SQUAT EXERCISE ABNORMALITY DETECTION BY ANALYZING JOINT ANGLE FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS REHABILITATION

Authors

  • Mohd Fadzil Abu Hassan Department of Electrical, Electronic & Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley Department of Electrical, Electronic & Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Aini Hussain Department of Electrical, Electronic & Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6241

Keywords:

Osteoarthritis, rehabilitation, kinect sensor, double exponential smoothing

Abstract

Normally, osteoarthritic knee patients experienced 1) difficulties controlling their fine motors, 2) lack of muscle strength, and 3) limited range of motion. The limitations can be improved by physiotherapy exercises to 1) enhance flexibility and mobility of joints and 2) increase strength and endurance of the muscles. However, the patients should be individually monitored so that the exercises are performed correctly, effectively and efficiently. This paper focuses on squat exercise monitoring for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. The patient’s movement is captured by using a low cost 3D camera, Kinect sensor for skeletal tracking to recognize and track people without using marker. 3D coordinates of each joint is retrieved from the skeleton data, where a joint angle is derived based on two intersecting human body segments. Time series of the joint angles during the squat exercise are recorded, which are then smoothed by Double Exponential Smoothing technique to find the variability between them. The proposed method is validated by using simulated videos of squat exercise performed by 10 healthy volunteers of various physiques and gender to simulate the normal and abnormal conditions. Mean Squared Error (MSE) is calculated between the measured and smoothed angles to classify the movement either normal or abnormal. The parameters for smoothing and trend control used are 0.8928 and 0.7256, respectively, which are derived based on optimal MSE of the 10 volunteers. The simulation results show that the average MSE for each 10 samples of normal and abnormal conditions are 3.1358 and 10.5205, respectively. Hence, a simple threshold method has been developed to detect movement abnormality while doing squat exercise.

References

Rosman Azmillah; Keith L.K.T; Veerapen Kiran; Gun Suk Chyn; Chin Gek Liew; Hussein Heselynn; Chow sook Kuan; Abd Aziz Khiszaimah. 2002. Malaysia Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Osteoarthritis.

Tanna, S. 2004. Osteoarthritis “Opportunities To Address Pharmaceutical Gaps.†World Health Organization,. doi:10.1007/SpringerReference_39322.

Veerapen, K., Wigley, R. D. & Valkenburg, H. 2007. Musculoskeletal pain in Malaysia: a COPCORD survey. J Rheumatol, 34(1), 207–213. Retrieved from http://www.jrheum.org/content/34/1/207.short.

Rosman Azmillah;, Asmahan, M. I., Abdullah, A. wong, Gupta, E. Das, Suk Chyn, G., Habibah, M. Y., Kamaruzaman, H. F. et al. 2013. Management of Osteoarthriris 2nd Edition (Malaysia). Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), (December). 1–52.

Jordan, K. M., Arden, N. K., Doherty, M., Bannwarth, B., Bijlsma, J. W. J., Dieppe, P., Gunther, K. et al. 2003. EULAR Recommendations 2003: An Evidence Based Approach To The Management Of Knee Osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases. 62(12): 1145–1155. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.011742.

Joo, L. Y., Yin, T. S., Rehab, F., Xu, D., Chia, P. F., Wee, C., Kuah, K. et al. 2010. A feasibility Study using Intercative Commercial Off-the-Shelf Computer Gaming in Upper Lim Rehabilitation in Patients after Stroke. 437–441. doi:10.2340/16501977-0528.

Kutilek, P., Socha, V. & Hana, K. 2014. Analysis And Prediction Of Upper Extremity Movements By Cyclograms. Central European Journal of Medicine. 9(6): 814–820. doi:10.2478/s11536-013-0322-y.

Kutilek, P., Hozman, J., Cerny, R. & Hejda, J. 2006. Methods of Measurement and Evaluation of Eye , Head and Shoulders Position in Neurological Practice.

Aizan Masdar, B. S. K. K. Ibrahim, Dirman Hanafi, M. Mahadi Abdul Jamil & K. A. A. Rahman. 2013. Knee Joint Angle Measurement System using Gyroscop and Flex-Sensors for Rehabilitation. Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON). 5–8.

Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L. & Rodgers, M. 2012. A Review Of Wearable Sensors And Systems With Application In Rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 9(1): 21. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-21.

Han, J., Shao, L., Xu, D. & Shotton, J. 2013. Enhanced computer vision with Microsoft Kinect sensor: A review. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 43(5), 1318–1334. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378.

Stone, E. E. & Skubic, M. 2011. Evaluation Of An Inexpensive Depth Camera For Passive In-Home Fall Risk Assessment. 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops. 71–77. doi:10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246034.

Dutta, T. 2012. Evaluation Of The Kinect Sensor For 3-D Kinematic Measurement In The Workplace. Applied Ergonomics. 43(4): 645–649. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.011.

Fernández-Baena, A., Susín, A. & Lligadas, X. 2012. Biomechanical Validation Of Upper-Body And Lower-Body Joint Movements Of Kinect Motion Capture Data For Rehabilitation Treatments. Proceedings of the 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, INCoS 2012. 656–661. doi:10.1109/iNCoS.2012.66.

Microsoft Corporation. 2013. Kinect for Windows | Human Interface Guidelines v1.8.

Dikovski, B., Madjarov, G. & Gjorgjevikj, D. 2014. Evaluation Of Different Feature Sets For Gait Recognition Using Skeletal Data From Kinect. 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics. 26–30.

UK, A. R. 2013. What Is Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ?

Azimi, M. (n.d.). Skeletal Joint Smoothing White Paper. Microsoft,. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj131429.aspx [3 June 2015].

Chung, M. G. & Kim, S. K. 2013. Efficient Jitter Compensation Using Double Exponential Smoothing. Information Sciences. 227: 83–89. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.008

Md Juremi, N. R., Zulkifley, M. A. & Hussain, A. 2013. Smoothing The Artificial SSVEP Response Using Double Exponential Smoothing Method. IEEE ICSIPA 2013 - IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications. (1): 287–290. doi:10.1109/ICSIPA.2013.6708019.

Constant, S. 2013. Forecasting With Exponential Smoothing – What’s The Right Smoothing Constant? 17(3) : 117–126.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-12

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

SQUAT EXERCISE ABNORMALITY DETECTION BY ANALYZING JOINT ANGLE FOR KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS REHABILITATION. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6241