SUSPENSION OPTIMIZATION USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE) METHOD ON MSC/ADAMS-INSIGHT

Authors

  • N. Ikhsan Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, UiTM Shah Alam, 40450 Shah Alam , Selangor
  • R. Ramli Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur
  • A. Alias R&D Department, Perusahaan Otomobil National (PROTON)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5211

Keywords:

Suspension modelling, MSC/ADAMS Insight, design of experiment (DoE), Pareto chart

Abstract

In this paper, the optimum setting for suspension hard points was determined from a half vehicle suspension system. These optimized values were obtained by considering the Kinematic and Compliance (K&C) effects of a verified PROTON WRM 44 P0-34 suspension model developed using MSC/ADAMS/CAR. For optimization process, multi body dynamic software, MSC/ADAMS/INSIGHT and Design of Experiment (DoE) method was employed. There were total of 60 hard points (factors) in x, y and z axis-direction for both front and rear suspension while toe, camber and caster change were selected as the objective function (responses) to be minimized. The values of 5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm were used as relative values of factor setting to determine the factor range during optimization process. The hard point axis-direction that has the most effects on the responses was identified using the Pareto chart to optimize while the rests were eliminated. As expected result, a new set of suspension system model with a selected of Kinematic and Compliance (K&C) data set were obtained, and compared with the verified simulation data when subjected to the vertical parallel movement simulation test to determine the best setting and optimum suspension hard points configuration.  

References

Pathmasharma, S., Suresh, J. K., Viswanathan, P. and R.Subramanian, R. 2013. Analysis of Passenger Car Suspension System Using Adams. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research. 5(2): 2278 – 798

Colombo, D., Gobbi, M., Mastinu, G. and Pennati, M. 2009. Analysis of an unusual McPherson suspension failure, Engineering Failure Analysis 16: 1000–1010

Ikhsan, N., Ramli, R. and Alias, A. 2014. Analysis of kinematic and compliance of passive suspension system using adams car, Proceeding. International Conference On Automotive Innovation And Green Energy Vehicle (AIGEV). 25-27th August 2014.

Daniel A. M_antaras, Pablo Luque and Carlos Vera. 2004. Development and validation of a three-dimensional kinematic model for the McPherson steering and suspension mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory 39: 603–619

Reimpell, J. and Stoll, H. 1998. The Automotive Chassis: Engineering Principles, Ed. Arnold, London,

Uys, P. E., Els, P. S. and Thoresson, M. 2007. Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds. Journal of Terramechanics 44: 163–175.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-20

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

SUSPENSION OPTIMIZATION USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE) METHOD ON MSC/ADAMS-INSIGHT. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(8). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5211