USING HEURISTIC EVALUATION TO IMPROVE THE USABILITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD (EMR) MOBILE INTERFACE OF THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY AND ANESTHESIA SYSTEM (CSAS)

Authors

  • Hasanin Mohammed Salman Jabatan Kejuruteraan Perisian & Sistem Maklumat, Fakulti Sains Komputer Dan Teknologi Maklumat, UPM
  • Azrina Kamaruddin Jabatan Kejuruteraan Perisian & Sistem Maklumat, Fakulti Sains Komputer Dan Teknologi Maklumat, UPM
  • Lily Suriani Affendey Jabatan Sains Komputer, Fakulti Sains Komputer Dan Teknologi Maklumat, UPM.
  • Evi Indriasari Mansor Jabatan Multimedia, Fakulti Sains Komputer Dan Teknologi Maklumat, UPM
  • Rahmita Wirza O.K Rahmat Jabatan Multimedia, Fakulti Sains Komputer Dan Teknologi Maklumat, UPM
  • Azrul Hazri Jantan Jabatan Multimedia, Fakulti Sains Komputer Dan Teknologi Maklumat, UPM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6254

Keywords:

Heuristic evaluation, interface usabilit, electronic medical record, mobile interface design

Abstract

This paper presents initial work on mobile user-interface for electronic medical record for cardio experts. The current problem exits when the existing system is left unused by the users, in our case the cardio surgeons due to bad user interface design which involve a heavy cognitive loads and navigation problems. Medical records contain treatment history and relevant experiences related to the patient care. In order to avoid paper based medical record (PMR) drawbacks, most industrialized nations have implemented electronic medical record (EMR). This research aims to evaluate the existing CSAS system usability using heuristic evaluation and then develop an EMR system that overcomes the interface usability problems by designing an effective user interface that is acceptable to healthcare professionals with tablets as the device. Hence, proposing a new user interface prototype taking into account the findings from the evaluation process.

References

Smelcer, J.B., Jacobs, H.M., and Kantrovich, L. (2009). Usability of Electronic Medical records. JUS: Journal of Usability Studies, 4(2): 70-84.

Defining and Testing EMR Usability: Principles and Proposed Methods of EMR Usability Evaluation and Rating .2009. HIMSS EHR Usability Task Force: Chicago, IL.

Garrett, P. and J.Seidman. 2011. EMR vs EHR – What is the Difference?. [Online]. From: http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/emr-vs-ehr-difference/. [Accessed on 20 November 2014].

Nielsen, J. 1992. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Institute of Medicine. 1997. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. National Academy Press: Washington, DC

Young, A.S., Sullivan, G., Burnam, M. A., and Brook, R. H. 1998. Measuring The Quality Of Outpatient Treatment For Schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 55(7): 611 –7.

Zhenga, K., Padmanb, R., and Johnsonb, M.P. 2007. User Interface Optimization for an Electronic Medical Record System. Stud Health Technol Inform. 129(2):1058-62.

Murphy,E., Ferris, F, O’Donnell, W .2007. An Electronic Medical Records System for Clinical Research and the EMR–EDC Interface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 48(10): 4383–4389. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0345.

Uto Y, Iwaanakuchi T, Muranaga F, Kumamoto I. 2013. Development Of The Electronic Patient Record System Based On Problem Oriented System. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 192:MEDINFO, IOS Press: Amsterdam. 192;MEDINFO.

Schoeffel R. 2003. The Concept Of Product Usability. ISO Bulletin. 34:6â€7.

Caudill-Slosberg., M., B.Weeks., W., 2005. Case Study: Identifying Potential Problems at the Human/Technical Interface in Complex Clinical Systems American November/December 2005. 20(6): 353-357.

Effendey, L.S., Selamat, M.H., Atan., R., OK Rahmat, R.W., Abd Kadir., R., Dimon., M.Z., Abd Rahman, M.R., Ooi Su Min, J., 2010 :Database Design for Cardiothoracic Surgery. Copyright.

Alan F. Rose,Jeffrey L. Schnipper, Elyse R. Park, Eric G. Poona, Qi Lia, Blackford Middleton. 2005. Using Qualitative Studies To Improve The Usability Of An EMR. Journal Of Biomedical Informatics. 38 (1): 51–60.Human-Centered Computing in Health Information Systems. Part 1: Analysis and Design.

Horskya, J., McColgan, K., E. Panga, J., J. Melnikas,A., Jeffrey A. Linder, Jeffrey L. Schnipper, , 2010.

Complementary Methods Of System Usability Evaluation: Surveys And Observations During Software Design And Development Cycles.Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 43 (5): 782–790.

Wilcox., B., A., Gallenger., D. K., Boden-Albala, B., Bakken., R. S.2012. “Research Data Collection Methods: From Paper to Tablet Computers “. Informatics. Paper 1. http://reporitory.academymyhealth.org/informatics_resources/1.

Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I.2006. A Review Of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing The Effectiveness Of Hand Held Computers With Paper Methods For Data Collection. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 6 (1): 23.

Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. 1990. Heuristics evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings from ACM CHI’90 Conference. Seattle, WA. 249-256

Downloads

Published

2015-11-12

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

USING HEURISTIC EVALUATION TO IMPROVE THE USABILITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD (EMR) MOBILE INTERFACE OF THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY AND ANESTHESIA SYSTEM (CSAS). (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 77(7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6254