STANDARDIZED WORK IN TPS PRODUCTION LINE

Authors

  • Nurul Hayati Abdul Halim Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Ahmed Jaffar Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Noriah Yusof Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Roseelena Jaafar Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Naufal Adnan Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Noor Azlina Mohd Salleh Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nur Nida Azira Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5681

Keywords:

Standardized work, Toyota production system, automotive production line, Kaizen

Abstract

This paper presents a case study implementation of one of the Toyota Production System (TPS) tools, known as Standardized Work (SW), in an automotive assembly line in Malaysia. The main functions of SW are to design, develop, document and visualize a set of a manufacturing process with detail and proper study of it. SW is conducted to raise production consistency and quality of a produced product and the job performed. With the proper SW implementation, good results have been obtained from the increase in efficiency, productivity, quality and process stability of the operator’s performance. Thus, the findings are consistent with TPS philosophies which are waste elimination and continuous improvement in any manufacturing area.

References

Jaffar, A., Halim, N. H. A. and Yusoff, N. 2012. Effective Data Collection And Analysis For Efficient Implement Of Standardized Work (SW). J. of Mechanical Engineering. 9: 45-78.

Kasul, R. A. and Motwani J. G. 1997. Successful Implementation Of TPS In A Manufacturing Setting: A Case Study. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 97(7): 274-279.

Hazier, J. and Render, B. 2006, Operations Management, Pearson International Edition, Eight Editions: 13-15: 403-406.

Lawrence, S. A. 1992. Second Edition, Productivity Measurement And Improvement, Prentice Hall Inc: 9-20.

Halim, N. H. A., Jaffar, A., Yusoff, N. and Adnan, A. N. 2012. Gravity Flow Rack's Material Handling System for Just-In-Time (JIT) Production. Procedia Engineering. 41: 1714-1720.

Halim, N. H. A., Jaffar, A., Yusoff, N. and Adnan, A. N. 2012. Gravity Flow Rack's Material Handling System for Just-In-Time (JIT) Production. Procedia Engineering. 41: 1714-1720.

Naufal, A. N., Jaffar, A., Yusoff N. and Halim, N. H. A. November 2013. Implementation of Continuous Flow System in manufacturing operation. In Applied Mechanics and Materials. 393: 9-14.

Azlina Mohd. Salleh, N., Kasolang, S., & Ahmed Jaafar, H. 2012. Review Study Of Developing An Integrated TQM With LM Framework Model In Malaysian Automotive Industry. The TQM Journal. 24(5): 399-417.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-29

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

STANDARDIZED WORK IN TPS PRODUCTION LINE. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 76(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5681