MECHANICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYAMIDE 12 COMPOSITE FOR POTENTIAL BIOMEDICAL IMPLANT: INJECTION MOLDING AND DESKTOP 3D PRINTER

Authors

  • Tuan Noraihan Azila Tuan Rahim School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Hazizan Md Akil School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Abdul Manaf Abdullah School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus,Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Dasmawati Mohamad School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus,Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
  • Zainul Ahmad Rajion School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus,Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5717

Keywords:

3D printer, injection molding, polyamide, hydroxyapatite, zirconium dioxide, implant

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication is a filament based rapid prototyping process, which offers the possibility of new polymer material for invention of biomedical implant. This study represents an investigation on a preparation and characterization of new polyamide 12 reinforced with 20 wt% of zirconium dioxide and hydroxyapatite by desktop 3D printer in comparison with conventional manufacturing method, injection molding. Polyamide 12 composite was compounded, pelletized and filament-extruded prior to apply to a 3D printer. Sample prototypes from the new polyamide composite have been successfully made and tested. Mechanical (flexural and impact) and morphological properties were evaluated and compared. From the results, the printed polyamide composite exhibited lower mechanical properties than injection molded due to the formation of porosity, laminate weakness and low pressure during printing. Although the mechanical properties of printed parts were lower than molded parts, but the capability of 3D printer to fabricate any customized 3D object could lead to the bright future and great contribution in this area, while at the same time many improvements can be made for the future works.

References

Kim, B. J., Hong, K. S., Park, K. J., Park, D. H., Chung, Y. G. and Kang, S. H. 2012. Customized Cranioplasty Implants Using Three-Dimensional Printers And Polymethyl-Methacrylate Casting. J. Korean Neurosurg. 52: 541-546.

From:http://enablingthefuture.org/resources/ [Accessed on 1 July 2015]

From:http://makezine.com/magazine/hands-on-health-care/ [Accessed on 1 July 2015]

Murphy, S. V. and Atala, A. 2014. 3D Bioprinting Of Tissues And Organs. Nat. Biotech. 32: 773-785.

From: http://3dprint.com/40128/3d-printed-trachea/ [Accessed on 1 July 2015]

Wang, H., Li, Y., Zuo, Y., Li, J., Ma, S. and Cheng, L. 2007.Biocompatibility And Osteogenesis Of Biomimetic Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide Composite Scaffolds For Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials. 28: 3338-3348.

Ahn, S.-H., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S. and Wright, P. K. 2002.Anisotropic Material Properties Of Fused Deposition Modeling ABS.Rap. Prototyp. J. 8: 225-248.

Black, J. and Hastings, G. W. 1998. Handbook of Biomaterials Properties, Chapman and Hall, UK.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-01

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

MECHANICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYAMIDE 12 COMPOSITE FOR POTENTIAL BIOMEDICAL IMPLANT: INJECTION MOLDING AND DESKTOP 3D PRINTER. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 76(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5717