NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE BALLISTIC LIMIT IN THE HYDRODYNAMIC RAM

Authors

  • M. R. Aziz Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, UiTM Penang, 13500 Permatang Pauh, Penang, Malaysia
  • W. Kuntjoro Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, UiTM Shah Alam, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • N. V. David Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, UiTM Shah Alam, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5622

Keywords:

Ballistic limit (BL), hydrodynamic ram (HRAM), fragment simulating projectile (FSP), smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH)

Abstract

This paper presents the ballistic limit study for the water-filled aluminum tank. The objective was to determine the ballistic limit for the rear tank wall by using numerical method. Commercial software Altair Hyperworks 12.0 was employed for this study. The finite element coupled with smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) was developed to model the perforation of fragment simulating projectile (FSP) towards water-filled tank. Verification of the results was done by comparing with the experiment results. The results showed that there were four main phase failures occurred, which were shock phase, drag phase, cavitation phase and exit phase. The ballistic limit for the rear wall was 479.27 m/s.

References

Ercan Sevkat. 2012. Experimental and Numerical Approaches for Estimating Ballistic Limit Velocities of Woven Composite Beams. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 45: 16-27.

Deng Yunfei, Zhang Wei, Yang Yonggang, Shi Lizhong & Wei Gang. 2014. Experimental Investigation on the Ballistic Performance of Double Layered Plates Subjected to Impact by Projectile of High Strength. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 70: 38-49.

Deng Yunfei, Zhang Wei, Yang Yonggang, Shi Lizhong & Wei Gang. 2014. The Ballistic Performance of Metal Plates Subjected to Impact by Projectiles of Different Strength. Materials and Design. 58: 305-315.

Aziz, M. R., Kuntjoro, W., David, N.V. & Rais, F. 2013. An Experimental Study on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of Non-filled Tank against Fragment Simulating Projectile (FSP). Applied Mechanics and Materials. 393: 409-414.

Aziz, M. R., Kuntjoro, W., David, N.V. & R. Ahmad, 2013. Ballistic Resistance Analysis of Non-filled Tank against Fragment Simulating Projectile (FSP). Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 10(2): 79-95.

Aziz, M. R., Kuntjoro, W. & David, N.V. 2015. Ballistic Limit of Non-filled Aluminium Tank: Experimental and Numerical Study. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering. 2(1).

Varas, D., Zaera, R. & Lo´pez-Puente, J. 2009. Numerical Modelling of the Hydrodynamic Ram Phenomenon. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 36: 363-374.

Varas, D., Zaera, R. & Lo´pez-Puente, J. 2012. Numerical Modelling of Partially Filled Aircraft Fuel Tanks Submitted to Hydrodynamic Ram. Aerospace Science and Technology. 16(1): 19-28.

Peter J. Disimile, John Davis, Norman Toy. 2011. Mitigation of Shock Waves Within a Liquid Filled Tank. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 38: 61-72.

Yongqiang Chen, Sivakumar Kulasegaram. 2009. Numerical Modelling of Fracture of Particulate Composites Using SPH Method. Computational Materials Science. 47: 60-70.

Marco Anghileri, Luigi-Maria L. Castelletti, Edoardo Francesconi, Andrea Milanese, Michele Pittofrati. 2011. Rigid Body Water Impacteexperimental Tests and Numerical Simulations Using the SPH Method. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 38: 141-151.

Aziz, M. R., Kuntjoro, W. & David, N. V. 2014. Ballistic Limit of Aluminium Tank: An Experimental Study. Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering. 222-226.

An American National Standard. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Designation: E8/E8M–11. [Online]. From: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials1 [Acessed on 26 June 2015].

MIL-P-46593A (ORD). 1962.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-27

How to Cite

NUMERICAL MODELING OF THE BALLISTIC LIMIT IN THE HYDRODYNAMIC RAM. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 76(8). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5622