EFFECT OF ALIGNMENT ON THE QUALITY OF BENDER ELEMENT PROCEDURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5436Keywords:
Bender element, procedure limitations, alignment, arrival time, cross-correlationAbstract
One of the main geophysical tools (seismic tools) in the laboratory is the bender element. This tool can be used to measure some dynamic soil properties (e.g. shear and Young’s modulus). However, even if it relatively simple to use the bender element, inconsistent testing procedures can cause poor quality in the bender element data. One of the bender element procedure that always neglected is the alignment (different positions of bender element receiver to the transmitter in the vertical axis). The alignment effect was evaluated via changing the horizontal distance between transmitter and receiver starting from 0 to 110 mm for two sizes of the sample's thickness (i.e. 63.17 mm and 91.51 mm). Five methods were applied to calculate the travel times. Those methods were as the following: visually, first-peak, maximum-peak, CCexcel and CCGDS. In general, the experiments indicated uncertain results for both of the P-wave (primary wave) and S-wave (secondary wave) velocities at zone of Dr:D above 0.5:1 (where Dr is the horizontal distance of the receiver from the vertical axis and D is the thickness of the sample). On the other hand, both the visual and first-peak methods show the wave velocities results are higher than obtained from other methods. However, the ratio between the amplitude of transmitter signals to receiver amplitude signal was taken to calculate the damping-slope of the P-wave and S-wave. Thus the results from damping slope show steeply slope when the ratio of Dr:D is above 0.5:1 compare with gentle slope below ratio 0.5:1 at the sample with thickness equal to 91.51 mm, while there is no variation at a slope in sample with thickness equal to 63.17 mm.
References
Leong, E. C., Cahyadi, J. and Rahardjo, H., 2009.Measuring Shear and Compression Wave Velocities of Soil Using Bender–Extender Elements. Can. Geotech. J. 46: 792–812.
Rio, J. F. M. E. 2006. Advances in Laboratory Geophysics Using Bender Elements. Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Jong-Sub Lee and J. Carlos Santamarina. 2005. Bender Elements: Performance and Signal Interpretation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 131(9). September 1, 2005. ©ASCE, ISSN 1090 0241/2005/9-1063–1070.
Christophe, D. Hocine, H. and Pierre-Yves, H. 2003. Characterization of Loire River Sand inthe Small Strain Domain Using New Bender-Extender Elements. 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, July 16-18, 2003, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Arulnathan, R., Boulanger, R. W., Kutter, B. L., and Sluis, W. K. 2000. New Tool for Shear Wave Velocity Measurements in Model Tests. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal. 23(4): 444-453.
Jovicic, V., Coop. M. R. and Simic, M. 1996. Objective Criteria for Determining Gmax from Bender Element Tests, Technical Note. Geotechnique. 46(2): 357-362.
Brignoli, E. G. M., Gotti, M., and Stokoe, K. H. 1996. Measurement of Shear Waves in Laboratory Specimens By Means Of Piezoelectric Transducers. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal. 19(4): 384-397.
Viggiani, G. and Atkinson, J. H. 1995a. Interpretation of Bender Element Tests, Technical Note. Geotechnique 45(1): 149-154.
Viggiani G. and Atkinson, J. H. 1995b. Stiffness of Fine-Grained Soil at Very Small Strains. Geotechnique. 45(2): 249-265.
Clayton, C. R. I., Theron, M., and Best, A. I. 2004. The Measurement of Vertical Shear-Wave Velocity using Side-Mounted Bender Elements in the Triaxial Apparatus. Géotechnique. 54(7): 495-498.
Germano, C., 2003. Flexure Mode Piezoelectric Transducers. Audio and Electroacoustics. IEEE Transactions. 19(1):6.
Lawrence, F. V., 1965. Ultrasonic Shear Wave Velocity in Sand and Clay. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. Research Report R65–05.
Lings, M. L. and Greening, P. D. 2001. A Novel Bender/Extender Element for Soil Testing, Technical Note. Geotechnique 51(8): 713-717.
Leong, E. C., Yeo, S.H., and Rahardjo, H. 2005. Measuring Shear Wave Velocity Using Bender Elements. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 28(5): 488–498.
Alramahi, B. 2007. Characterization Of Unsaturated Soils Using Elastic And Electromagnetic Waves. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University.
Sa´nchez-Salinero, I., Roesset, J. M. and Stokoe, K.H. 1986. Analytical Studies of Body Wave Propagation and Attenuation, Geotechnical Engineering Report No GR86–15. Civil Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin. 272 pages.
Knox, D. P.; Stokoe, K. H. and Kopperman, S. E., 1982. Effect of State of Stress on Velocity of Low Amplitude Shear Wave Propagating Along Principal Stress Directions in Dry Sand. Geotechnical Engineering Research Report GR 82-23. University of Texas at Austin.
Yamashita, S., Kawaguchi, T., Nakata, Y., MIKAML, T., Fujiwara, T., and Shibuya, S. 2009. Interpretation of International Parallel Test on the Measurement of Gmax Using Bender Elements. Soils and foundations. 49(4): 631-650.
Arulnathan, R., Boulanger, R.W., and Riemer, M.F., 1998. Analysis of Bender Element Tests," Geotechnical Testing Journal. 21(2): 120-13.
Zarar, M.M.J. Personal Communication. Center of Electromagnetic Compatibility EMC, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia UTHM. Johor, Malaysia. April 10, 2014.
Rees, S., Le Compte, A., and Snelling, K. 2013. A New Tool for the Automated Travel Time Analyses of Bender Element Tests. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013.
Yang, J., and Gu, X. Q. 2013. Shear Stiffness of Granular Material at Small Strains: Does It Depend on Grain Size?. Géotechnique, 63(2): 165-179.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
