EVALUATION ON ABSENTEEISM EFFECT IN PRODUCTION LINE AT AIRCRAFT COMPOSITE MANUFACTURER

Authors

  • W. L. H. Mat Desa School of Quantitative Sciences, College of Arts and Science, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • S. Kamaruddin Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • M. K. M. Nawawi School of Quantitative Sciences, College of Arts and Science, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • J. Zulkepli School of Quantitative Sciences, College of Arts and Science, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6120

Keywords:

Absenteeism, hybrid simulation, production line, throughput, workload

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of absenteeism in production line. The analysis shows that the number of absentees at production line increases the workload to the available worker and gives effect to the production. Thus, it gives a major potential for generating bottlenecks. To mitigate this problem and ensure that the workload of workers is at optimum level, an appropriate number of production plans need to be investigated. This paper demonstrates the integration of Discrete Event Simulation (DES) and System Dynamics (SD) in simulating the effect of absenteeism in production flow at an aircraft composite manufacturing factory. Based on the preliminary result, the effect of the absenteeism is found to influence the amount of throughput, waiting and cycle time.

References

B. Scholz-Reiter, K. Windt, and H. Liu. 2011. Modelling Dynamic Bottlenecks In Production Networks,†International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 24(5): 391–404

R. Omar. 2005. Operations Management, First. Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall

J. C. Ke and C. H. Lin. 2008. “Sensitivity Analysis Of Machine Repair Problems In Manufacturing Systems With Service Interruptions,†Appl. Math. Model. 32(10): 2087–2105

S. WJ. 2007. Operations Management. Mc Graw Hill

S.-Y. Chiang, C.-T. Kuo, and S. M. Meerkov. 1999. C-Bottlenecks In Serial Production Lines: Identification And Application. Proc. 38th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control (Cat. No.99CH36304). 1

Y. Feng and W. Fan. 2014. “A System Dynamics-Based Simulation Model Of Production Line With Cross-Trained Workers,†J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 84(6): 1190–1212

S. Hasgul and A. S. Buyuksunetci. 2005 “Simulation Modeling and Analysis of a New Mixed Model Production Lines,†in Winter Simulation Conference. 1408–1412.

T. M. Elftman. 1999. “Examination Of The Effects Of Bottlenecks And Production Control Rules At Assembly Stations,†University of Florida

T. Baines, S. Mason, P. O. Siebers, and J. Ladbrook. 2004. “Humans: The Missing Link In Manufacturing Simulation?,†in Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 12(7–8) SPEC. ISS. 515–526.

Desa, W. L. H. M., S. Kamaruddin, and M. K. M. Nawawi. 2012. “Modeling of Aircraft Composite Parts Using Simulation,†Adv. Mater. Res. 591: 557–560.

M. Leporis and Z. Králová. 2010 “A Simulation Approach To Production Line Bottleneck Analysis,†in International Conference February.10: 13.

J. D. Sterman. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. 53.

K. Chahal, T. Eldabi, and T. Young. 2013. “A Conceptual Framework For Hybrid System Dynamics And Discrete Event Simulation For Healthcare,†J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 26(1): 50–74,

L. Rabelo, M. Helal, A. Jones, and H.-S. Min, 2005. “Enterprise Simulation: A Hybrid System Approach,†Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 18(6): 498–508,

D. W. Kelton, R. P. Sadowski, and N. B. Zupick. 2015. Simulation with Arena, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill

J. Zulkepli, T. Eldabi, and N. Mustafee. 2012. “Hybrid Simulation For Modelling Large Systems: An Example Of Integrated Care Model,†in Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2012 Winter. 1–12.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-05

How to Cite

EVALUATION ON ABSENTEEISM EFFECT IN PRODUCTION LINE AT AIRCRAFT COMPOSITE MANUFACTURER. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6120