APPLICATION OF RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY

Authors

  • N.E. Hussin Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • K. Kidam Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Jihan J. Jalani Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • A. Johari Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • H. Hashim Process System Engineering Centre (PROSPECT), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mimi H. Hassim Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5199

Keywords:

Accident contributor, risk reduction strategies, hierarchy of controls.

Abstract

Recent accident analyses show that the accident rates in the chemical process industry (CPI) were still not decreasing. In the paper, the issues and challenges of risk reduction strategies were discussed. A case study using accident cases, extracted from the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) database was conducted. The results of the accident analysis were discussed and then compared to previous analysis of the Failure Knowledge Database (FKD, Japan). The CSB analysis shows that the industry had moved from procedural risk reduction strategies to inherently safer and add-on engineered strategies. After 10years improvement, the industry was approaching towards more balanced safety management to prevent occurrence and recurrence of accidents with the emphasis on both management and engineering risk reduction strategies. 

 

References

He G, Zhang L, Lu Y, Mol APJ. 2011. Managing major chemical accidents in China: Towards effective risk information. J Hazard Mater. 187(1-3): 17-81.

Prem KP, Ng D, Mannan MS. 2010. Harnessing database resources for understanding the profile of chemical process safety incidents. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 23(4): 549-60.

Pasman HJ. Will a safe process be sufficient or do we have to do a bit more? In: Proceeding of 13thInt Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries 2010; Bruges; 2010. June 6-9.1: 17-21.

Hendershot DC. 2011. Inherently safer design: An overview of key elements. Professional Saf J. The American Society of Safety Engineers’

Taylor JR. 2007. Statistics of design error in the process industries. J SafSci. 45(1): 61-73.

Mannan MS, Prem KP, Ng D. 2010. Challenges and needs for process safety in the new millennium. In: 13thInt Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries 2010; Bruges;. June 6-9.1: 5-13.

Knegtering B, Pasman HJ. 2009. Safety of the process industries in the 21st century: A changing need for process safety management for a changing industry. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 22: 162-8.

Antaki G. 2005. Fitness-For-Service And Integrity Of Piping, Vessels And Tanks. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Santamaria Ramiro JM, BranaAisa PA. 1998. Risk Analysis And Reduction In Chemical Process Industry. Blackei Academic & Profession, Thomson Science;

Markowski AS, Sam Mannan M. 2010. ExSys-LOPA for the chemical process industry. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 23: 688-96.

CCPS. 1998. Guidelines For Design Solutions For Process Equipment Failures. Center for Chemical Process Safety, AICheE.

Amyotte PR, Pegg MJ, Khan FI, Nifuku M, Tan Y. 2007. Moderation of dust explosions. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 20(4-6): 675-87.

Hendershot D.A. 2010. Summary of inherently safer technology. Process Saf Progress. 29(4) 389-92.

Khan FI, Abbasi SA. 1999. Major accident in process industries and analysis of causes and consequences. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 12: 361-78.

Kidam K, Hurme M, Hassim MH. 2010. In: Proceeding of 13thInt Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries 2010. Bruges. June 6-9 .2: 447-450.

Srinivasan R, Natarajan S. 2012. Developments in inherently safety: A review of the progress during 2001-2011 and opportunities ahead. J Process Saf & Env Protect. 90(5): 384-403.

Kidam K. 2012. Process Safety Enhancement In Chemical Plant Design By Exploiting Accident Knowledge. PhD thesis. Aalto University School of Chemical Technology

CSB. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board; 2013.www. csb.gov/investigations/completed-investigations

Reniers G, Amyotte P. 2012. Prevention in the chemical and process industries: Future directions. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 25: 227-31.

CCPS. 2007. Guidelines For Risk Based Process Safety. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Wiley

Kletz TA. 2009. Accident reports may not tell us everything we need to know. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 22(2): 162-8.

Rollenhagen C. 2010. Can focus on safety culture become an excuse for not rethinking design of technology? J SafSci. 48(2): 268-78.

Amyotte PR, 2011. MacDonald DK, Khan FI. An analysis of CSB investigation reports concerning the hierarchy of controls. J Process Saf Progress. 30(3):261–5.

Howard J. 2008. Prevention through design – Introduction. J Saf Research. 39:113.

Manuele FA. 2008. Prevention through design (PtD): History and future. J Saf Research. 39:127-30.

Kidam K, Hurme M. 2012. Origin of equipment design and operation errors. J Loss Prevent Process Ind. 25:937-49.

Korvers PMW, Sonnemans PJM. 2008. Accidents: A discrepancy between indicators and facts! J SafSci 46: 1067-77.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-17

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

APPLICATION OF RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRY. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5199