aware of radiation safety with 91.3% answered the specific questions regarding radiation protection at workplace correctly. Unfortunately only 30.4% of the respondents fully understand the hazard they are exposed to. The study reveals that there is a critical need to educate not only medical radiation workers but also medical doctors and nurses to decrease unnecessary occupational exposure to radiation hazard.

References

Frankel R. 1976. Radiation Protection for Radiologic Technlogists. McGraw Hill Publication, United States of America. 9: 101-115.

UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientifix Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Report Scientifix Annex. Hereditary Effects of Radiation.UNSCEAR Publications.Part V. (2001).45-51.

Ng KH. 1999. Medical radiation exposures for diagnostic radiology in Malaysia. PubMed. Journal. 33-36.

Shinji Yoshinaga, Kiyohiko Mabuchi, Alice J. Sigurdson, Michele Morin Doody, Elaine Ron. 2004. Cancer Risks Among Radiologists and Radiologic Technologists: Review of Epidemiologic Studies. Radiology Journal. 2:313-316.

UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientifix Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Report Scientifix Annex. Biological Mechanisms of Radiation Actions at Low Doses.UNSCEAR Publications.Annexes G. Report U5 (2001).21-27.

Folkerts KH, Munz A and Jung S. 1997.Estimation of radiation exposure and radiation risk for employees of a heart catheterization laboratory.Zeitschrift for Kadiologie. 86 (4), 258-263.

E. Kiguli-Malwadde, P. DdunguMatovu, M.G. Kawooya and R.K. Byanyima. 2006. Radiation safety awareness among radiation workers and clientele at Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. East and Central African Journal of Surgery. 11(1), 49-51.

Abdul Saeed Shah, Naseem Begum, Shahida Nasreen and Ayub Khan. 2007. Assessment of Radiation Protection Awareness Levels in Medical Radiation Science Technologists – A Pilot Survey. Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan. JPMI. 3:169-172.

Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia. The Report on Medical Radiation Exposure Study in Malaysia. 2009. Chapter 2: Diagnostic, Interventional and Dental Radiology. 1:12-36.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) .1971. Radiation quantities and units. ICRU Report 19 (Bethesda, MD: ICRU).

Ismail Bahari and Mohd.YusofMohd. Ali. 2007. Managing Radiation Safety: Guide for Radiation Protection Officers. McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Publication. 7:1-33.

ICRP (1991). 1990. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3).

Klein LW, Miller Dl, Balten S. et. al. 2009. Occupational Health Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory: Time for a Safer Environment. Radiology Journal. 250(2):538-544.

M. M. Rehani. 2012. ICRP and IAEA actions on radiation protection in computed tomography. Radiation Dosimetry. 1-6.

ICRP (International Commission of Radiological Protection.) 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103; ICRP. 37:2-4.

United Nation Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiations (UNSCEAR). 2000. Sources And Effects Of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly of the United Nations with Scientific Annex D; Medical Radiation Exposures. 295.

Leo Egghe and LoetLeydesdorff. 2006.The relation between Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and Salton’s cosine measure.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.1617-1621.

Malaysia. 1984. Atomic Energy Licensing Act.Act 304.

Malaysia. 2010. Atomic Energy Licensing (Basic Safety Radiation Protection) Regulation. P.U (A) 46.

Daniel Admassie, SeifiTeferi and KalkidanHailegenaw. 2010. Collective radiation dose from diagnostic x-ray examination in nine public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 24(2), 140-144.

De Gonzalez A, Darby S. 2004. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimated for the UK and 14 other countries. The Lancet. 363(9406), 345-351.

P. C. Shrimpton, B. F. Wall and D. Hart. 1999. Diagnostic medical exposures in the UK. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 50: 261-269.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-17

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

RADIATION RISK ESTIMATION FROM OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING EXPOSURE IN MALAYSIA. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 75(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5191