EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TYPE OF GLOVE USING VIBRATING HAND TOOL

Authors

  • Nurul Hanna Mas’aud Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Bulan Abdullah Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5667

Keywords:

Ergonomic, vibrating hand tool, vibration exposure, anti-vibration glove, industrial workers

Abstract

The paper presents satisfaction survey of the glove conditions while using vibrating hand tool in a manufacturing industry. The effects of vibration can cause health issues to the workers especially to those who are using vibrating hand tools. Hand held vibrating tools have become the common use in the manufacturing area. A study stated that many researchers have found that vibration exposures have become a common health problem in manufacturing industries. The research scope and objectives are to evaluate the satisfaction level of the workers using different types of gloves as well as to see how effective they are at reducing vibration exposure. The input data were collected by satisfaction survey among 30 respondents. There are three types of gloves conditions; (i) without glove, (ii) knitted glove and (iii) fingerless anti-vibration glove. The comparison of worker’s satisfaction level between these three conditions was summarized. It clearly showed that the use of fingerless anti-vibration glove is the most comfortable among the workers. The main advantage is that the fingers and thumb remain uncovered resulting in unconstructed movements.

References

Forsman, M., Cyrén, H., Möller, T., Kadefors, R., and Mathiassen, S. E. 2002. Activity in Five Muscles during Joint Securing Using Pneumatic Nutrunners. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 29(1): 21-32.

Nurul Hanna Mas’aud and Ismail N. Ahmad. 2011. Issues and Countermeasures of Hand Tool Vibration in Manufacturing Plants. Asia Pacific Symposium on Advancements in Ergonomics and Safety (ERGOSYM2011) 5-6 December 2011, Perlis, Malaysia.

Hazani Shafie, M. R. N., Tan C. F., and Raihani M. K. 2005. A Study of the Relation Between Engineering Curriculums and Industrial Accidents. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kolej Universiti Teknikal Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Schulze, L. J. H., Congleton, J. J., Koppa, R. J., and Huchingson, R. D. 1995. Effects of Pneumatic Screwdrivers and Workstations on Inexperienced and Experienced Operator Performance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 16(3): 175-189.

Mirta Widia, S. Z. D. 2010. Investigation on Upperlimb Muscle Activity and Grip Strength During Drilling Task. Paper presented at the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2010, IMECS 2010, Hong Kong.

Dawal, S. Z., Soin, N., Ali, N., Mahadi, W. N. W., Ismail, Z., & Aziz, S. A. 2008. Assessment of Biceps Brachii and Upper Trapezius Muscle Fatigue using EMG Measurements.

Ko, Y. H., Ean, O. L., & Ripin, Z. M. 2011. The Design and Development of Suspended Handles for Reducing Hand-Arm Vibration in Petrol Driven Grass Trimmer. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 41(5): 459-470.

Dong, R. G., McDowell, T. W., Welcome, D. E., Warren, C., Wu, J. Z., and Rakheja, S. 2009. Analysis of Anti-Vibration Gloves Mechanism and Evaluation Methods. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 321(1-2): 435-453.

Andrew Forbes. 2013. Evaluation of Anti-Vibration Gloves in a Manufacturing Setting.

Smith, D. W. 2009. Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS): Extension Safety Program.

ACGIH. 2010. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Signature Publications.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-29

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TYPE OF GLOVE USING VIBRATING HAND TOOL. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 76(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5667