A SURVEY ON THE PERFORMANCE-RISK RATING INDEX FOR BUILDING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION BUILDINGS

Authors

  • Natasha Khalil Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak, Malaysia
  • Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman Department of Building Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Rizal Baharum Department of Building Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5230

Keywords:

Building performance evaluation, performance indicator, health and safety risk, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), rating index

Abstract

Higher education institutions (HEI) buildings are considered as key functional, as it generates environment, human and economic resources. The growing population of students in HEI is increasing year byyear; therefore, it is important to optimize the building performance by conducting a properperformance assessment tool. Inevitably, growing students’ population with various learning activities has constituted risk emergence, green issues, inefficient of energy use and climate discomfort. However, concerns on the prevalence of risk towards occupants are still deficient in assessing buildingperformance. This paper presents the result of rating index for a construct of performance criteria, namely Building Performance-Risk Indicators (PRI). Questionnaire survey involving Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to generate the weightings for each indicator. There were 12 experts from the leading facilities management (FM) industry involved in the survey and rating process. The experts’ subjective weightings of the different attributes are extorted using the AHP computer software Expert Choice 11.

References

A. Gillen, A. Wright, and L. Spink. 2011. Student Perceptions of a Positive Climate for Learning: A Case Study. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 27(1): 65-82.

H. Altan. 2010. Energy Efficiency Interventions in UK Higher Education Institutions. Energy Policy. 38(12): 7722-7731.

M. Sapri and S. Muhammad. 2010. Monitoring energy performance in higher education buildings for sustainable caumpus. Malaysian J. Real Estate. 5(1): 1-25.

M. A. Hassanain. 2007. Post-Occupancy Indoor Environmental Quality Evaluation of Student Housing Facilities. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 3(4): 249-256.

A. L. Olanrewaju, M. F. Khamidi, and A. Idrus. 2010. Quantitative analysis of defects in Malaysian university buildings: Providers. J. Retail Leis. Prop. 9(2): 137-149.

D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry. 1999. Building Performance Evaluation In Higher Education Properties: Towards A Process Model. In COBRA 1999.

N. Almeida, V. Sousa, L. Alves Dias, and F. Branco. 2010. A Framework for Combining Risk-management and Performance-Based Building Approaches. Build. Res. Inf. 38(2): 157-174.

R. J. Cole. 2000. Building Environmental Assessment Methods : Assessing Construction Practices. Constr. Manag. Econ. 18(8): 949-957.

T. Lützkendorf and D. Lorenz. 2007. Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation. Build. Res. Inf. 35(6): 644-661.

T. Lützkendorf and D. P. Lorenz. 2006. Using an Integrated Performance Approachi Building Assessment Tools. Build. Res. Inf. 34(4): 334-356.

B. J. Meacham. 2010. Risk-informed Performance-based Approach to Building Regulation. J. Risk Res. 13(7): 877-893.

A. Wolski, N. A. Dembsey, and B. J. Meacham. 2000. Accommodating Perceptions of Risk in Performance-based Building ‘Re-Safety’ Code Development. Fire Saf. J. 34: 297–309.

A. Zalejska-Jonsson. 2012. Evaluation of Low-energy and Conventional Residential Buildings from Occupants’ Perspective. Build. Environ. 58: 135-144.

B. P. Thompson and L. C. Bank. 2007. Risk Perception in Performance-Based Building Design and Applications to Terrorism-Resistant Design. 61-69.

D. Pati, C.-S. Park, and G. Augenbroe. 2006. Roles of Building Performance Assessment in Stakeholder Dialogue in AEC. Autom. Constr. 15: 415-427.

R. J. Cole. 1998. Emerging Trends in Building Environmental Assessment Methods. Build. Res. Inf. 26(1): 3-16.

J. Douglas. 1996. Building Performance and Its Relevance to Facilities Management. Facilities. 14(April): 23-32.

B. William. 1993. What is Performance? Perform. Manag. 11(3): 190-91.

D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry. 2003. A Conceptual Framework to Measure Facilities Management Performance. Prop. Manag. 21(2): 171-189.

N. Khalil. 2008. Performance Analysis Of Government and Public Buildings Via Post Occupancy Evaluation (Unpublished Master Thesis). Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Malaysia.

J. E. Woods. 2008. Expanding the Principles of Performance to Sustainable Buildings. Real Estate Issues. 33(3): 37-46.

B. Meacham, R. Bowen, J. Traw, and A. Moore. 2005. Performance-based Building Regulation: Current Situation and Future Needs. Build. Res. Inf. 33(2): 91-106.

R. Spence. 2004. Risk and Regulation: Can Improved Government Action Reduce the Impacts of Natural Disasters? Build. Res. Inf. 32(5): 391-402.

E. Meins, H. Wallbaum, R. Hardziewski, and A. Feige. 2010. Sustainability and Property Valuation: A Risk-based Approach. Build. Res. Inf. 38(3): 280-300.

B. Edwards. 2000. University Architecture. Spon Press (Taylor & Francis Group), UK.

T. Malmqvist and M. Glaumann. 2009. Environmental Efficiency in Residential Buildings – A Simplified Communication Approach. Build. Environ. 44(5): 937-947.

H. H. Ali and S. F. Al. 2008. Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan. Build. Environ. 1-12.

M. Camilleri, R. Jaques, and N. Isaacs. 2001. Impacts of Climate Change on Building Performance in New Zealand. Build. Res. Inf. 29(6): 440-450.

R. N. Whitfield. 2003. Managing Institutional Risks – A Framework. University of Pennsylvania.

E. Taylor-Powell. 2002. Quick Tips Collecting Group Data: Delphi Technique. The Board of Regents, Universitiy of Wisonsin System, [Online]. Available: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/ pdande/.

Y. Yau. 2006. The Safety Performance of Apartment Buildings: Empirical Evidence from Hong Kong [PhD Thesis]. The University of Hong Kong.

D. C.-W. Ho, K.-W. Chau, A. King-Chung Cheung, Y. Yau, S.-K. Wong, H.-F. Leung, S. Siu-Yu Lau, and W.-S. Wong. 2008. A Survey of the Health and Safety Conditions of Apartment Buildings in Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 43(5): 764-775.

T. L. Saaty. 2008. Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1): 83-98.

T. L. Saaty. 1990. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48: 9-26.

M. Alexander. 2012. Decision-Making using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and SAS / IML ®. In SESUG 2012. 1-12.

K. Bunruamkaew. 2012. How to do AHP analysis in Excel The Analytical Hierarchy Process – AHP.

Z. Chen, D. Clements-croome, J. Hong, H. Li, and Q. Xu. 2006. A Multicriteria Lifespan Energy Efficiency Approach to Intelligent Building Assessment. Energy Build. 38: 393-409.

C. a Poveda and M. Lipsett. 2011. A Review of Sustainability Assessment and Sustainability/Environmental Rating Systems and Credit Weighting Tools. J. Sustain. Dev. 4(6): 36-55.

T. Hsieh, S. Lu, and G.-H. Tzeng. 2004. Project Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Planning and Design Tenders Selection in Public Office Buildings. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 22: 573-584.

I. N. Pujawan and L. H. Geraldin. 2009. House of Risk: A Model for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management. Bus. Process Manag. J.. 15(6): 953-967.

W. Preiser, H. Rabinowits, and E. White. 1988. Post Occupancy Evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company CRS Sirrine Houston, TX.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-20

How to Cite

Khalil, N., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Baharum, M. R. (2015). A SURVEY ON THE PERFORMANCE-RISK RATING INDEX FOR BUILDING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION BUILDINGS. Jurnal Teknologi, 75(9). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5230