EFFECTS OF OBSTACLES ON PREMIXED HYDROGEN-AIR MIXTURES EXPLOSION IN CLOSED PIPE

Authors

  • S.Z. Sulaiman Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • R.M. Kasmani Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • A. Mustafa Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5194

Keywords:

Bending, closed pipe, hydrogen concentration, pressure, retonation

Abstract

Results of experiments on explosion premixed hydrogen-air are presented. The data covers a wide range of hydrogen concentration between 13 to 54 % v/v (Ф= 0.4 to 1.8). The experimental work was performed in a closed pipe containing 90 degree bends with a volume of 0.42 m3operating at ambient conditions. This study was carried out to determine the severity of hydrogen explosion in a closed pipe with length over diameter (L/D) ratio of 51. The results indicate that the worst case accident for hydrogen-air mixture occur at concentration slightly above stoichiometric (Ф 1.2) or 36% v/v. It is also found that pressure downstream the bending region experienced an increase of about 2 times, compared to pressure at the bend. It can be said that a strong backflow or retonation reflecting from the end pipe wall influentthe maximum overpressure downstreamof the bend and this phenomenon was highlighted.

References

H. Phylaktou, M.Foley, and G. E.Andrews. 1993. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 6: 21-29

K. Chatrathi, J. E.Going, and B,Grandestaff. 2001. Process Safety Progress. 20: 286-294

R. Blanchard, D. Arndt, R. Grätz, M. Poli, and S. Scheider. 2010. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 23: 253-259

S. D. Emami, M. Rajabi, C. R. Che Hassan, M. D. A. Hamid, R. M. Kasmani, and M. Mazangi. 2013. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 38: 14115-14120

M. A. Liberman, M. F. Ivanov, A. D. Kiverin, M. S. Kuznetsov, A. A. Chukalovsky, and T. V. Rakhimova. 2010. Acta Astronautica. 67: 688-701

R. Blanchard, D.Arndt, R.Grätz, and S.Scheider. 2011. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 24: 194-199

C. Wang, W.Han, J.Ning, and Y.Yang. 2012. Safety Science. 50: 709-717

K. S. Raman, 1998. Graduate aeronautical laboratories,California Institute of Technology. Pasadena

Y-D. Jo, and D. A.Crowl. 2010. Process Safety Progress. 29: 216-223

S. H. Kang, S. W. Baek, and H. G. Im. 2006. Combustion Theory and Modelling.10: 659-681

R. Sankaran, and H. G.Im. 2006. Combustion Science and Technology. 178: 1585-1611

H. Phylaktou, and G. E.Andrews. 1991. Combustion and Flame. 85: 363-37

M.H. Mat Kiah, 2013. Master Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

G.Munday, 1970, The Chemical Engineer. 248:135-

Downloads

Published

2015-08-17

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

EFFECTS OF OBSTACLES ON PREMIXED HYDROGEN-AIR MIXTURES EXPLOSION IN CLOSED PIPE. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 75(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5194